Clingan on the bench game after game | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Clingan on the bench game after game

Status
Not open for further replies.

Huskyforlife

Akokbouk
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
12,182
Reaction Score
49,528
Your post wasn't very worthy. Just snitty. On offense Jackson doesn't draw any defenders making the game harder for everyone else. Clingan draws multiple defenders making the game easier for everyone else. We own the paint with him in the game and he draws fouls. How stupid that anyone should point this out and want him on the court. Creighton beat a more capable team because their coach reinforced a game plan to take advantage of Jackson's offensive weaknesses and Hurley's stubborness. They both took the bait and we lost. I think your snitty post is dead wrong.
I’m not seeing anything here that disproves my point. They both have positive impacts on the boards and defense. Swapping one for the other doesn’t solve our spacing problems on offense, or our playmaking issues. It makes our perimeter defense significantly worse, while making our rim defense significantly better, that’s really it. But you also have to understand you’re asking Sanogo to start defending perimeter guys in a way he never has before consistently since he’s been here, if you demand him to share the floor with Clingan. And if there’s people still suggesting Clingan is better than Sanogo, I don’t think we’re watching the same games.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
48,967
Reaction Score
168,683
I’m not seeing anything here that disproves my point. They both have positive impacts on the boards and defense. Swapping one for the other doesn’t solve our spacing problems on offense, or our playmaking issues. It makes our perimeter defense significantly worse, while making our rim defense significantly better, that’s really it. But you also have to understand you’re asking Sanogo to start defending perimeter guys in a way he never has before consistently since he’s been here, if you demand him to share the floor with Clingan. And if there’s people still suggesting Clingan is better than Sanogo, I don’t think we’re watching the same games.
Clingan gets twice as many rebounds as Jackson, Clingan draws multiple players who have to guard him, Clingan draws 5 times as many fouls as Jackson does. Nobody guards Jackson because they want to bait Jackson into trying to score, this makes it 4 on 5 basketball for our offense and it makes the 4 guys who can score struggle because they're dealing with another defender. If you can't see this I don't think we're watching the same games.

Nobody on this board has ever said this season they want Sanogo and Clingan on the court at the same time for the whole game but it's obvious to many Clingan has gotten shafted on minutes more than any other player on this team. It took most of the season for Hurley to figure out he has to use Sanogo differently on the floor offensively for him to be more effective, he still hasn't figured it out with Jackson and hasn't figured out Clingan needs to play more.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2022
Messages
155
Reaction Score
591
Anyone who thinks Clingan would’ve done a better job than Sanogo obviously wasn’t watching the same game. Sanogo was the mvp of that game for us. Clingan was fine in his limited minutes against the backup, but we were also generating offense for him as opposed to Sanogo generating offense for us.
You’re so brainwashed by thinking they can only co-exist by swapping for each other. It’s not about playing one over the other it’s about playing your best players. How can you watch todays game and think Clingan deserves 7 minutes. PLAY YOUR BEST PLAYERS and let teams adjust to you. Hurley plays to other teams strengths and it’s infuriating
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,635
Reaction Score
97,056
Clingan hasn’t been that good in awhile, if we’re being honest. Growing pains.

That’s not honest at all. 4 points and 7 rebounds in 7 minutes? Lol that’s not good? I mean Sanogo was real good today our best starter easily. But you watch that game and please note the times he didn’t help on D or he tried and they score near the basket because he can’t block shots. If they’re both in I promise you even with his freshman mistakes he blocks 3-4 more of those or makes them miss those just because he’s 7’2. 15 minutes from DC somehow, with a creative coach we win.

And to make it worst your “growing pains” will still be there next year because our coach doesn’t let him get minutes. And again, even with growing pains he’s a more impactful player than a couple others that get WAY too many minutes. Some have “growing pains” 3 years later and don’t impact that game like he did.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,536
Reaction Score
66,964
There are games for double big, but yesterday wasn't it.

It's incredible how many of you only consider half the court. You want Sanogo to guard Kaluma? Or Baylor freaking Scheierman? They'd eat him alive and drive right by him or run him off screens. For the marginal offense improvement, we'd be giving more back on defense. That's the primary reason it can't work often. Sanogo is not a versatile defender. He's heavy and slow.

And then on offense, everyone is mad that Andre Jackson's guy is in the paint. Guess where the 2nd big defender would be?

If Sanogo is actually going to be a 40% 3pt shooter, that does help, but he needs space to operate in the post. He's a pivot guy and more recently facing up and driving to setup the move. He needs the space to move around guys. That's one of the reasons double teams hurt him so much, it limits his space. Having a bigger big in the game who can't space the floor is not going to help him. If Clingan were Nunge with his shot, sure. But he's not there yet. Sanogo is not Toubelis to really take advantage of big to big passing. He doesn't have the same passing ability or creativity. He's still working on it.

