- Joined
- Sep 16, 2011
- Messages
- 48,753
- Reaction Score
- 167,239
They would be playing them once a year in football, not marrying them.Because they are rich and opinionated. And Calford alumni might be the most so.
They would be playing them once a year in football, not marrying them.Because they are rich and opinionated. And Calford alumni might be the most so.
Um this may come as a shocker, but those dudes that work at ESPN, they pay taxes too.
I don’t know what to say, but the cultural bifurcation is real, and the gulf between Provo and San Francisco is as wide as ever. Any arrangement seeing Calford in the BXII (and I’m skeptical) will be as short lived as possible. I don’t think a Calford-ACC marriage is long for this world either to be fair, but almost completely due to logistics. If the ACC schools were located where the Big XII schools are, there likely would be nothing to discuss.They would be playing them once a year in football, not marrying them.
I don’t know what to say, but the cultural bifurcation is real, and the gulf between Provo and San Francisco is as wide as ever. Any arrangement seeing Calford in the BXII (and I’m skeptical) will be as short lived as possible. I don’t think a Calford-ACC marriage is long for this world either to be fair, but almost completely due to logistics.
You think Berkeley alumni and BYU alumni think similarly?The cultural bifurcation between the various university leaderships is tiny compared to that of the universities and big chunks of their non-college educated fans.
White collar, college educated people are going to think fairly similarly whether they went to SMU or Baylor or SDSU or UConn.
Nobody cares, they aren't going to be hanging out with each other talking about politics and making policy decisions for each other. They would just be playing each other in a couple of games.You think Berkeley alumni and BYU alumni think similarly?
I think that’s true for 99.9% of college athletics. I don’t think that’s true for Calford in relation to BYU for any indefinite amount of time.Nobody cares, they aren't going to be hanging out with each other talking about politics and making policy decisions for each other. They would just be playing each other in a couple of games.
ESPN has jobs, which is not an unlimited magical resource. ESPN employs 4,000 people in Connecticut, and the state basically pays them to do it by tax breaks. ESPN employees pay income, sales, property tax.Um, this may be even more shocking, but so does everyone else. And the taxes we pay make up for the subsidy their company gets. Our companies for the most part do not get these tax breaks, so their employees are not paying for us
No. I am a big six sigma guy though, and Welch really pushed ruthless efficiency and candor.Wow. This is an exceptionally harsh take. Did you work at GE?
ESPN has jobs, which is not an unlimited magical resource. ESPN employs 4,000 people in Connecticut, and the state basically pays them to do it by tax breaks. ESPN employees pay income, sales, property tax.
Better still, they patronize the tailors, bakers, lawyers, realtors, etc., and accordingly benefit all of those workers and companies by their continued employment. Those folks might not get tax breaks, but are benefits of a rising economic tide
The state should absolutely leverage ESPN to help bring about realignment. But please, let’s introduce some critical thinking here
Much of this is true. But the bottom line is, the total economic impact created by espn far far far outweights the credits it receives. It's a no-brainer doing whatever it takes to keep espn here. Noones pockets are being picked. Plus, espn has done what is required to receive those credits - capital investment, hiring, maintaining - just as may other companies have done. We should try to leverage if possible, but I don't think the state has any leverage.Again, so do we patronize.. And the companies we work for do it without tax breaks. And according to you, it is ok for us to chip in for their tax breaks. I don't know what to tell you, you may enjoy your pocket being picked, but I don't. Or maybe you don't live in CT and have any dog in the fight.
Let's use that critical thinking you mention. Are you saying that place is going to disappear because we took away their tax breaks? 4,000 jobs go woosh? . Billions went into that campus to construct the digital buildings they need. Now that they are trying to to operate on a shoestring budget, they are going to move and pay that all over again for spite?
There has been a worker shortage for quite some time now. Even if they did carry out a threat and moved, many of those people could be absorbed in the state economy anyway
Ultimately, it's time to use the leverage. Add up the amount of money they are costing us in dollars when they easily could have placed us in a power conference by now. This isn't Ball St we are talking about. We are more worthy than half these p4 programs out there. Add who you want Big 12, just make sure UConn is one. ACC, same thing. Just be a team player, a partner while you are reeping our generosity. This is not a big ask. The fact that it has to be leveraged speaks to the evil of that conglomerate
Much of this is true. But the bottom line is, the total economic impact created by espn far far far outweights the credits it receives. It's a no-brainer doing whatever it takes to keep espn here. Noones pockets are being picked. Plus, espn has done what is required to receive those credits - capital investment, hiring, maintaining - just as may other companies have done. We should try to leverage if possible, but I don't think the state has any leverage.
Omg
They would be doing these things anyways
We did not lure them here with credits. They have been invested here from the beginning. They are not going anywhere. Their capital investments have been made.
The only thing to happen after the move this week to add these three schools is for the bubble to burst. This is the sort of senseless, confusing, and quite frankly, pathetic hail mary that signifies the top is in. Its all downhill from here.
The state level investment credits for big business never pay off, and they tend to piss off every company that didn't get them.
Capital and investment credits for small business, particularly in Tech, pay off huge, and Connecticut is one of the five best states in the country at that.
Rule #1 wins again... pretty damn impressive!Looks like we’re officially locked out of expansion until 2036 . Congrats to the ACC and BigXII for effectively killing our football team.
Especially people that don't even live in Connecticut.Isn’t it great how people are willing to sacrifice other people’s jobs so they can show pride?
Our beloved ESPN is giving them 72 million dollars to keep UConn out once again.Looks like we’re officially locked out of expansion until 2036 . Congrats to the ACC and BigXII for effectively killing our football team.
How much money are we talking about here? Do you know specifics? I get the feeling everyone talking about ESPN tax breaks know less about the reality then they do Rent concert curfews.Um, this may be even more shocking, but so does everyone else. And the taxes we pay make up for the subsidy their company gets. Our companies for the most part do not get these tax breaks, so their employees are not paying for us
There's an outside chance it helps us long term, not to be the annoying optimist guy. If Clemson/FSU/whomever bolt before or during 2036, and there's no better seats available for CalFord, you can pretty much bet those schools in particular will not vote to add Boise St or whomever. Hopefully you could put them in the column with some other schools for a UConn+USF addLooks like we’re officially locked out of expansion until 2036 . Congrats to the ACC and BigXII for effectively killing our football team.
While this might very well play out, but the thought of putting our future in the ACC that has screwed us multiple times isn't the best feeling.There's an outside chance it helps us long term, not to be the annoying optimist guy. If Clemson/FSU/whomever bolt before or during 2036, and there's no better seats available for CalFord, you can pretty much bet those schools in particular will not vote to add Boise St or whomever. Hopefully you could put them in the column with some other schools for a UConn+USF add
Or, more ideally, the ACC blows up altogether and something resembling the OBE Football division is rebuilt at that time. I will also be driving one of my eighteen Ferraris