- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 8,182
- Reaction Score
- 15,380
So how long can the PAC12 delay their media deal?
And how long does champagne last in the fridge?
And how long does champagne last in the fridge?
This is pretty solid. I’d imagine OSU and Houston get swapped because OSU has the pull.Pods are probably what they would use:
Colorado, BYU, Arizona, Arizona State
UConn, UCF, Cincy, WVU
TTU, Baylor, TCU, Houston
Oklahoma State, Kansas, Kansas State, Iowa State
I could see Okie State being upset with this though.
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read." Groucho MarxYou got any inside information?
The whole pods thing just feels like a coping mechanism. If the four corners come we are a curbside meal that someone decided they didn’t want.
Yeah. Houston/Kansas isn't a terrible basketball pairing either, and for football they'd prob do very well in that podThis is pretty solid. I’d imagine OSU and Houston get swapped because OSU has the pull.
The 3/4 seems more like a better fit. Both Arizona schools and Colorado. Yes, I know Utah has a strong following and a strong football pedigree with multiple top 25 finishes, NY bowl games and stuff, but they are a complete overlap of BYU for market in a market that doesn't suggest two teams in the same conference.
And in a 3/4 corner grab by Big12, UConn slots in nicely to balance out time zones.
Luckily, this isn’t key. Brando is just guessing.Rule number 1
Rule number 1
I don't know why the Big 12 would want two Arizona schools.We might replace utah, who would be redundant with BYU. Who knows.
Read Coast Atlantic's post at the top of this page.I don't know why the Big 12 would want two Arizona schools.
I'm not seeing an explanation about why they would want two Arizona schools. Am i missing something? Note: Not trying to be a smart ass, just not seeing it.Read Coast Atlantic's post at the top of this page.
Sorry about that. In the other thread a tweet from Crain (I referenced the wrong one) stated that Arizona Boatd if Regents passed a bill that would make it very difficult and expensive for UofA to leave without taking ASU with them.I'm not seeing an explanation about why they would want two Arizona schools. Am i missing something? Note: Not trying to be a smart ass, just not seeing it.
Ok, thanks.Sorry about that. In the other thread a tweet from Crain (I referenced the wrong one) stated that Arizona Boatd if Regents passed a bill that would make it very difficult and expensive for UofA to leave without taking ASU with them.
Nah. Just a sense. This feels way different from the other times we gone through this. The behavior is entirely different.You got any inside information?