UcMiami
How it is
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 14,103
- Reaction Score
- 46,594
I think you always judge great players by how they play in big games and there are no bigger games than the regionals and final fours when looking at uconn teams and players. This particular set of posts got started because I said I don't specifically count championships, but what Breanna did as a freshman for me separated her. She did not have as good a freshman year as Maya had, but in the most important four games of her freshman year she was phenomenal and she was better in those games than either Maya or DT. DT had the worst game of her career in the FF her freshman year, Maya had a very good game in the FF but she was not efficient shooting and her team lost, and Breanna had one of the best games of her career as a freshman in the FF and carried her team to victory. They were all playing on very good #1 seed teams and they all made it to the FF and played very good teams there and Breanna came through as a freshman.Sure but instead of those games why can't we look at others as the comparison?
First off- Maya's senior year vs ND she was spectacular. UCONN would have won if you subsitituted Maya's great game if she had the teammates the frosh Stewie (12-13) had in 12-13.
Secondly, in this same line of comparing years, Stewie for example had good support from KML in 12-13 and pretty good support from Farris and Dolson. Give Stewie the support that Maya had in her senior year last game vs ND, imo Stewie isn't winning that game either. SO here we have a clear example that if you give Maya Stewie's teammates she wins too.
And the other loss for Maya in NCAA's- Maya's frosh year is similar to Stewie's jr year. Stewie only took 8 shots and wound up with only 8 points. That's not that good. While Maya took 19 shots as a frosh her EFG% was 50%. THAT 50% is the same as Stewie's was year when she was a junior. Give Maya -- MoJeff and KML and the jr Morgan Tuck - imo that is superior to the Big 3 of the young soph Tina, Hot-and-cold-Renee, and anyone else you want to add which Maya played with as a frosh.
MoJeff is HUGE in this case to help support Stewie last year. She should have been Final Four MVP last year. I love Renee but MoJeff is better. Tuck and KML superior to the young Tina and whomever else we add.
They all had great careers, they were all phenomenal in big games the rest of their careers (Stewart has three games left we hope.) They all played on dominant teams that put together historic winning streaks. There is no wrong answer. For me personally the NCAAs as freshman are the determining factor. And the pivotal moments were the semi-final games. Diana 1-15, 0-11, 4 points in a loss; Maya 8-19, 3-11, 20 points in a loss; Breanna 10-16, 4-5, 29 points in a win. For a lot of other folks, what Diana did her junior and senior year are determining factors that push her ahead of Maya and Breanna. And for others Maya's total game and consistency for four years push her ahead of Diana and Breanna, still others will say three is better than two, and should Breanna win four that will be better than three.
Breanna while struggling much of her freshman year comes close to Maya's career stats, and beyond stats to my eye poses greater issue on both ends of the floor than Maya did - Maya is a phenomenal offensive threat and a very disruptive defender, but because she is taller and longer while having very similar offensive and defensive skills Breanna is just more intimidating - it is much more difficult to shoot over her, and it is much more difficult to make her alter her shot.