This is not fantasy football. You can't just run out a lineup of your "best" players and expect them to be the same together as they are playing in better contexts, especially on defense. They make each other worse.

Recall how much better offensively Whaley was when her played as the lone center vs as a 4 man next to Sanogo.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,635
Reaction Score
97,056
There are games for double big, but yesterday wasn't it.

It's incredible how many of you only consider half the court. You want Sanogo to guard Kaluma? Or Baylor freaking Scheierman? They'd eat him alive and drive right by him or run him off screens. For the marginal offense improvement, we'd be giving more back on defense. That's the primary reason it can't work often. Sanogo is not a versatile defender. He's heavy and slow.

And then on offense, everyone is mad that Andre Jackson's guy is in the paint. Guess where the 2nd big defender would be?

If Sanogo is actually going to be a 40% 3pt shooter, that does help, but he needs space to operate in the post. He's a pivot guy and more recently facing up and driving to setup the move. He needs the space to move around guys. That's one of the reasons double teams hurt him so much, it limits his space. Having a bigger big in the game who can't space the floor is not going to help him. If Clingan were Nunge with his shot, sure. But he's not there yet. Sanogo is not Toubelis to really take advantage of big to big passing. He doesn't have the same passing ability or creativity. He's still working on it.

This is not fantasy football. You can't just run out a lineup of your "best" players and expect them to be the same together as they are playing in better contexts, especially on defense. They make each other worse.

Recall how much better offensively Whaley was when her played as the lone center vs as a 4 man next to Sanogo.

How much worst can they be than getting 56? C’mon you have to try making the other team adjust too. We didn’t again we let them let one man help wherever he felt impacted each possession and it worked.

Play zone put your best players on the floor and try to make them guard everyone. It can’t hurt when you’re not scoring anyway.

And Alleyne would’ve made them guard everyone too. He should’ve seen some more minutes. Loose rebounding yes but that’s it, he can defend and defended real well again yesterday.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,536
Reaction Score
66,964
How much worst can they be than getting 56? C’mon you have to try making the other team adjust too. We didn’t again we let them let one man help wherever he felt impacted each possession and it worked.

Play zone put your best players on the floor and try to make them guard everyone. It can’t hurt when you’re not scoring anyway.

And Alleyne would’ve made them guard everyone too. He should’ve seen some more minutes. Loose rebounding yes but that’s it, he can defend and defended real well again yesterday.
Alleyne was in during crunch-time. So the adjustment was made. He wasn't particularly effective on offense, but he was in there.

I think playing both bigs the offense would've been better and the defense a lot worse, in this game specifically. A zone defense would've been a lot worse than our defense yesterday, too.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,635
Reaction Score
97,056
Alleyne was in during crunch-time. So the adjustment was made. He wasn't particularly effective on offense, but he was in there.

I think the offense would've been better and the defense a lot worse, in this game specifically. A zone defense would've been a lot worse than our defense yesterday, too.

How do we know? You have to try to get your best scorers in when you can’t score the ball. It’s not like we’ve won close games because we defended better they did we had 3 less. So maybe try to score more to offset it? I’m just saying TRY.

And no Alleyne wasn’t in late game it was mostly AJ and Diarra which is beyond ridiculous. He came out of the time out with Diarra in the line up with us taking the ball in bounds that’s horrific, no excuse.
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Messages
3,168
Reaction Score
6,291
I’m not seeing anything here that disproves my point. They both have positive impacts on the boards and defense. Swapping one for the other doesn’t solve our spacing problems on offense, or our playmaking issues. It makes our perimeter defense significantly worse, while making our rim defense significantly better, that’s really it. But you also have to understand you’re asking Sanogo to start defending perimeter guys in a way he never has before consistently since he’s been here, if you demand him to share the floor with Clingan. And if there’s people still suggesting Clingan is better than Sanogo, I don’t think we’re watching the same games.
When Josh Boone and Hilton Armstrong shared the floor together, was either asked to guard perimeter players 18 feet from the hoop? If Calhoun was still the coach, Clingan would definitely be starting some games. What the team gains by having both on floor far outweighs anything they’re giving up.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,194
Reaction Score
15,413
There are games for double big, but yesterday wasn't it.

It's incredible how many of you only consider half the court. You want Sanogo to guard Kaluma? Or Baylor freaking Scheierman? They'd eat him alive and drive right by him or run him off screens. For the marginal offense improvement, we'd be giving more back on defense. That's the primary reason it can't work often. Sanogo is not a versatile defender. He's heavy and slow.

