- Joined
- Sep 20, 2011
- Messages
- 415
- Reaction Score
- 414
There is something that bothers the hell out of me here. Granted, if the catholics want to play hardbnall on this, I guess they have the right. After all, they have been nice enough to take their share of conference revenues (even though only a couple of schools from their faction actually earned anything) all of these years so, again, they are entitled to some decision making here.
What possible good could it do however to make this information public? What we do know is that if we don't find replacements for Pitt, Cuse and WVU soon, there won't be a football conference to save. If Boise St knows we are dead without them, they hold all of the cards and can demand anything they want (the BE pays their MWC departure fees, gives them additional revenues, lets them choose what home games they have, reimburses them for all travel expenses, etc.... If this is the catholic members' stance and the world now knows this, all remaining football members of the conference just got f#&ked by their non football playing conference mates.
I agree it's damaging but at least it gets out in the open what everyone already knows - that non-football members are dictating matters that pertain to football. This is what I can't stand about the setup. People can disagree with me all they want and that's fine. But I believe this is going to continue as a problem as long as these two different type of institutions continue to battle over who gets to steer the ship. The FB schools and BB schools do not have common interests.