YearoftheHusky
Name checks out.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,467
- Reaction Score
- 10,003
I have us as a five seed out West playing UAB.
What say you?
What say you?
NCAA likes rematches in S16, so west yes. CSUF?I have us as a five seed out West playing UAB.
What say you?
YesIf we're the #1 ranked 5 seed that means we will get a play in winner, right?
Not necessarily. Every year since 2015 the play in games have been 11 seeds. There's been 20 play in games in this format since 2011 (not counting the 16 seed matchups) and 3 have been with 12 seedsIf we're the #1 ranked 5 seed that means we will get a play in winner, right?
Seems odd that the bracketologists keep using the 12 seed line as the play in games thenNot necessarily. Every year since 2015 the play in games have been 11 seeds. There's been 20 play in games in this format since 2011 (not counting the 16 seed matchups) and 3 have been with 12 seeds
I can see it but don't want Rutgers....still hoping we might sneak into a 4 seed.I could see them sticking us in the 5/12 game against the play-in team like a Rutgers (Steve Pikiell angle)
I hope not. In what world is north Texas better than Indiana ?If we're the #1 ranked 5 seed that means we will get a play in winner, right?
It looks like maybe there's been less bids stolen than in years past maybe so less AQs that are ranked lower than the bottom at large teams. Not too sure honestlySeems odd that the bracketologists keep using the 12 seed line as the play in games then
Do adults actually think these “digs” are funny?I see a brighter future than Suckacuse.
Don't forget Rutgers and Maryland. We got 2 chances to go B1G.I see us becoming the dominant university in the Northeast in all sports after rising ocean levels wipe out BC, Providence, Villanova, Georgetown and St. John's. With Miami also being consumed by the Atlantic Ocean, we finally get that long-awaited invite to the ACC.
That was my thought, Rutgers.I could see them sticking us in the 5/12 game against the play-in team like a Rutgers (Steve Pikiell angle)
They would absolutely not set up an intra-conference matchup in the 2nd round unless the BE has more than 8 teams in the field.5 against Rutgers in Buffalo/Philly. In a surprise, Providence is the 4 seed. Baylor as the 1.
We only played them once, so it's legal by their bracketing procedures starting as early as the round of 32. We're also not protected from being seeded against conference mate by being a 5 or worse seed (the first 4 top 4 seeds from each conference are scattered, but 5s can go anywhere).They would absolutely not set up an intra-conference matchup in the 2nd round unless the BE has more than 8 teams in the field.
But wouldn't that still mean no Providence? We wouldn't be protected as a 5 seed but they would as a 4 seed. Not sure how that works thoughWe only played them once, so it's legal by their bracketing procedures starting as early as the round of 32. We're also not protected from being seeded against conference mate by being a 5 or worse seed (the first 4 top 4 seeds from each conference are scattered, but 5s can go anywhere).