Conference Realignment Post Mortem Thread | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Conference Realignment Post Mortem Thread

Joined
Feb 6, 2022
Messages
473
Reaction Score
1,642
Correct me if I'm wrong, but as these Power Conferences become 18,20, 24, won't it become increasingly difficult for Uconn to get future games scheduled against these conferences ? To me it looks a bit concerning for future scheduling. Hope I'm wrong.
Yes. You have 9 -10 conference games which only leaves 2 -3 out of conference for the P4 teams. UConn will need to leverage basketball to get quality football games.
 
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
914
Reaction Score
2,786
Yes. You have 9 -10 conference games which only leaves 2 -3 out of conference for the P4 teams. UConn will need to leverage basketball to get quality football games.
How often does that actually happen?
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2022
Messages
473
Reaction Score
1,642
Yes. You have 9 -10 conference games which only leaves 2 -3 out of conference for the P4 teams. UConn will need to leverage basketball to get quality
How often does that actually happen?
Big 12 and Big 10 just added four schools to their conference. We’ll have to wait and see how many conference games they will schedule. Podcasters were assuming more conference games.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
55
Reaction Score
330
Correct me if I'm wrong, but as these Power Conferences become 18,20, 24, won't it become increasingly difficult for Uconn to get future games scheduled against these conferences ? To me it looks a bit concerning for future scheduling. Hope I'm wrong.
So, if they get to 18, 20+ members they're only going to do that from absorbing the ACC or grabbing teams from other conferences. If they absorb the ACC, we don't know what will happen but it is likely that there would be teams left out (e.g., Wake, BC, Cuse) for us to potentially include in the BE or merge with. If they expand outside of the ACC, Uconn would have to be a good candidate because there ain't much else out there.
 
Joined
Oct 3, 2016
Messages
449
Reaction Score
638
We might have to schedule BCU & SU and others by agreeing to play 2 out 3 games at their stadiums. I think we should schedule Navy home and home to go along with Army.

Our biggest threat is BCU actually getting their act together and hiring a competent coach.
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
16,706
Reaction Score
19,931
The fact that UConn MBB is playing four regular season games at Madison Square Garden (I presume one of them will be vs St Johns) is something to take note of. They are proactively claiming NYC as their market by being there frequently so when markets are in play in future negotiations, they are well positioned to harp on that in a legitimate fashion. That fact that WBB games are on SNY is another plus for connections there. There's no guarantee this strategy will pay dividends but at least it's an attempt to distinguish themselves within their home market and be propped up by NYC too when the next wave of expansion or realignment transpires. Certainly they can claim more presence in the NYC market than the lottery winning Rutgers programs can.

Granted your post was directed at football, but success and UConn butts in the seats at the "world's most famous arena" isn't a bad thing to promote.
These are great sentiments and we' d all like to believe these actions actually matter. If there's one thing we've learned over and over again, "basketball doesn't matter" is a huge understatement.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
20,541
Reaction Score
44,624
I don’t know that a couple of extra wins by Mora will move the needle that much. Colorado’s football program has been a dumpster fire for its entire history, and it gets to jump to whatever league it wants. ASU and Utah are redundant from a market perspective, and both beat out UConn in this round of realignment. 8-4 vs 7-5 is not going to matter.

The Transfer Portal and NIL will flatten out talent, so UConn can continue to be competitive on the field if it wants to commit to it. The bigger issue is that UConn has to figure out a way to dominate the northeast market from BCU and Syracuse, and do it in a way that is objectively measurable. Leveraging basketball can go a long way to this. Subscriptions through a streaming service is one way, but I am sure there are others. Until conferences think that they must have UConn to be in the northeast, we will never be in a major conference.
I like this post, but if you're in the P5 club you are viewed differently than a G5 school. G5 to P5 you it has been shown you need to demonstrate excellence. Not easy and takes financial commitment.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
55
Reaction Score
330
We might have to schedule BCU & SU and others by agreeing to play 2 out 3 games at their stadiums. I think we should schedule Navy home and home to go along with Army.