And then on offense, everyone is mad that Andre Jackson's guy is in the paint. Guess where the 2nd big defender would be?

If Sanogo is actually going to be a 40% 3pt shooter, that does help, but he needs space to operate in the post. He's a pivot guy and more recently facing up and driving to setup the move. He needs the space to move around guys. That's one of the reasons double teams hurt him so much, it limits his space. Having a bigger big in the game who can't space the floor is not going to help him. If Clingan were Nunge with his shot, sure. But he's not there yet. Sanogo is not Toubelis to really take advantage of big to big passing. He doesn't have the same passing ability or creativity. He's still working on it.

This is not fantasy football. You can't just run out a lineup of your "best" players and expect them to be the same together as they are playing in better contexts, especially on defense. They make each other worse.

Recall how much better offensively Whaley was when her played as the lone center vs as a 4 man next to Sanogo.
We scored 53 points.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
948
Reaction Score
1,664
There are games for double big, but yesterday wasn't it.

It's incredible how many of you only consider half the court. You want Sanogo to guard Kaluma? Or Baylor freaking Scheierman? They'd eat him alive and drive right by him or run him off screens. For the marginal offense improvement, we'd be giving more back on defense. That's the primary reason it can't work often. Sanogo is not a versatile defender. He's heavy and slow.

And then on offense, everyone is mad that Andre Jackson's guy is in the paint. Guess where the 2nd big defender would be?

If Sanogo is actually going to be a 40% 3pt shooter, that does help, but he needs space to operate in the post. He's a pivot guy and more recently facing up and driving to setup the move. He needs the space to move around guys. That's one of the reasons double teams hurt him so much, it limits his space. Having a bigger big in the game who can't space the floor is not going to help him. If Clingan were Nunge with his shot, sure. But he's not there yet. Sanogo is not Toubelis to really take advantage of big to big passing. He doesn't have the same passing ability or creativity. He's still working on it.

This is not fantasy football. You can't just run out a lineup of your "best" players and expect them to be the same together as they are playing in better contexts, especially on defense. They make each other worse.

Recall how much better offensively Whaley was when her played as the lone center vs as a 4 man next to Sanogo.
“There are games for double big but yesterday wasn’t it”. I don’t want to have to be the one to have to break the bad news to you but THEY LOST. By the smallest of margins so any number of small in game adjustments would have been enough to WIN the game, like at the end of a very close game the stubborn stupid UConn coach did just enough Predictably stupid things like leaving Jackson in the game and letting him shoot which is exactly what the opposing coach wanted him to do. Trade coaches and we win the game probably by a lot. When someone tells you who he is ( over and over) you might want to believe him, Hurley might be a good recruiter but he’s a terrible in game coach. You all make fun of Syracuse but they win tournament games. what has Hurley won. They jay not win championships but they win tourney games. Hurley is o fer 2 with the higher ranked team. We had the better team yesterday. He managed to take a 14/0 start and turn it into a 4/7 stretch. Remember the Seton Hall game, not putting your best biggest rebounder shot blocker in for the last shot,
St. John’s, guarding the worst perimeter shooting team in the league on the 3 point line and letting them score in the paint at will and getting blown out at home. He’s not the sharpest tack in the box. ( for 4 million dollars a year). The man’s in over his head . He’s treating DC like all the other players who didn’t get any playing time last year ( DC won MVP of a early season national tournament against some serious competition and now he gets to play 7 minutes so Jackson can prove over and over again for the 3rd year he can’t shoot and while every coach in America knows this the resident genius ( I kid) coach of our team is just too stupid and stubborn to coach a team at this level. Trade coach’s with 1/2 of the teams in the BE with this team and we’d be challenging for a top 2 finish. 2/21 in close games is all the proof any reasonable person would need to realize we’re being handicapped by consistently bad game prep and in game coaching. We have arguably the best talent in the league and we have a 7/7 record.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,602
Reaction Score
12,564
When Clingan plays 15 minutes or more in a game, we are 8-2. He averages 13.4 points, 8.7 rebounds and 3 blocks on 78% shooting in those games in 18 minutes per game.

Its not just vs the crappy teams too. When going against the Kenpom top 100 on 15+ minutes (Iowa State, Oregon, Florida, Providence, Marquette) He averages 14.4/9.4/3.2 on 73% shooting in 19 minutes per game.

