I always worked in environments that viewed legal action/lawsuits as a last resort; and then only in cases involving intellectual property and/or infringement. I learned that the guy yelling about suing was probably trying to cover his own shortcomings.
But, I'm still steamed about the unfairness of UCONN's APR related punishment; steamed enough to, if I worked at UCONN, react violently to any "wrist slap" type ornamentation 'n NCAA might choose as UNC's punishment.
I'd call Skadden, Arps, et al (worked on NCAA stuff) and see if we could get an NCAA person, under oath, to explain the punishment
logic associated with UCONN's (
honestly reported bad grades on real subjects leading to abysmal APR's) vs UNC's (many years and players with phony courses and, therefore, phony grades leading to appropriate APR's and player eligibility). The logic applied to each case would be interesting as all hell. Funny, too, I'll bet.