Our biggest threat is BCU actually getting their act together and hiring a competent coach.
BC are scoundrels, but I've come to view rival competition as a good thing. Sure I know that we'd lose out on some recruits but overall I think it would benefit BC, Syracuse and Uconn if the three programs were good and had energetic rivals. That truly would build interest in college football in the North East.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
2,459
Reaction Score
4,612
The fact that UConn MBB is playing four regular season games at Madison Square Garden (I presume one of them will be vs St Johns) is something to take note of. They are proactively claiming NYC as their market by being there frequently so when markets are in play in future negotiations, they are well positioned to harp on that in a legitimate fashion. That fact that WBB games are on SNY is another plus for connections there. There's no guarantee this strategy will pay dividends but at least it's an attempt to distinguish themselves within their home market and be propped up by NYC too when the next wave of expansion or realignment transpires. Certainly they can claim more presence in the NYC market than the lottery winning Rutgers programs can.

Granted your post was directed at football, but success and UConn butts in the seats at the "world's most famous arena" isn't a bad thing to promote.
Clearly it is meaningless in conference realignment. UConn fans could occupy every seat in MSG and it would not make a difference in getting into a power conference.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
2,459
Reaction Score
4,612
Every time I see those announcements of UConn playing at MSG, I laugh and I hope that Brett Yormark chokes on them. I guess you could say I'm bitter LOL. I think I quoted Yormark's remarks about basketball and NYC more than anyone.
It was all a scam.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
430
Reaction Score
1,679
I think post mortem is premature. Look how much the conference landscape has changed in just the last month.
In the P2 or P4 or whatever it becomes there are and will always be football centric and basketball centric schools. Rarely do you see both and it doesn’t last long (ie Michigan, Florida). Clearly Bama, USC, and Penn St are football centric.
UCONN needs to recognize we are now and will likely always fall into the basketball centric category. Kentucky is already P2. Kansas and North Carolina are P4. By all measures NC has positioned themselves for a B1G invite. We need to look like them.
How? Continue 3 - 4 independent seasons and dominate by year 4 by beating all G5 level competition and occasionally upset some big boys. Hopefully that leads to a G5 football only invite. Then dominate that league to open an invite to Big XII or ACC. Then start to represent like UNC and see what happens.
Mora so far looks like someone who may be able to navigate that but if we have a crappy season we’ll all be calling for his firing. The AD needs to act quick and with credibility. Mora’s age and credentials are not that far off from PP when hired.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2022
Messages
287
Reaction Score
1,031
If something’s worth doing, it’s worth doing well. Win football games, regardless of the opponent and the football program fits well within the excellence of the overall athletic department. That’s the key moving forward for any expansion bid. We lost our way in football (and MBB for that matter) not getting the initial invite. Interest, $, and competitiveness bottomed out. Regardless of the conference or schedule, find your lane, win with the resources you have, and interest follows. Don’t be an outlier in your own athletic department. Men’s and women’s soccer, you’re on notice, btw.

Yeah, I’m the weirdo who looks at how all UConn teams and student-athletes fare.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2022
Messages
287
Reaction Score
1,031
One more point about football: Playing winnable games at home under the Indy flag with Mora at the helm for the next few years means 1) competitive football 2) not emptying your wallet to enjoy a game 3) underdogs to root for - especially some of these overachieving kids 4) a tasty tailgate if you so choose.

There are worse ways to spend a Saturday (or Thursday night). My hope is we average a real 20+k. The kids deserve at least that when they’re putting out.
 
Joined
Oct 16, 2022
Messages
366
Reaction Score
571
Clearly it is meaningless in conference realignment. UConn fans could occupy every seat in MSG and it would not make a difference in getting into a power conference.
This recent shuffling shows that NYC market presence is far from meaningless, but it was also not sufficient on its own either. Were it not for that fact, UConn would not even have been sniffed out as a candidate for the B12. It took the total collapse of a 100+ year athletic conference to deny them a seat. Far from meaningless…
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2021
Messages
1,525
Reaction Score
7,122
I will be and I imagine more people than we've had buying them over the past half dozen years.

