shizzle787
King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2015
- Messages
- 12,132
- Reaction Score
- 19,014
Not necessarily.We still get to keep our games with them...I guess?
Not necessarily.We still get to keep our games with them...I guess?
UMess men’s lax to apply to remain with A10 as affiliate member.… obviously hockey stays in Hockey East
MAC makes sense competition wise. but the schedule is so unattractive, it doesn’t make sense from a marketing standpoint.Absolutely not.
If Delaware had gone to the MAC as well, it would be a maybe but with just UMass and Buffalo it is definitely not enticing. We are lucky to be in a spot where we are not desperate to get into a fb conference and can wait out to 2026+ to see what happens with the ACC and the CFP. For now our best move is to stay calm and work the back channels.MAC makes sense competition wise. but the schedule is so unattractive, it doesn’t make sense from a marketing standpoint.
That isn’t what UConn aspires to be.
Best case scenario I could see our football temporarily parking in the MAC.Would a UConn FB only move to the MAC be the right decision if there's an opportunity? I can't imagine scheduling will be easy as an independent
There is nothing about UMass and UConn at Gillette that will drive anything. Nothing.An annual “U” game between New England’s two premier football teams at Gillette Stadium might make it worthwhile for us to join the MAC as well. Football drives the bus, not basketball. A pathway to the playoffs is what we need.
1) We can and most likely will continue to play UMass in football without joining the MACAn annual “U” game between New England’s two premier football teams at Gillette Stadium might make it worthwhile for us to join the MAC as well. Football drives the bus, not basketball. A pathway to the playoffs is what we need.
We could strike up a move with the B12 soonerIf Delaware had gone to the MAC as well, it would be a maybe but with just UMass and Buffalo it is definitely not enticing. We are lucky to be in a spot where we are not desperate to get into a fb conference and can wait out to 2026+ to see what happens with the ACC and the CFP. For now our best move is to stay calm and work the back channels.
The support from alum at UMass was less than 50%. UMass is very much like UConn in that basketball drives the bus there and more recently hockey. No one cares about football in Amherst - they play in a football stadium that is as "big" as the XL Center and it is NEVER filled up. The MAC is a horrendous hoops conference where the 1 bid team will get a 13 seed in the NCAAT. There will be no huge recruiting classes to that conference. UMass' attendance will crater to the extent there ever were fans at games in either sport.UMass has been in the A-10 for over 40 years! Back when UMass was good, this was the basketball line-up:
UMass, Dayton, Duquesne, Fordham, GW, La Salle, St. Joes, St. Bonnies, URI
Temple, Virginia Tech, Xavier - gone
UMass is clearly making a bold move here. There is no way UMass makes this move without support of fans, alumni and boosters, many of whom were most likely driving the change. It's a conference of all large public universities while UMass would be second in size behind Buffalo. And it's more regional than any other conference.
Granted the MAC is not a good basketball conference but let's put down grandpa's cough syrup making comparisons to other crappy basketball conferences like America East, which only has 9 programs lead by UVM. After the top 10 they all stink. UMass will jump in as one of the top programs and lift the profile of the conference. It has a few programs who win regularly. Win the conference and go to the dance. May even help the Buffalos of the conference with recruiting and a rivalry.
Football had 5 MAC programs on the 2024 schedule already. Now it will play for new rivalries and a conference championship. It's a great conference to kick-start the program and start elevating it from the bottom 10 of FBS.
More facts I suppose? Maybe look at the fact that UMass has sucked at the FBS level and is doing what it needs to do to improve, or are you entirely against change? It made the jump to FBS, so its only option is to try to improve and then the fans will turn out. That's the way it works, always has. I'm sure the alumni who know anything about football support this move. It doesn't affect hockey at all so no harm there.The support from alum at UMass was less than 50%. UMass is very much like UConn in that basketball drives the bus there and more recently hockey. No one cares about football in Amherst - they play in a football stadium that is as "big" as the XL Center and it is NEVER filled up. The MAC is a horrendous hoops conference where the 1 bid team will get a 13 seed in the NCAAT. There will be no huge recruiting classes to that conference. UMass' attendance will crater to the extent there ever were fans at games in either sport.
Yup more facts. No one will care in western Mass about the MAC. Just saw that the MAC is likely to add North Dakota State and Western Kentucky too. Football will be in better shape but fans still wont care and they wont be coming close to selling out a tiny football stadium. And basketball is toast which has always been the most popular sport at the school. The alumni who support football there will support the move but there just arent that many of them.More facts I suppose? Maybe look at the fact that UMass has sucked at the FBS level and is doing what it needs to do to improve, or are you entirely against change? It made the jump to FBS, so its only option is to try to improve and then the fans will turn out. That's the way it works, always has. I'm sure the alumni who know anything about football support this move. It doesn't affect hockey at all so no harm there.
Yeah those extra NCAA spots will definitely go to the MAC and not the power conferences.The NCAA tournament is likely going to have a dramatic expansion in the near future. In which case, the MAC will no longer be a one-bid conference.
Yeah those extra NCAA spots will definitely go to the MAC and not the power conferences.
Um. Boston College is light years better than UMass and us, 2 seasons ago notwithstanding... UMass can play Maine each year. I'd rather face BC though I find them to be a boring team akin to a Syracuse. Pretty vanilla teams anyway you slice it.An annual “U” game between New England’s two premier football teams at Gillette Stadium might make it worthwhile for us to join the MAC as well. Football drives the bus, not basketball. A pathway to the playoffs is what we need.