took me a minute...No- it just means 605>305
I count seven games in which the lower seed has defeated the higher seed. And that is 7 out of 28 games completed. Are those upsets? Or is this a case of sloppy seeding by the NCAA?
since 8/9 and 7/10 are somewhat evenly matched, I was referring to a more significant upset
But there was a 12 that beat a 5, and if you take out the 1 and 2 seeds who are matched against the weakest teams in the field, that represents a high percentage of upsets. Or did they botch the seeds?
I now count 8 upsets in 32 games. And if one takes out the #1 and #2 seed games (8 games in all) because they are so obviously mismatches, then it means that there were 8 upsets out of 24 games. One out of three? That means that "upsets" are almost the rule. Can't we suggest that they weren't upsets, but screw-ups in seeding? Is this percentage of upsets the norm?
Of course - by definitionWas Louisville over Baylor in 2013 a screwup in seeding?
#12 South Dakota St 74
#5 Miami 71
I guess this means the ACC is overrated?
Good one.I guess the Canes will be hopping mad throughout the off season.