- Joined
- May 1, 2020
- Messages
- 6,463
- Reaction Score
- 19,123
Thanks. I couldn't remember what happened.The coach that bring them to Olympic switch to men's team
Thanks. I couldn't remember what happened.The coach that bring them to Olympic switch to men's team
Australia had some heroic performances in the 4th Q. Talbot, Magbegor, Whitcomb were excellentAustralia wins 75-72. This game was definitely one of runs looking at the scores for each quarter.
@Dillon77 This type of game was what I was concerned about for Canada when I referenced the mental side. Would they wilt when it matters? Looking at the final score, one may say no. Looking at the final quarter score of 24-15 in Australia's favour, I think they did. Question now is how do they bounce back during the final game and quarter-finals.
Along with great scouting on how Canada was defending. Canada took chances and Australia made them pay, especially with the pick and roll. That game is excellent footage for coaches to show their players.Australia had some heroic performances in the 4th Q. Talbot, Magbegor, Whitcomb were excellent
Nurse played well in the 4th Q after a rough game in general but missed a critical (albeit tough) layup that would have tied at 73-73
Oh man, Amihere is one tough player and defender. Boston and Amihere together is some combo.
View attachment 79361
The final games in Group B are going to be very interesting in determining who makes the top 2. Canada, France and Australia are tied 3-1, and each team having a win over another 3-1 team (Canada over France, France over Australia and Australia over Canada). Whoever has the job figuring out all the scenarios, I don't envy them one bit.
This is why the tie for first place is intriguing. Had Canada won, they would have been in a better position to claim first place overall.I think 4 teams from each Group advance to the quarterfinals. Mali will be eliminated, as will either Japan or Serbia. The seeding of the top 2-3 teams will likely rely on scoring differential.
Australia wins 75-72. This game was definitely one of runs looking at the scores for each quarter.
@Dillon77 This type of game was what I was concerned about for Canada when I referenced the mental side. Would they wilt when it matters? Looking at the final score, one may say no. Looking at the final quarter score of 24-15 in Australia's favour, I think they did. Question now is how do they bounce back during the final game and quarter-finals.
France will finish at the top of Group B ifThe final games in Group B are going to be very interesting in determining who makes the top 2. Canada, France and Australia are tied 3-1, and each team having a win over another 3-1 team (Canada over France, France over Australia and Australia over Canada). Whoever has the job figuring out all the scenarios, I don't envy them one bit.
I see where you're coming from, and I'm hoping this isn't the case. Definitely a game of runs, however being able to punch back when it matters is what was a tad concerning. Based on previous results at World Cup events where they've had the same challenges, it's something Canada Basketball fans may wonder about once they move into the play-off rounds.CC...I watched the 2nd half of the game and really thought it was a game of runs. Perhaps some decisions could've been redone but I saw nothing to believe Canada choked it over/blipped out on a large scale. If there's any mental impetus that was necessary, it was for Australia: they needed this game.
Canada has another prelim game left, right? If so, that's the game I'd pay attention to. How do they perform? On target? Or a bit off?
I think 4 teams from each Group advance to the quarterfinals. Mali will be eliminated, as will either Japan or Serbia. The seeding of the top 2-3 teams will likely rely on scoring differential.
Score differential would only come into play in the event of a 3-way tie. A 2-way tie would be broken by head-to-head.Now, how many points does each team need in their last game to avoid being ranked third? The assumption is that if you're not 1 or 2 in Pool B, a QF match up with the US is very likely.
Appreciate this @PlebeScore differential would only come into play in the event of a 3-way tie. A 2-way tie would be broken by head-to-head.
If it does go to score differential, Australia currently holds the advantage, but Canada has the opportunity to run up the score against Mali, the weakest team of the group.
3rd place team in Group B would have a 50% chance of drawing the US in the QF.
View attachment 79362
I tried to find the tie-breaker rules on the website, to no avail but the Australian commentators in the pre-match to last game were talking about a 13 point margin of victory being required, which could mean it is the point differential between tied teams (i.e. Canada +11, France -1 and Australia -10) not overall.Score differential would only come into play in the event of a 3-way tie. A 2-way tie would be broken by head-to-head.
If it does go to score differential, Australia currently holds the advantage, but Canada has the opportunity to run up the score against Mali, the weakest team of the group.
3rd place team in Group B would have a 50% chance of drawing the US in the QF.
Oh, that changes it completely if it's only head-to-head point differential. That would mean the point differential among the 3 teams is already settled and Australia is doomed to 3rd unless one of either France or Canada is upset.I tried to find the tie-breaker rules on the website, to no avail but the Australian commentators in the pre-match to last game were talking about a 13 point margin of victory being required, which could mean it is the point differential between tied teams (i.e. Canada +11, France -1 and Australia -10) not overall.
If that is the case, if all three win their last match, then Australia would finish third in the group.
It's curious that FIBA framed the tiebreak scenarios this way, because the nature of the crossover procedure means that there's zero advantage to finishing 1st as opposed to 2nd, but a major disadvantage to finishing 3rd.France will finish at the top of Group B if
Canada will finish at the top of Group B if
- They defeat Serbia AND
- Mali defeat Canada
Australia will finish at the top of Group B if
- They defeat Mali AND
- France defeat Serbia OR Japan defeat Australia
- Serbia defeat France AND
- They defeat Japan or Mali defeat Canada
Unless it weighted like a draft, where top team has more chances (e.g. 1st team has two chances to play 4th team where as 2nd team team only has one chance). Who knows, not enough information publicly available.It's curious that FIBA framed the tiebreak scenarios this way, because the nature of the crossover procedure means that there's zero advantage to finishing 1st as opposed to 2nd, but a major disadvantage to finishing 3rd.