I imagine from your handle that you will be attending games. I personally believe that as winning becomes a more consistent part of the program our attendance will increase but it needs to increase but quite a bit, and it needs to be due to fans showing up to watch UConn more than because of who the opponent is.

The message that needs to be sent to the entirety of our fans bases and alumni base:

If you are a fan of the school and want what's best for it's future, go to UConn football games.
If you are a fan of the men's basketball program and want what's best for it's future, go to UConn football games.
If you are a fan of the women's basketball program and want what's best for it's future, go to UConn football games.
If you are a fan of the baseball, hockey or soccer programs and want what's best for their future, go to UConn football games.
I don’t think that dog hunts anymore. That message was used for a decade to keep football from total collapse. The diehard football fan base hung with the team when it was just throwing away money. They must put a better product on the field which includes scheduling quality opponents.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,355
Reaction Score
3,819
It was all a scam.
No it was never a scam. Yormark had us in the conversation. Until the announcement of the Pac12 tv deal, it was not a sure thing that the league would blow up. I can't blame Yormark for taking the AZ schools and Utah, that's probably what Big12 AD's preferred, given our football team's poor recent history-that part is our own fault.

Yormark promoted us, but in the end it's the school AD's/Admin's who choose who to accept. Sure we're disappointed, but conference realignment is not over (ACC) and there will be more shuffling. We'll get there eventually. I have a lot of confidence in our current coaches and AD Dave.

Now let's put some butts in the seats and win some games!
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Messages
7,425
Reaction Score
27,736
No it was never a scam. Yormark had us in the conversation. Until the announcement of the Pac12 tv deal, it was not a sure thing that the league would blow up. I can't blame Yormark for taking the AZ schools and Utah, that's probably what Big12 AD's preferred, given our football team's poor recent history-that part is our own fault.

Yormark promoted us, but in the end it's the school AD's/Admin's who choose who to accept. Sure we're disappointed, but conference realignment is not over (ACC) and there will be more shuffling. We'll get there eventually. I have a lot of confidence in our current coaches and AD Dave.

Now let's put some butts in the seats and win some games!
By the time we get there it won't matter.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
2,459
Reaction Score
4,612
By the time we get there it won't matter.
When Yormark mentioned UConn in his final statement, UConn was linked with Gonzaga. I am wondering if it was a basketball only invite. That would not have been helpful to UConn at all. He toyed with us. The Big 12 door has been shut to UConn now as they likely will wait until ACC schools become available and they will take precedence over UConn, leaving UConn shut out again. AD Dave has been silent as he likely feels betrayed as well. This was a devastating blow, at least for me....and with all the talk of Calford to the ACC, UConn not even in the conversation. It even looks like the ACC will take SMU as well! Unbelievable!
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
12,297
Reaction Score
42,071
I don’t think that dog hunts anymore. That message was used for a decade to keep football from total collapse. The diehard football fan base hung with the team when it was just throwing away money. They must put a better product on the field which includes scheduling quality opponents.

Last year was a start, in fact, it was a far better start than most could have hoped for. Yes, regardless of intent, there was a half decade stretch where if the the goal had been to completely destroy the program they appeared to be succeeding but we should see steady improvement going forward and by the middle of year four in the Mora era (if not sooner) we will have quite a few ranking votes.

Well, hosting both NC St and Duke has to have some value and Utah St finished the year in the top 20 not long ago. USF is a decent program for the fourth best home opponent (for what we currently are, a basically insignificant independent) while FIU is acceptable (at the moment) as the fifth best (although the hope is that the day will arrive where a school like this will be the worst home opponent on the schedule). It may take time for the administration to eliminate an FCS opponent on the schedule each year but as this had been standard practice even when we were at our best, it is difficult to complain too much about Sacred Heart.

