- Joined
- Jan 18, 2023
- Messages
- 207
- Reaction Score
- 932
Zags win. Good for us!Zags up on St Mary's by 14 w/3:30 to go... St Mary's the last undefeated in-conf team at 15-0
Zags win. Good for us!Zags up on St Mary's by 14 w/3:30 to go... St Mary's the last undefeated in-conf team at 15-0
New Mexico getting beat pretty good on the road. I love their talent, but they've just lost a ton of games. I don't know if they make it.
Show me where I said in these recent dicussions that we should judge selection for a team based on their NET. My talking points have been that 1) the ACC coaches don't understand the NET and 2) they are dumb because NET isn't as important as they think.So the NET is airtight when we are talking about the Big 12, but we should ignore it when we discuss the MWC?
Or maybe check the link in this post:Since we don't have much to care about as far as NCAA tournament selection or seeding for ourselves, I'm gonna do a weekly Big East Bubble Update. The most important metric for selection is the "Resume", which is the average of Strength of Record (SOR), KPI, and Wins Above Bubble (WAB). "Power" has more influence on seeding. Everything else varies committee by committee.
There is no evidence that the committee uses the NET to be precise. Check this post and see where a team's actual NET ranking lies:
Or here saying the committee looks beyond the numbers.Other metrics have things to mitigate situations like this (Haslam has analytically final, Torvik uses average lead throughout the game so the final margin isn't as important, etc.).
We don't know for sure if NET includes any of these mitigation strategies, but if it doesn't, the NCAA should incorporate something and spread that news so that coaches can literally rest easily. Either way, playing your starters to the end increases risk of injury and minutes load fatigue, so it's a consideration coaches need to make individually for a marginal increase in NET. Which again, is more important for your opponents than for yourself.
It's clear Capel has like a 20% understanding of the NET (people tell him there's margin of victory involved) and somehow even less understanding of the selection process. This seems like a problem if you're a D1 basketball coach.
This is literally what happens."I wish that was not the only thing that determined, wish there were some human beings that looked and watched and saw and really studied and picked who makes the tournament, not just going by computers and numbers and stuff. "
It's that troll Simon Baker on twitter (I have know idea if that's the troll name or not) who said Kolek was academically ineligible for the rest of the year. I think Chief and some of the other people who have been banned for me are creating threads about it. Of course the fatso Arby's Providence fan rolls with it for giggles.Someone said it once and everyone just ran with it. Just one of those random viral meme heckles. There's no basis of truth. I think it started because Marquette posted their guys with 3.5 GPAs and it was everyone on the team except Kolek.
Yeah, Ike getting into the flow has been huge. Over past six weeks (since 1/20), Zags have been #10 best team in country according to Torvik, one spot ahead of Creighton.Gonzaga looked like they were cooked midway through the season but they've recovered well
Yeah, they have quietly come on and are a near lock for the Tournament despite (as I expected) falling on their face after they lost to us. They were clear frauds as a top 10 team, but at least are Quad 1 and back in the top 25 and in the field.Gonzaga looked like they were cooked midway through the season but they've recovered well
Thats insane considering how bad they looked when we played them. Or did we just make them look bad?Yeah, Ike getting into the flow has been huge. Over past six weeks (since 1/20), Zags have been #10 best team in country according to Torvik, one spot ahead of Creighton.
They're a lock and they're not frauds, there's hardly anything separating them and a few of the top 10 teams.Yeah, they have quietly come on and are a near lock for the Tournament despite (as I expected) falling on their face after they lost to us. They were clear frauds as a top 10 team, but at least are Quad 1 and back in the top 25 and in the field.
No, not just us. They were actually pretty bad for several weeks after playing us and have since gotten their stuff together.Thats insane considering how bad they looked when we played them. Or did we just make them look bad?
Had no idea Andy Kennedy was a HC somewhere until today, the swing in the UAB/Memphis game was ridiculous, I thought for sure Memphis was gonna roll over and accept the L