Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 832 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
15,334
Reaction Score
16,622
Going independent would not be shuttering the program.
P5 Commissioner: "let's grab UConn, they're obviously very serious about football since they decided to go with the conference that doesn't even play the sport"
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
26,191
Reaction Score
31,680
This times a million


Of course the counter argument to this is maybe the basketball fan base should’ve been more loyal and showed up for the team when they struggled in the Ollie era, rather than forcing a nostalgia move and the expenses incurred to support it…

Neither argument is fair (and to be clear, I think the move has proven to be correct). Win and more fans show up, lose and less do, regardless of the team.

Case in point, this football season opened with some excitement and more than 30k were distributed for the opener, with the highest number actually in the stadium in close to a decade. Football had 14k season ticket holders in 2023, the most since 2017 (~16k in 2017). (For the curious, Men's Basketball has 8k season ticket holders counting students and the band at Gampel and nearly 11k at XL (5 thousand and 9 thousand for just the sold portion)).

For football, UConn wasted its AAC opportunity. After Louisville, Pitt, Syracuse and WVU were gone we should have been head and shoulders above everything in that conference with Cincy as the other rival.

Instead Herbst and Manuel squandered it away. They didn’t resource football the right way. Raised admission standards too high and god knows waste else. Too many institutional barriers..

If we had spent more money on the front end of the AAC, we might be in a better spot and lost much less money.

Herbst and Manuel were total losers who should have been launched into the sun.
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
15,334
Reaction Score
16,622
Considering BYU, WSU, and OSU all went independent, you’re wrong.
BYU is a different case due to the religious affiliation and national footprint, and WSU/OSU is being disingenuous at best considering it just happened.
 

shizzle787

King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
11,961
Reaction Score
18,458
BYU is a different case due to the religious affiliation and national footprint, and WSU/OSU is being disingenuous at best considering it just happened.
How is that disingenuous? OSU and WSU are in the relatively same position UConn was in. They can rebuild the Pac-12 with MW schools or go indy/WCC. They chose the latter. UConn chose the equivalent of the former. WOSU doesn’t want to be associated with the G5 moniker. To boot, the Big East of 2013 was better than the current WCC.
 

Drew

Its a post, about nothing!
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
7,747
Reaction Score
27,463
How is that disingenuous? OSU and WSU are in the relatively same position UConn was in. They can rebuild the Pac-12 with MW schools or go indy/WCC. They chose the latter. UConn chose the equivalent of the former. WOSU doesn’t want to be associated with the G5 moniker. To boot, the Big East of 2013 was better than the current WCC.
Just to be clear- OSU and WSU aren’t choosing to be Independent. In fact, they’re actually contractually obligated to rebuild the Pac-12 to at least an 8 team league by 2026 given the settlement they reached this week with the old PAC-12 schools. They’re not even Independent this year or next, technically remaining in the PAC-12 playing majority of non-conference games against the Mountain West.

And BYU is far and away different from UConn football wise and institutionally. Not only does BYU have a football NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP under their belt, but they have a massive religious following that allowed them to float themselves as an independent for a temporary period of time. But even then, it was never designed for them to be an Independent long term and their November scheduling was absolutely atrocious.

There is a massive difference between you personally feeling like being an Independent is fine versus how it’s perceived in the NCAA athletics landscape. Independence is not a long term solution for ANYONE in FBS - even Notre Dame is quasi-affiliated with the ACC. Pretending otherwise is just foolish and stupid.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
20,683
Reaction Score
49,577
For football, UConn wasted its AAC opportunity. After Louisville, Pitt, Syracuse and WVU were gone we should have been head and shoulders above everything in that conference with Cincy as the other rival.

Instead Herbst and Manuel squandered it away. They didn’t resource football the right way. Raised admission standards too high and god knows waste else. Too many institutional barriers..

If we had spent more money on the front end of the AAC, we might be in a better spot and lost much less money.

Herbst and Manuel were total losers who should have been launched into the sun.
I blame killing spring weekend
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,283
Reaction Score
4,913
OSU/WSU are independent in name only. They are literally playing full 8-game MWC schedules. Sure they don’t count in the standings… but they aren’t scheduling as an independent and the language came with massive penalties to them if they try to rebuild the PAC-2 with MWC schools (unless they take the entire conference)
 

shizzle787

King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
11,961
Reaction Score
18,458
Just to be clear- OSU and WSU aren’t choosing to be Independent. In fact, they’re actually contractually obligated to rebuild the Pac-12 to at least an 8 team league by 2026 given the settlement they reached this week with the old PAC-12 schools. They’re not even Independent this year or next, technically remaining in the PAC-12 playing majority of non-conference games against the Mountain West.

And BYU is far and away different from UConn football wise and institutionally. Not only does BYU have a football NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP under their belt, but they have a massive religious following that allowed them to float themselves as an independent for a temporary period of time. But even then, it was never designed for them to be an Independent long term and their November scheduling was absolutely atrocious.

There is a massive difference between you personally feeling like being an Independent is fine versus how it’s perceived in the NCAA athletics landscape. Independence is not a long term solution for ANYONE in FBS - even Notre Dame is quasi-affiliated with the ACC. Pretending otherwise is just foolish and stupid.
I have not found the contractually obligated to reform the Pac-12 part anywhere. Also, they are getting 3.6M per year from the CFP from 26-28 for being independent. No one knows if they get to keep that if they reform a G6 Pac-12.

