The View From Section 241 — Central | The Boneyard

The View From Section 241 — Central

Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
23,192
Reaction Score
13,236
Well, as opening days go that was pretty damn solid. Just a perfect weather day for the end of August, a solid tailgate (burgers, kielbasa and only CT beers), and the largest crowed we’e seen since the end of the Coach P era. That’s what UConn has reported, but frankly from the eye test I would agree with that. Were there more than 3k empty seats. Absolutely. But the stadium was as close to full as it has been for over a decade. And the student section was outstanding. Now, the question for the fan base is can we maintain that attendance? So far in the Mora era, attendance has greatly reduced as the season wore on, regardless of how well the season is going or the quality of the opponent. Coming off last year, even with the relatively low quality of the home schedule can we sustain the attendance? That may be as important to the program’s long range future as a few more wins will be. We’ll see. And, obviously, the game went fine.

As for what we learned from the game, the short answer is not much so this 241 will be (relatively) short and sweet. We learned that we were bigger, stronger and faster than Central (in a way that wasn’t true before Mora got there) so that the game really didn’t depend as much on schemes and even execution. On offense especially, much of what we saw was just easy — various skill players busting off long plays without even being challenged by the D. The offensive stats if you look at them — individually and as a team — are so great that I don’t even think we learned anything from them. But the OL was behind all of it, we showed not only skill but depth at the skill positions, and a special shout out to Victor Rosa. He is clearly part of the first team offensive unit, but was used mostly as a flanker/slot back in 4 WR formations. Having said that, when they handed him the ball twice he did everything in his power to show that he wanted to share carries with Edwards and Brown. Fagnano wasn’t perfect, but when you look at the numbers it’s hard to talk about what else he could have done better. Evers looked far more comfortable in his role than we ever saw him last year. Overall, again, I don’t think we learned anything much about the offense, but you couldn’t have hoped for it to look any better than it did. And I’m optimistic we can put up points at the Dome on Saturday.

Defense, while the numbers were solid (remember that the D only gave up 6 points, you can’t put the opening 7 on it) it just didn’t feel like the quality of performance that we would have hoped for. In fairness, some of that may have been to Central’s schemes and execution, but it just seemed o.k. We didn’t give up a lot of yards or points, but we didn’t force a single turnover, didn’t generate much of a pass rush (and we couldn’t get near the QB without a late hit anyways) and didn’t have a large number of three and outs. Nor, from my blind eyes can I single out any one player who I thought was dominant. I was largely focused on Ty King on D, but didnt’ see anything that reminded me of Tui and McDonald. But, as I said, I’m not beating on the D either. They did more than they had to do, and to some degree I feel like I’m punishing them for just quietly doing their job.

On specials, while the opening long snap shouldn’t have happened in Pop Warner (that as high over a punter’s head as I think I’ve ever seen), both the return games and the punting and kicking looked solid. Harper was the wild card there, and when the punter finally reached him he was ready. We didn’t give up enough returns to judge.

So next week, looking at preseason predictions, is our toughest challenge. Last year, we scored on them but couldn’t come near stopping them. Now, I’d be shocked if they get the quality of QB play they had last year, but we’ll see if our D can do any better. I think we can score on them, and can keep the ball out of their offense’s hands, but don’t have a clue if we’ll generate stops. But we’ll see. A win means this season has a chance to be spectacular. A loss doesn’t mean much in terms of still being able to improve on last year’s performance so long as we bounce back on the road the folllowing week.

One last note. For the first time since the Rent opened, it didn’t look like the school was supplying attendees with handouts with rosters. Really? Cheaping out is not going to drive attendance up. Sigh. Luckily, on a hunch, I had printed out the roster and two deep from the media guide so it didn’t bother me but still.
 
Well, as opening days go that was pretty damn solid. Just a perfect weather day for the end of August, a solid tailgate (burgers, kielbasa and only CT beers), and the largest crowed we’e seen since the end of the Coach P era. That’s what UConn has reported, but frankly from the eye test I would agree with that. Were there more than 3k empty seats. Absolutely. But the stadium was as close to full as it has been for over a decade. And the student section was outstanding. Now, the question for the fan base is can we maintain that attendance? So far in the Mora era, attendance has greatly reduced as the season wore on, regardless of how well the season is going or the quality of the opponent. Coming off last year, even with the relatively low quality of the home schedule can we sustain the attendance? That may be as important to the program’s long range future as a few more wins will be. We’ll see. And, obviously, the game went fine.