I know its not practical as a full-time lineup, but given how bad Jackson is on offense you can't tell me Hurley can't go double big for 3-4 minutes a half.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,290
Reaction Score
30,908
It baffles me that a kid with Andre's athleticism practices every day and still looks so uncomfortable in terms of scoring. Even a couple layups of the glass each game would make teams respect him a little and open things up for Hawkins and Karaban to get better looks.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,635
Reaction Score
97,056
“There are games for double big but yesterday wasn’t it”. I don’t want to have to be the one to have to break the bad news to you but THEY LOST. By the smallest of margins so any number of small in game adjustments would have been enough to WIN the game, like at the end of a very close game the stubborn stupid UConn coach did just enough Predictably stupid things like leaving Jackson in the game and letting him shoot which is exactly what the opposing coach wanted him to do. Trade coaches and we win the game probably by a lot. When someone tells you who he is ( over and over) you might want to believe him, Hurley might be a good recruiter but he’s a terrible in game coach. You all make fun of Syracuse but they win tournament games. what has Hurley won. They jay not win championships but they win tourney games. Hurley is o fer 2 with the higher ranked team. We had the better team yesterday. He managed to take a 14/0 start and turn it into a 4/7 stretch. Remember the Seton Hall game, not putting your best biggest rebounder shot blocker in for the last shot,
St. John’s, guarding the worst perimeter shooting team in the league on the 3 point line and letting them score in the paint at will and getting blown out at home. He’s not the sharpest tack in the box. ( for 4 million dollars a year). The man’s in over his head . He’s treating DC like all the other players who didn’t get any playing time last year ( DC won MVP of a early season national tournament against some serious competition and now he gets to play 7 minutes so Jackson can prove over and over again for the 3rd year he can’t shoot and while every coach in America knows this the resident genius ( I kid) coach of our team is just too stupid and stubborn to coach a team at this level. Trade coach’s with 1/2 of the teams in the BE with this team and we’d be challenging for a top 2 finish. 2/21 in close games is all the proof any reasonable person would need to realize we’re being handicapped by consistently bad game prep and in game coaching. We have arguably the best talent in the league and we have a 7/7 record.

“They are taking the shots we want them to take so keep doing that…” McDermott live feed in huddle.

Well yes guess he was right. Good news is we made him happy!
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2011
Messages
1,399
Reaction Score
15,128
Clingan Minutes 14-0
19-12-18-12-16 19-11-18 7-19-15 (7 min vs Ok St Post game Hurley said s/b more)

Big East 7 games under 10 minutes
Xavier 7 and 7
Creighton 9 and 7
Lost all 3 games where he only played 7 minutes.

He's only committed 4 fouls in 3 games (St Johns & Seton Hall where there were a couple phantom fouls in back to back games). He draws fouls on opponents and we let Xavier & Creighton skate.

It's cringe worthy that Hurley's post game comments basically suggest he was totally satisfied with our strategy and shot selection. He explains, Alexander made a couple tough shots, and we didn't convert on a couple multi-shot possessions. In his mind everything else was fine. Dominance on the road isn't expected, but not seeing his own culpability might explain 1-12 road record vs the top of the conference in his tenure.

Play the biggest guy in the league at least 15 minutes and play him near the basket on offense and in the lane on defense. Play shooters with the guy so he can pass inside out. Let him punch you in the face if he gets less minutes and after a couple games, if you've regained consciousness, you'll remember.
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2013
Messages
1,471
Reaction Score
9,738
If Jackson ever takes more than 6-7 shots in a game again this year I’m going to lose my mind. If we let Karaban take more shots we would’ve won that game. As others have pointed out, Jackson is killing our offense because it allows teams to either clog the paint and play 20 feet off of AJax or allows them to hang at the top of the key waiting on Hawkins or Karaban to come off a screen. It also means that Jackson can’t be the screener, which puts more pressure on Karaban/Sanogo to set the screens. Basically the only time we can generate a decent offensive set with Jackson in there is if Jackson is buried in the corner and we run some action on the opposite side of the court. I’m not a coach or a basketball expert and even I can clearly see this isn’t working. One way I see around this is to just let AJax keep running the baseline back and forth and if his guy isn’t playing him right throw a lob for the dunk. Other than that, if he can’t hit shots he needs to sit. Not sure why Andre decided he was going to have his offensive coming out party against the 2 top teams in the league (Xavier/Creighton). He single handedly lost us both those games. I love Jackson and he does make this team go from very good to elite when he’s on, but man he’s such a liability on offense.
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Messages
3,168
Reaction Score
6,291
Clingans ability to rebound, score and defend against the layup more than negates some of the minutes Andre has been getting. It’s absurd he will be going into next season with so few minutes under his belt.
Clingan’s moves around the basket with one big defending him, are impressive for a freshman. I remember one game he faked one big out of his shoes with a reverse layup and jammed it on the other side. Sanogo couldn’t do that in a million years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
326
Guests online
2,218
Total visitors
2,544

Forum statistics

Threads
157,342
Messages
4,095,301
Members
9,985
Latest member
stanfordnyc


Top Bottom