If UConn felt it was better to be in a G5 football league than be independent, we would have already done it. Oh wait, we did and then left and then denied an invite from CUSA.
 

shizzle787

King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
11,961
Reaction Score
18,458
OSU/WSU are independent in name only. They are literally playing full 8-game MWC schedules. Sure they don’t count in the standings… but they aren’t scheduling as an independent and the language came with massive penalties to them if they try to rebuild the PAC-2 with MWC schools (unless they take the entire conference)
No they are not. They are playing six game schedules. They happened to have already scheduled 1-2 MW as part of prior arrangements. Also, they are both paying the MW 7 million for the arrangement. They also are playing their games on an OTA network the CW as opposed to primarily CBS Sports Network.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2015
Messages
824
Reaction Score
2,264
Nothing that Boneyarders haven’t said in many different iterations, but nice to see it in print.
Two thoughts:
#1
Doomed
Go Huskies
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
26,191
Reaction Score
31,680
Considering BYU, WSU, and OSU all went independent, you’re wrong.

BYU is a football brand. And they went independent at a time when it was easier to be independent.

Also they aren’t independent anymore so what are you even saying?

OSU and WSU? That’s not by choice. So again, what are you even talking about?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
26,191
Reaction Score
31,680
I have not found the contractually obligated to reform the Pac-12 part anywhere. Also, they are getting 3.6M per year from the CFP from 26-28 for being independent. No one knows if they get to keep that if they reform a G6 Pac-12.

If UConn felt it was better to be in a G5 football league than be independent, we would have already done it. Oh wait, we did and then left and then denied an invite from CUSA.

What G5 league is offering us a football only slot?

I’ll wait.
 

Drew

Its a post, about nothing!
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
7,747
Reaction Score
27,463
I have not found the contractually obligated to reform the Pac-12 part anywhere. Also, they are getting 3.6M per year from the CFP from 26-28 for being independent. No one knows if they get to keep that if they reform a G6 Pac-12.

If UConn felt it was better to be in a G5 football league than be independent, we would have already done it. Oh wait, we did and then left and then denied an invite from CUSA.

“Another provision designed to protect the outbound schools: if the PAC-12 conference desolves before August 2026, all 12 current members will share the assets, thus ensuring WSU and OSU can’t shut the lights out and keep the money for themselves”

They have a two year “grace period” from the NCAA to operate as a 2 team league (2024 and 2025). Given the above contractual provision in the settlement, they have to rebuild the PAC-12 (perhaps a reverse merger with some of all of the MWC) by summer 2026 to keep their $250M.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2019
Messages
952
Reaction Score
4,954

“Another provision designed to protect the outbound schools: if the PAC-12 conference desolves before August 2026, all 12 current members will share the assets, thus ensuring WSU and OSU can’t shut the lights out and keep the money for themselves”

They have a two year “grace period” from the NCAA to operate as a 2 team league (2024 and 2025). Given the above contractual provision in the settlement, they have to rebuild the PAC-12 (perhaps a reverse merger with some of all of the MWC) by summer 2026 to keep their $250M.
UConn to the PAC 12, you heard it here first
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,456
Reaction Score
83,469
The fact is there just aren't that many UConn football fans out there. Not nearly enough to fill a fraction of the Rent. What the Hartford-area is full of is though, is straight out football fans that will support the team and buy tickets when the program has an avenue to the big-time. That what sold the program and built the stadium, UConn promised the big-time. And when that promise was fulfilled, the place was packed. And when that was taken away, away went most of the fanbase. It will come back if UConn gets in a real league. Until then, it's just a holding pattern.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
26,191
Reaction Score
31,680
The fact is there just aren't that many UConn football fans out there. Not nearly enough to fill a fraction of the Rent. What the Hartford-area is full of is though, is straight out football fans that will support the team and buy tickets when the program has an avenue to the big-time. That what sold the program and built the stadium, UConn promised the big-time. And when that promise was fulfilled, the place was packed. And when that was taken away, away went most of the fanbase. It will come back if UConn gets in a real league. Until then, it's just a holding pattern.

It just feels like we are slowly starving to death at this point. There aren’t options other than Indy and that’s not helping.
 

shizzle787

King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
11,961
Reaction Score
18,458

“Another provision designed to protect the outbound schools: if the PAC-12 conference desolves before August 2026, all 12 current members will share the assets, thus ensuring WSU and OSU can’t shut the lights out and keep the money for themselves”

They have a two year “grace period” from the NCAA to operate as a 2 team league (2024 and 2025). Given the above contractual provision in the settlement, they have to rebuild the PAC-12 (perhaps a reverse merger with some of all of the MWC) by summer 2026 to keep their $250M.
Key words: before August 2026. They can dissolve the league in September 2026 and keep all the assets. Your interpretation is wrong. Post August 2026, they do not need to rebuild the league especially because they are getting 3.6 M per year from 2026-28 from the CFP.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
65
Reaction Score
194
If the stadium was on campus, the football games would have more attendance and a better atmosphere to present to Conference, but they made the decision to have it in Hartford, which hurts things overall. I work at USC and the football environment is fantastic with alumni and others attending games. I hope UConn finds a home for the football program but we will most likely have to settle for what’s left
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Messages
2,002
Reaction Score
1,733
Key words: before August 2026. They can dissolve the league in September 2026 and keep all the assets. Your interpretation is wrong. Post August 2026, they do not need to rebuild the league especially because they are getting 3.6 M per year from 2026-28 from the CFP.
Your original point was that they had gone independent. They have not. They are in the PAC-2 for two years.
They are not independent.
 

Online statistics

Members online
627
Guests online
5,186
Total visitors
5,813

Forum statistics

Threads
157,034
Messages
4,078,085
Members
9,973
Latest member
WillngtnOak


Top Bottom