As for what we learned from the game, the short answer is not much so this 241 will be (relatively) short and sweet. We learned that we were bigger, stronger and faster than Central (in a way that wasn’t true before Mora got there) so that the game really didn’t depend as much on schemes and even execution. On offense especially, much of what we saw was just easy — various skill players busting off long plays without even being challenged by the D. The offensive stats if you look at them — individually and as a team — are so great that I don’t even think we learned anything from them. But the OL was behind all of it, we showed not only skill but depth at the skill positions, and a special shout out to Victor Rosa. He is clearly part of the first team offensive unit, but was used mostly as a flanker/slot back in 4 WR formations. Having said that, when they handed him the ball twice he did everything in his power to show that he wanted to share carries with Edwards and Brown. Fagnano wasn’t perfect, but when you look at the numbers it’s hard to talk about what else he could have done better. Evers looked far more comfortable in his role than we ever saw him last year. Overall, again, I don’t think we learned anything much about the offense, but you couldn’t have hoped for it to look any better than it did. And I’m optimistic we can put up points at the Dome on Saturday.

Defense, while the numbers were solid (remember that the D only gave up 6 points, you can’t put the opening 7 on it) it just didn’t feel like the quality of performance that we would have hoped for. In fairness, some of that may have been to Central’s schemes and execution, but it just seemed o.k. We didn’t give up a lot of yards or points, but we didn’t force a single turnover, didn’t generate much of a pass rush (and we couldn’t get near the QB without a late hit anyways) and didn’t have a large number of three and outs. Nor, from my blind eyes can I single out any one player who I thought was dominant. I was largely focused on Ty King on D, but didnt’ see anything that reminded me of Tui and McDonald. But, as I said, I’m not beating on the D either. They did more than they had to do, and to some degree I feel like I’m punishing them for just quietly doing their job.

On specials, while the opening long snap shouldn’t have happened in Pop Warner (that as high over a punter’s head as I think I’ve ever seen), both the return games and the punting and kicking looked solid. Harper was the wild card there, and when the punter finally reached him he was ready. We didn’t give up enough returns to judge.

So next week, looking at preseason predictions, is our toughest challenge. Last year, we scored on them but couldn’t come near stopping them. Now, I’d be shocked if they get the quality of QB play they had last year, but we’ll see if our D can do any better. I think we can score on them, and can keep the ball out of their offense’s hands, but don’t have a clue if we’ll generate stops. But we’ll see. A win means this season has a chance to be spectacular. A loss doesn’t mean much in terms of still being able to improve on last year’s performance so long as we bounce back on the road the folllowing week.

One last note. For the first time since the Rent opened, it didn’t look like the school was supplying attendees with handouts with rosters. Really? Cheaping out is not going to drive attendance up. Sigh. Luckily, on a hunch, I had printed out the roster and two deep from the media guide so it didn’t bother me but still.
My son picked up a program at halftime, they may have been put out late.
 
Cheaping out? They prob gave away 25,000 tickets for free. God forbid the casual fan doesn't have access to the 3rd string safety.

Long gone it seems are the days of needing heroics to beat the likes of Wagner, which is great.

Fagnano is the best QB we've had in a long time but he made a few horrible throws that should have been turnovers. Evers looked a lot better in limited action.

Defense is going to give up a lot of points - definitely worse off than last year - but perhaps a full season of Fagnano can help offset that.
 
Well, as opening days go that was pretty damn solid. Just a perfect weather day for the end of August, a solid tailgate (burgers, kielbasa and only CT beers), and the largest crowed we’e seen since the end of the Coach P era. That’s what UConn has reported, but frankly from the eye test I would agree with that. Were there more than 3k empty seats. Absolutely. But the stadium was as close to full as it has been for over a decade. And the student section was outstanding. Now, the question for the fan base is can we maintain that attendance? So far in the Mora era, attendance has greatly reduced as the season wore on, regardless of how well the season is going or the quality of the opponent. Coming off last year, even with the relatively low quality of the home schedule can we sustain the attendance? That may be as important to the program’s long range future as a few more wins will be. We’ll see. And, obviously, the game went fine.

