prankster
Twister Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2011
- Messages
- 4,360
- Reaction Score
- 5,455
Which puts then squarely among the Hillary supporters, here.Even the MSM is starting to see the corruption. Not sure they really care.
Which puts then squarely among the Hillary supporters, here.
Sure she is a criminal.
Sure she and her husband are grifters.
Sure her husband is a sexual predator.
Sure she covers for him by attacking the victims.
Sure she exposed national secrets to our enemies.
Sure she abandoned the people in Benghazi to their fate.
Sure she has violated innumerable election laws.
Sure she has paid people to disrupt Trump rallies.
Sure she rigged the DNC primary process to exclude Bernie.
Sure she paid people to commit assault.
But Trump has small hands and he said "".
Name the lie.Sure, Prankster's an egregious liar on many of these counts.
He did say "many", although, as you suggest, naming even one would be an interesting effort.Name the lie.
Name the lie.
He did say "many", although, as you suggest, naming even one would be an interesting effort.
Still....he is a fairly daffy liberal (even by liberal standards) so hurling baseless invective is about all he can muster.
1. She is not a criminal. She has not committed a crime, nor proven guilty of one. Angry old men like you and Prankster waving your hands and shouting "criminal" does not make someone a criminal.
2. They are not grifters. Clinton Foundation money goes towards charitable causes. I know you don't believe in charity since you think people don't deserve anything they can't pay for out of pocket, but it is time for you to realize that society views charity as a positive entity. To be a grifter would be to fraudulently write off your son's Boy Scout fee as a charitable expense.
3. Why does the right hold Bill Clinton and Trump to a different standard? Do you think it's okay for a person to engage in predatory behavior as long as they hate black and brown people as much as you do?
4. Anything HRC has said about alleged victims pales to what you and other Trumpists say about his accusers.
5. She has not exposed national secrets to our enemies.
6. She has not violated election laws. Just because you create a false accusation does not make it true.
7. Hillary hasn't paid anyone sh.t to bust up rallies or commit assault.
8. DNC made it tougher for Bernie because a) he switched to the party at the start of the primary as opposed to being a member for 40+ years, and b) HRC gave the party a better chance at winning the election. Which GOP voters proved they know nothing about by nominating Trump.
You should leave the Enterprise and join us on Earth sometime.
You really are an embarrassment to the University of Connecticut.This coming from the guy who starts threads asserting that liberals have diseased minds? All you know is baseless invective. In addition to being unintelligent and nasty, you're a hypocrite of the highest order. No principles and a hate-filled heart. Sad, really.
1. She is not a criminal. She has not committed a crime, nor proven guilty of one. Angry old men like you and Prankster waving your hands and shouting "criminal" does not make someone a criminal.
2. They are not grifters. Clinton Foundation money goes towards charitable causes. I know you don't believe in charity since you think people don't deserve anything they can't pay for out of pocket, but it is time for you to realize that society views charity as a positive entity. To be a grifter would be to fraudulently write off your son's Boy Scout fee as a charitable expense.
3. Why does the right hold Bill Clinton and Trump to a different standard? Do you think it's okay for a person to engage in predatory behavior as long as they hate black and brown people as much as you do?
4. Anything HRC has said about alleged victims pales to what you and other Trumpists say about his accusers.
5. She has not exposed national secrets to our enemies.
6. She has not violated election laws. Just because you create a false accusation does not make it true.
7. Hillary hasn't paid anyone sh.t to bust up rallies or commit assault.
8. DNC made it tougher for Bernie because a) he switched to the party at the start of the primary as opposed to being a member for 40+ years, and b) HRC gave the party a better chance at winning the election. Which GOP voters proved they know nothing about by nominating Trump.
You should leave the Enterprise and join us on Earth sometime.
Hating Trump I get. He is a flaming jerk. A clown.
But defending Hillary like this, across the board, or really in any way??!!
That is embarrassing and a partisan hacker of the highest order. And is to be fully scorned.
BTW, the Podesta e-mails are on line, as are the Project Veritas videos.1. She is not a criminal. She has not committed a crime, nor proven guilty of one. Angry old men like you and Prankster waving your hands and shouting "criminal" does not make someone a criminal.
2. They are not grifters. Clinton Foundation money goes towards charitable causes. I know you don't believe in charity since you think people don't deserve anything they can't pay for out of pocket, but it is time for you to realize that society views charity as a positive entity. To be a grifter would be to fraudulently write off your son's Boy Scout fee as a charitable expense.
3. Why does the right hold Bill Clinton and Trump to a different standard? Do you think it's okay for a person to engage in predatory behavior as long as they hate black and brown people as much as you do?
4. Anything HRC has said about alleged victims pales to what you and other Trumpists say about his accusers.
5. She has not exposed national secrets to our enemies.
6. She has not violated election laws. Just because you create a false accusation does not make it true.
7. Hillary hasn't paid anyone sh.t to bust up rallies or commit assault.
8. DNC made it tougher for Bernie because a) he switched to the party at the start of the primary as opposed to being a member for 40+ years, and b) HRC gave the party a better chance at winning the election. Which GOP voters proved they know nothing about by nominating Trump.
You should leave the Enterprise and join us on Earth sometime.
I'm sorry, did I trigger you? Do you need to find a safe space?
You really are an embarrassment to the University of Connecticut.
Just shows how devalued a degree from that once proud institution has fallen.
Your reading comprehension skills need a lot of work.
And, as was already noted in that thread, PolitiFact rated the initial post "Mostly True".
And the revised post ""True".
Don't know what any of the means.
But you have embarrassed yourself.
BTW, the Podesta e-mails are on line, as are the Project Veritas videos.
They can help clear up your misconceptions regarding the confused old grandmother you are so enamored with.
It means you're acting like a wimpy millenial baby. I'm not going to shield you from my views even if they offend and upset you.
And you are an embarrassment to anyone who has ever engaged in political discussion throughout the history of human civilization.
I'm in the process of obtaining a bachelor's degree from a university ranked higher than the University of Connecticut on every major list. I'm willing to put my academic record, standardized and IQ test scores, and any other meter of intelligence on the line against you -- although that wouldn't be fair to you, would it?
Your parsing of reality and understanding of basic definitions of words in the English language needs a lot of work.
You really are an embarrassment to the University of Connecticut.
Just shows how devalued a degree from that once proud institution has fallen.
Don't know what any of that means.
But you have fully embarrassed yourself.
You are a hoot!You only believe the accuracy of these sources because they confirm what you wish to be true.
Regardless of your opinion of Stairmaster, a Univeristy of Connecticut degree has more value today than it did 20 years ago, and it continues to improve. No need to degrade UConn for no reason.
I like it when you aren't putting UConn down in your posts. Nice change.
If pointing out your embarrassing stupidity and that you are a partisan hacker of the highest order who can be ignored by anyone wishing to have rational discussion makes me wimpy in the mind of such a hack, so be it.
As to millenial, I am 50. So I guess I will take that as a form of compliment.