CL82
NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 57,044
- Reaction Score
- 209,322
lol....I thought we couldn't do GIFs anymore.
Last edited:
lol....I thought we couldn't do GIFs anymore.
wow - you got me wrong I am not a hater...how many times can I tell you this.You ran away...
but I have a suggestion where to run to:
Start a Haters Whining Crying thread. I promise I won't respond to anything said in it.
Bonehead can be the top poster there.
I never said there's evidence of something fishy happening - only that destroying your phone and McNally's text make Brady look guilty (at least in the eyes of people who want him to be).I agree with a lot of your post, but don't understand the following:
How is there evidence of something fishy happening when it is (highly) likely no infraction in the first place?
You need a 'wordmark.' I suggest:http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity...chen-threatened-tom-brady-with-divorce-201529
So is Gisele! We're brands now. Butch™.
I never said there's evidence of something fishy happening - only that destroying your phone and McNally's text make Brady look guilty (at least in the eyes of people who want him to be).
What's he guilty of? No idea. Probably not deflating footballs, though.
What's really remarkable is that Kraft bent over and took a hard one on this. I not complaining since I am still bitter about the non-move to Hartford, but I really thought the fix was in with Brady and that's why he didn't challenge the sanctions. Goodell went out of way to smear and sanction Brady even after Kraft made nice with him. This whole this has been a cluster fawk.There's enough here to think something shady happened...such as Brady destroying his phone and the "deflator" text. And there's also zero proof the footballs were below the legal limit.
All in all, it begs the question: what the duckk are we even debating about?
It's truly remarkable how much the NFL screwed this one up yet again. That's the real story here.
What's really remarkable is that Kraft bent over and took a hard one on this. I not complaining since I am still bitter about the non-move to Hartford, but I really thought the fix was in with Bardy and that's why he didn't challenge the sanctions.
Any time now you can start theWhining Crying Haters thread. Trust me, you won't be alone in your posts.
Ill start that thread the same day I start the 'Joe Paterno was a good catholic' thread...
As usual, no one knows what you're talking about. Stop taking hallucinatories before posting.
No the ruling was about a lack of tangible basis for punishment. That doesn't clear Brady per se, but it does say that the NFL after half a year and millions of dollars had, well a couple of idiots' ambiguous texts and a complete disregard for experts testimony.again - the Brady ruling is about perceived 'fair' punishment and NOT guilt or innocence.
Kraft gave up a million dollars and a #1 for NFL parity and NOT because anyone employed by the Pats were doing things considered illegal to the NFL.
Don't be foolish...you know I wont start the Joe Paterno good catholic thread, like you have claimed he was, so it was in reference to expecting the Crying thread - come on, if I need to explain everything to you, we are destined for ignore status.
You defend the innocent - the Tom Bradys, the Joe Paternos and the OJ Simpsons of the world.
There's enough here to think something shady happened...such as Brady destroying his phone and the "deflator" text. And there's also zero proof the footballs were below the legal limit.
All in all, it begs the question: what the duckk are we even debating about?
It's truly remarkable how much the NFL screwed this one up yet again. That's the real story here.
No the ruling was about a lack of tangible basis for punishment. That doesn't clear Brady per se, but it does say that the NFL after half a year and millions of dollars had, well a couple of idiots' ambiguous texts and a complete disregard for experts testimony.
If this was normal company, the bloodbath of firings for investing so much time and money with nothing to show for it would be epic.
With all due respect I disagree...I read about 12-15 pages and again I came away with the punishment doesn't fit the crime more that tangible basis - but I am open to seeing it your way?
Read the damn court proceedings and stopped being such a biased dummy on this.
The judge ripped the NFL apart on deflation.
Read the ruling.
1. Berman’s direct and strident questioning of NFL attorney Dan Nash about evidence of ball deflation had to be concerning to the NFL. Although the appellate review was supposed to be more about process than evidence, Berman asked about what direct evidence the NFL had of deflation and of Brady’s involvement, beyond the circumstantial evidence raised in the Wells report. The NFL attorneys had to be shaking their heads at a line of inquiry questioning the evidence the league spent $3 million to collect.
I hadn't seen it before your post and won't get a chance to really look at until tomorrow evening, but Berman's basis for the ruling is procedural (see pages 20 and 21) because in a judicial review of an arbitration, the judge doesn't make rulings about findings of fact, but there are plenty of good nuggets in there that will severely curtail the NFL's ability to sanction Brady.With all due respect I disagree...I read about 12-15 pages and again I came away with the punishment doesn't fit the crime more that tangible basis - but I am open to seeing it your way?