Hopefully you aren't one of the detractors who, after everything, will reply "but to make it worthwhile we'll need to schedule x amount of ranked teams at home.", followed by "yeah, but we should be able to bring in this big name or that big name regularly if we expect our fan base to be interested". I'm fully aware that there are some for who nothing will ever be good enough. Please don't be one of them.

I'll make a deal with you, pick a game, this year, next year, whenever, I'll provide the tickets and the tailgate (plenty of good food and drink). The only thing it will cost you is getting to and from the Rent and the time needed for the tailgate & game. If afterward you view it as worth the effort, you'll go to a stray game on your own dime and ask some friends to consider doing the same. If it doesn't end up being worth the effort in your eyes, you will have at least had some good food and drink for the time invested.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
26,191
Reaction Score
31,680
I've seen this conversation pop-up across different threads and thought it needed a better home. I'm ready to move on, but also think its interesting to reflect on what has transpired now that things have cooled off. A couple of my observations:

1) Uconn is in pretty good shape today. We're not in a P5, but compare us to our old rivals: Syracuse, Pitt, Rutgers, BC and West Virginia. I'd argue that we've built our brand more, have better coaches and more athletic success than the group. Sure those schools benefit from better conference contracts, but from a 'Cuse POV (for example), we were near equals in basketball in the early 2,000's and now Uconn is a truly national brand, a Blue Blood and 'Cuse is in the wilderness. Nobody has even heard of BC at this point. It isn't unreasonable to make the case that "we won" in the end.

2) Schools missed the point. Traditional rivalries really matter. If CR is all about $$$, and $$$ is about eyes on TVs - you have to have exciting athletics. You only get that with games that matter. This I think is why Uconn floundered in the AAC and our old rivals are largely irrelevant today. Nothing would be better for Syracuse and Pitt than to be in the BE and play Uconn in the Garden. Yet I remember when they left the BE they widely declared how they fit better culturally, academically, etc. with the ACC. How's that working out for ya?

3) Getting to a P5 in the long-term is important. Though I'm glad we'll likely have at least a few more years of BE conference tournaments and interesting independent fball schedules, there is too much risk out there to assume we'll be able to keep up with the P5s in the long-term. I'm talking about facilities, coaches, NIL AND issues like access to national championships and tournaments. My assumption is that we need to be looking pretty strong / attractive at least a couple of years before 2036 at the very latest, but maybe much sooner. I think 10 years of decent football play (average years, plus a few years with strong records), crowds and name building would put us in the best position possible for long-term realignment. Building our brand into NY during this time wouldn't hurt. I don't know how to square this with #2 above since I do think changing conferences will ultimately hurt Uconn in a different kind of way. I think this is what is at the heart of the debates we've all had in this forum...we kind of all recognize that while we need the money, we may find that the games don't matter too much anymore and there is less to care about.

4) Change may happen sooner. To me it seems that the B12 may come knocking the next year or two. I also believe the ACC would be foolish to not target Uconn. They're falling behind in numbers and there aren't a hell of a lot of possible schools left.

The ACC does not want UConn.

Repeat this to yourself as often as it takes to get this to finally register.

Maybe someday in the late 2030s we’ll be in a place with whoever gets left out from old ACC.

Maybe not.

What we have today is the way. Nobody else is coming.
 

BlueandOG

We are not amused.
Joined
May 5, 2015
Messages
1,482
Reaction Score
7,437
Last year was a start, in fact, it was a far better start than most could have hoped for. Yes, regardless of intent, there was a half decade stretch where if the the goal had been to completely destroy the program they appeared to be succeeding but we should see steady improvement going forward and by the middle of year four in the Mora era (if not sooner) we will have quite a few ranking votes.

Well, hosting both NC St and Duke has to have some value and Utah St finished the year in the top 20 not long ago. USF is a decent program for the fourth best home opponent (for what we currently are, a basically insignificant independent) while FIU is acceptable (at the moment) as the fifth best (although the hope is that the day will arrive where a school like this will be the worst home opponent on the schedule). It may take time for the administration to eliminate an FCS opponent on the schedule each year but as this had been standard practice even when we were at our best, it is difficult to complain too much about Sacred Heart.