As for what we learned from the game, the short answer is not much so this 241 will be (relatively) short and sweet. We learned that we were bigger, stronger and faster than Central (in a way that wasn’t true before Mora got there) so that the game really didn’t depend as much on schemes and even execution. On offense especially, much of what we saw was just easy — various skill players busting off long plays without even being challenged by the D. The offensive stats if you look at them — individually and as a team — are so great that I don’t even think we learned anything from them. But the OL was behind all of it, we showed not only skill but depth at the skill positions, and a special shout out to Victor Rosa. He is clearly part of the first team offensive unit, but was used mostly as a flanker/slot back in 4 WR formations. Having said that, when they handed him the ball twice he did everything in his power to show that he wanted to share carries with Edwards and Brown. Fagnano wasn’t perfect, but when you look at the numbers it’s hard to talk about what else he could have done better. Evers looked far more comfortable in his role than we ever saw him last year. Overall, again, I don’t think we learned anything much about the offense, but you couldn’t have hoped for it to look any better than it did. And I’m optimistic we can put up points at the Dome on Saturday.

Defense, while the numbers were solid (remember that the D only gave up 6 points, you can’t put the opening 7 on it) it just didn’t feel like the quality of performance that we would have hoped for. In fairness, some of that may have been to Central’s schemes and execution, but it just seemed o.k. We didn’t give up a lot of yards or points, but we didn’t force a single turnover, didn’t generate much of a pass rush (and we couldn’t get near the QB without a late hit anyways) and didn’t have a large number of three and outs. Nor, from my blind eyes can I single out any one player who I thought was dominant. I was largely focused on Ty King on D, but didnt’ see anything that reminded me of Tui and McDonald. But, as I said, I’m not beating on the D either. They did more than they had to do, and to some degree I feel like I’m punishing them for just quietly doing their job.

On specials, while the opening long snap shouldn’t have happened in Pop Warner (that as high over a punter’s head as I think I’ve ever seen), both the return games and the punting and kicking looked solid. Harper was the wild card there, and when the punter finally reached him he was ready. We didn’t give up enough returns to judge.

So next week, looking at preseason predictions, is our toughest challenge. Last year, we scored on them but couldn’t come near stopping them. Now, I’d be shocked if they get the quality of QB play they had last year, but we’ll see if our D can do any better. I think we can score on them, and can keep the ball out of their offense’s hands, but don’t have a clue if we’ll generate stops. But we’ll see. A win means this season has a chance to be spectacular. A loss doesn’t mean much in terms of still being able to improve on last year’s performance so long as we bounce back on the road the folllowing week.

One last note. For the first time since the Rent opened, it didn’t look like the school was supplying attendees with handouts with rosters. Really? Cheaping out is not going to drive attendance up. Sigh. Luckily, on a hunch, I had printed out the roster and two deep from the media guide so it didn’t bother me but still.
Good write-up! Lots of positives, my one major concern is our DL. Last year it was a barrier that the rest of the defense could flow around without blockers getting downfield much. We did not move Central around much and we did not get to the QB enough. Hence, the lack of turnovers mentioned in the opening post.
I like great size at DT and overall upfront, I don’t know the weights due to no programs being distributed but the eye test on our DL did not see imposing size or push.
Happy Victor made the most out of his two carries. He also made some great blocks on offense and special teams. He deserves more touches, although it is a deep position. Agree, his skill as a receiver should help him get minutes.
 
Our QB play looks to be improved. Joe looks comfortable running the team at both the fast and slow tempo. He is inconsistent but played a good game. Evers also looked as comfortable as I have seen him. He has great arm and made some nice throws into tight windows. Still waiting to see him use a little more touch or put air under the ball. McDonald made a great throw and a poor throw.

One thing that drove me crazy was the number of third and longs the defense gives up. On one drive Central converted three straight third and ten (or longer) to keep a drive going.

But except for the 5-yard TD drive they only gave up 6 points. So it's hard to complain.
 
Great job as always - very fair.

One player I thought stood out on D was Mills. He delivered some pop - some dawg. We'll see how the season goes, but might need to put Mills into the LB group from what little I saw today.

Another comment, overall OL play was pretty solid...and the OL in general had speed everywhere.
 
The defense had to be someone affected by losing their starting safety, Malachi McLean on the very first series.
 
O-line looked very good. QB, RBs, TEs, and WR all looked solid.

D-line needs some work. Not enough pressure on the QB and allowed holes for the RBs. LBs and D-backs played well. They looked fast and aggressive.

Kick-off and punt teams were solid except the missed snap, which I attribute to first game jitters.

Kick/punt return were solid.

PAT and field goal were OK except for the late game miss. Have to hit that.

Overall, I feel very confident about my prediction of an undefeated season.
 
