- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 8,175
- Reaction Score
- 15,349
I didn't really investigate but Alabama looks way overseeded for their resume. What else is out there?
Very true committee overrates the big 10 again after losing to the big east (6-2 in favor of BE without UConn participating) this year and having a horrible tournament last season.I would argue both Michigan and Indiana from the Big Ten have no business being in the tournament (most over-seeded). Indiana had a below .500 Big Ten record and was 3-7 vs ranked teams. Michigan finished 17-14 overall and were 2-7 vs ranked teams.
How did that league get 9 teams? I would suggest no league should ever get 9 teams. Makes zero sense.I would argue both Michigan and Indiana from the Big Ten have no business being in the tournament (most over-seeded). Indiana had a below .500 Big Ten record and was 3-7 vs ranked teams. Michigan finished 17-14 overall and were 2-7 vs ranked teams.
I felt the same. But then I thought of the possibility of facing either of those teams first round and I didn't like it. If we landed Indiana we'd be crapping bricks.I would argue both Michigan and Indiana from the Big Ten have no business being in the tournament (most over-seeded). Indiana had a below .500 Big Ten record and was 3-7 vs ranked teams. Michigan finished 17-14 overall and were 2-7 vs ranked teams.
For the life of me i dont understand why Michigan is in. Well, i know why but they absolutely do not belong in thsi tourney. Maybe the committee was afraid Juwan may show up at their doorsteps with baby powder.I would argue both Michigan and Indiana from the Big Ten have no business being in the tournament (most over-seeded). Indiana had a below .500 Big Ten record and was 3-7 vs ranked teams. Michigan finished 17-14 overall and were 2-7 vs ranked teams.
Was going to say this.Tennessee underseeded as a 3 for sure. They just won the SEC tourney and have won 15 of their last 17 games. Some people had them as an outside shot at a 1 seed. I thought for sure they should be a 2.
I was laughing hysterically when I saw that. That's how you'd expect them to seed an upset winner in the American, but the freaking ACC? Pretty pathetic.I get the ACC is way down, but V Tech as an 11 seed feels just slightly disrespectful after winning the conference tournament. Lol.
But if I'm Tech, I wouldn't complain too much. Always would rather be an 11 seed than an 8, 9 or 10.
They gave Tennessee's 2 seed to Duke...lucky for us if we get to Regional Final, glad TN not in our region.Tennessee underseeded as a 3 for sure. They just won the SEC tourney and have won 15 of their last 17 games. Some people had them as an outside shot at a 1 seed. I thought for sure they should be a 2.
That was drier than a stale rice cake. Well done.xavier is overseeded imo. don't think they deserved a 2 seed.
edit: i was looking at the nit bracket, sorry.
Texas A @ M should've been invited way over Indiana. Thats a team that got heavily underseeded and unfairly uninvited.I would argue both Michigan and Indiana from the Big Ten have no business being in the tournament (most over-seeded). Indiana had a below .500 Big Ten record and was 3-7 vs ranked teams. Michigan finished 17-14 overall and were 2-7 vs ranked teams.