Hopefully you aren't one of the detractors who, after everything, will reply "but to make it worthwhile we'll need to schedule x amount of ranked teams at home.", followed by "yeah, but we should be able to bring in this big name or that big name regularly if we expect our fan base to be interested". I'm fully aware that there are some for who nothing will ever be good enough. Please don't be one of them.

I'll make a deal with you, pick a game, this year, next year, whenever, I'll provide the tickets and the tailgate (plenty of good food and drink). The only thing it will cost you is getting to and from the Rent and the time needed for the tailgate & game. If afterward you view it as worth the effort, you'll go to a stray game on your own dime and ask some friends to consider doing the same. If it doesn't end up being worth the effort in your eyes, you will have at least had some good food and drink for the time invested.

I attend almost all of the football games and would love to join your tailgate! You had me at "plenty of good food and drink."
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
12,297
Reaction Score
42,071
I attend almost all of the football games and would love to join your tailgate! You had me at "plenty of good food and drink."
When I figure out which flags I'll be flying I'll post it. Would love to have you stop by. Also extended earlier offers to a few other boneyarders, they are welcome as are any who I may have mistakenly overlooked.

In the middle of this upcoming week we'll be planning the logistics and menu. Next weekend will be testing all of the gear to ensure it's all in working order then after that it will be prep time for the food. One quick bit of info: it may be too early to break out the pizza oven so that won't debut for a few weeks.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2021
Messages
1,525
Reaction Score
7,122
Last year was a start, in fact, it was a far better start than most could have hoped for. Yes, regardless of intent, there was a half decade stretch where if the the goal had been to completely destroy the program they appeared to be succeeding but we should see steady improvement going forward and by the middle of year four in the Mora era (if not sooner) we will have quite a few ranking votes.

Well, hosting both NC St and Duke has to have some value and Utah St finished the year in the top 20 not long ago. USF is a decent program for the fourth best home opponent (for what we currently are, a basically insignificant independent) while FIU is acceptable (at the moment) as the fifth best (although the hope is that the day will arrive where a school like this will be the worst home opponent on the schedule). It may take time for the administration to eliminate an FCS opponent on the schedule each year but as this had been standard practice even when we were at our best, it is difficult to complain too much about Sacred Heart.

Hopefully you aren't one of the detractors who, after everything, will reply "but to make it worthwhile we'll need to schedule x amount of ranked teams at home.", followed by "yeah, but we should be able to bring in this big name or that big name regularly if we expect our fan base to be interested". I'm fully aware that there are some for who nothing will ever be good enough. Please don't be one of them.

I'll make a deal with you, pick a game, this year, next year, whenever, I'll provide the tickets and the tailgate (plenty of good food and drink). The only thing it will cost you is getting to and from the Rent and the time needed for the tailgate & game. If afterward you view it as worth the effort, you'll go to a stray game on your own dime and ask some friends to consider doing the same. If it doesn't end up being worth the effort in your eyes, you will have at least had some good food and drink for the time invested.
The point is quality opponents matter if we want to expand the base. I’m not talking about the great stuff happening on the field. A bottom dwelling MAC like schedule isn’t going to cut it, especially if we wish to be considered for a power conference. With CR and super conference scheduling , we are perilously close to being unable to schedule any P4 teams. The is a big picture issue.

Literally tomorrow we could have a few PAC teams on the slate. Id get home and away with Stanford, Cal, WSU and OSU on the schedule over the next 4 years. One west coast trip a year isn’t going to kill us. We could have one come in and we go out for the other filling 2 games a year.
 

Online statistics

Members online
498
Guests online
4,591
Total visitors
5,089

Forum statistics

Threads
157,042
Messages
4,078,518
Members
9,973
Latest member
WillngtnOak


Top Bottom