They prob gave away 25,000 tickets for free.
I doubt this is accurate, but if it were, I would entirely agree with the concept. Empty seats, degrade the athlete experience, the fan experience, and the reputation of the school. I see very little point in not filling them anyway you can. That said, you have to respect your season, tickets holders who are the lifeblood of your program by giving them first shot at those tickets, plus a lot of other perks.
 
Yeah - got mine from the Sausage Guy.
Season 3 Nevermind GIF by The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air
 
I doubt this is accurate, but if it were, I would entirely agree with the concept. Empty seats, degrade the athlete experience, the fan experience, and the reputation of the school. I see very little point in not filling them anyway you can. That said, you have to respect your season, tickets holders who are the lifeblood of your program by giving them first shot at those tickets, plus a lot of other perks.

I made the 25k up but what do we really think? Upper teens? I have no issue and would be encouraging UConn to juice attendance numbers - they should have been for years.

The season ticket holders are the lifeblood and they do kind of get screwed. Unless you view the season tickets as essentially a donation to the program there's really not much incentive to buy cheap (or free) individual games.

Not sure what they've been doing "extra" for the Season ticket holders in recent years. I do think small gestures go a long way in this regards.
 
Going into the Syracuse game we are way better off having played Central than having had an opener like last year at Maryland then playing an FCS. Defense had a chance to find out how well they work together. Central had a good returning QB, RB and 2 preseason all conference O-lineman so they were not totally over matched. Those failures to get stops on 3rd and longs are aggravating. Jackson Harper had a great start to his role as punt returner and 2nd group wideout. He showed why he was prep league offensive player of the year. Fagnano had a good game and could have been better. And he will need to be this week. Sammis had the team working the hurry up in pregame warmups and its nice to see an OC really try and make us a problem on offense rather than the boring offense we were used too. Bell, Edwards and Brown are serious weapons. Big questions for this week. Is Skyler Bell good to go? Can Trent Jones II play? Lastly it was really a nice surprise to see the number of fans in the stands. Great way too start the season.
 
I think we knew that the defense was going to take time to jell due to the large number of newcomers playing on D. And, I don't think Brock showed everything we will do on D on Saturday, and I think we will see more against Syracuse. If you look at the sacks from last year, very few were from the DL with most coming from LBs or hybrid players: 25 total for the team: Brown 4.5, McDonald 3.5, Yates 3.5, Hardy 3.5, Jevon Banks 2.0, many guys with 1.
 
Good write-up! Lots of positives, my one major concern is our DL. Last year it was a barrier that the rest of the defense could flow around without blockers getting downfield much. We did not move Central around much and we did not get to the QB enough. Hence, the lack of turnovers mentioned in the opening post.
I like great size at DT and overall upfront, I don’t know the weights due to no programs being distributed but the eye test on our DL did not see imposing size or push.
Happy Victor made the most out of his two carries. He also made some great blocks on offense and special teams. He deserves more touches, although it is a deep position. Agree, his skill as a receiver should help him get minutes.
Definitely not Gourdine and Stafford up front. Hoping they gel next week.
 
I think we knew that the defense was going to take time to jell due to the large number of newcomers playing on D. And, I don't think Brock showed everything we will do on D on Saturday, and I think we will see more against Syracuse. If you look at the sacks from last year, very few were from the DL with most coming from LBs or hybrid players: 25 total for the team: Brown 4.5, McDonald 3.5, Yates 3.5, Hardy 3.5, Jevon Banks 2.0, many guys with 1.

In a 3-3-5 scheme the DL won't get many sacks. Their job is to tie up as many of the OL as possible to give blitzing LB amd DB at path to the QB.
 


I'm not the biggest fan ot it. If the 3-3-5 were a great scheme, better teams with better athletes would use it more often.
The 3-3-5 is designed.to maximize your best talent and use some big uglies to free up that talent.
That being said, Brock's version has worked. It is the prototypical bend but don't break. It gives up yards between the 20's and then gets tougher near the goal line.
 
I don't think everyone understands what Brock is doing. Many times, there is a 4th hybrid DE/LB on the field. And, he wants to bring pressure from all angles, especially inside, using the LBs and DBs. And, the DL holding up the blockers means the LBs will make lots of tackles.
I may be on crack, but I remember last year on key short to middle yardage plays we fell into a hybrid 3-4 almost and to your point brought pressure from the corners.

Helps when your MLBs are tackle monsters up the gut.
 

Online statistics

Members online
268
Guests online
2,342
Total visitors
2,610

Forum statistics

Threads
164,133
Messages
4,384,018
Members
10,185
Latest member
aacgoast


.
..
Top Bottom