Dooley
Done with U-con athletics
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2012
- Messages
- 9,963
- Reaction Score
- 32,822
'Bout Time. The reasoning they gave to not punish UNC was utter nonsense..."The NCAA has been hesitant to punish the school in the past because the phony courses in question were not solely available and beneficial to athletes. When the general student body as a whole is subject to academic fraud, the NCAA has traditionally not taken action an instead let the universities take action against themselves."
http://www.cbssports.com/collegebas...cademic-fraud-investigation-at-north-carolina
Bottom line: you can't ban UCONN for a silly APR metric and then not punish UNC at all for their completely fraudulent athletic department.
http://www.cbssports.com/collegebas...cademic-fraud-investigation-at-north-carolina
Bottom line: you can't ban UCONN for a silly APR metric and then not punish UNC at all for their completely fraudulent athletic department.