Ollie Suing Glen Miller for Slander | Page 24 | The Boneyard

Ollie Suing Glen Miller for Slander

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 31, 2017
Messages
339
Reaction Score
834
I was just making a joke about who KO might sue next given he's now battling on 2-3 fronts (vs UConn, vs NCAA, vs Miller). No other commentary intended.
But I'm on board with the method that UConn has chosen. I wish KO had accepted some money and went away, but per the vague contract he signed, he's not owed a dime. You appear to be on the other side of the fence from me. What's your take?
I disagree with the UCONN approach to firing K.O. It could have been done years earlier and they did not have to extend his contract in the first place. In most cases when a coach doesn't work out you agree to a buyout. UCONN didn't have the money to do this based on the remaining money left on K.O.'s deal. Ultimately UCONN when nuclear and so did K.O. so I do put burden on the University to avoid this situation all together and to clean it up. It was very foreseeable. We are where we are now and there are costs to be paid with decisions. I think the core disagreement on this board is around approach however I don't understand when folks on the board act like UCONN had absolutely no role to play in this situation and feel the burden still remains with the University to clean this up. Folks on the board character assassinate K.O. at the expense of letting the UCONN Administration completely off the hook for getting us in this situation.
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
13,500
Reaction Score
90,378
I disagree with the UCONN approach to firing K.O. It could have been done years earlier and they did not have to extend his contract in the first place. In most cases when a coach doesn't work out you agree to a buyout. UCONN didn't have the money to do this based on the remaining money left on K.O.'s deal. Ultimately UCONN when nuclear and so did K.O. so I do put burden on the University to avoid this situation all together and to clean it up. It was very foreseeable. We are where we are now and there are costs to be paid with decisions. I think the core disagreement on this board is around approach however I don't understand when folks on the board act like UCONN had absolutely no role to play in this situation and feel the burden still remains with the University to clean this up. Folks on the board character assassinate K.O. at the expense of letting the UCONN Administration completely off the hook for getting us in this situation.
They offered KO a buyout and he turned it down because he wanted more. Come on man, this isn't hard
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,456
Reaction Score
211,262
I disagree with the UCONN approach to firing K.O. It could have been done years earlier and they did not have to extend his contract in the first place. In most cases when a coach doesn't work out you agree to a buyout. UCONN didn't have the money to do this based on the remaining money left on K.O.'s deal. Ultimately UCONN when nuclear and so did K.O. so I do put burden on the University to avoid this situation all together and to clean it up. It was very foreseeable. We are where we are now and there are costs to be paid with decisions. I think the core disagreement on this board is around approach however I don't understand when folks on the board act like UCONN had absolutely no role to play in this situation and feel the burden still remains with the University to clean this up. Folks on the board character assassinate K.O. at the expense of letting the UCONN Administration completely off the hook for getting us in this situation.
UConn has @$385M in cash or cash equivalents, so it certainly had the ability to pay Kevin. It didn't because Kevin had breached his contract by cheating and by lying about it to his employers which triggers a termination of his contract. If KO hadn't cheated or hadn't lied about it, he would likely have been terminated and paid the remainder of his contract. Paying someone millions who had no lawful claim to that money would at best be malfeasance and might be well criminal. There is one person who is responsible for the chain of events that led to Kevin's discharge for cause. That is Kevin.
 
Last edited:

Rico444

In the mix for six
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,717
Reaction Score
30,356
I disagree with the UCONN approach to firing K.O. It could have been done years earlier and they did not have to extend his contract in the first place. In most cases when a coach doesn't work out you agree to a buyout. UCONN didn't have the money to do this based on the remaining money left on K.O.'s deal. Ultimately UCONN when nuclear and so did K.O. so I do put burden on the University to avoid this situation all together and to clean it up. It was very foreseeable. We are where we are now and there are costs to be paid with decisions. I think the core disagreement on this board is around approach however I don't understand when folks on the board act like UCONN had absolutely no role to play in this situation and feel the burden still remains with the University to clean this up. Folks on the board character assassinate K.O. at the expense of letting the UCONN Administration completely off the hook for getting us in this situation.

Ollie could've been fired YEARS earlier than he was?! Two years before he was fired he made the 2nd round of the NCAAs, and two years prior to that he won a national championship. When exactly would you have fired him?
 

polycom

I heard a beep, who just joined?
Joined
Nov 14, 2014
Messages
7,687
Reaction Score
14,516
I don't personally know K.O. but certainly if you reflect on those seasons you could see that something was off with the team's chemistry and no one could put there finger on what it was. Dis-function like this bleeds into recruiting, the team, the staff; it bleeds into everything. I guarantee you that this wasn't done for an invalid reason. I'm sure this undermining was also indirectly tied to the fractured relationship he had with Jim Calhoun prior to the GM firing. It's all related and it would have been great of Jim Calhoun was able to fix this. However typically what happens is when things don't play out the way you hoped you start to look deeper at potential causes and I'm sure K.O. found out that he had a cancer on his staff as it related to where he was trying to take the program. It's clear that GM did not buy into what K.O. was doing and had an issue with it. I'm sure this even went back to when K.O. was selected over him by Jim Calhoun. The bottom line is when the trust is gone you have to go in a different direction. It's clear that is what happened here.

How can you speculate all of these things if you do not know either party involved.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
49,040
Reaction Score
169,112
I don't personally know K.O. but certainly if you reflect on those seasons you could see that something was off with the team's chemistry and no one could put there finger on what it was. Dis-function like this bleeds into recruiting, the team, the staff; it bleeds into everything. I guarantee you that this wasn't done for an invalid reason. I'm sure this undermining was also indirectly tied to the fractured relationship he had with Jim Calhoun prior to the GM firing. It's all related and it would have been great of Jim Calhoun was able to fix this. However typically what happens is when things don't play out the way you hoped you start to look deeper at potential causes and I'm sure K.O. found out that he had a cancer on his staff as it related to where he was trying to take the program. It's clear that GM did not buy into what K.O. was doing and had an issue with it. I'm sure this even went back to when K.O. was selected over him by Jim Calhoun. The bottom line is when the trust is gone you have to go in a different direction. It's clear that is what happened here.
Sorry but your last couple of posts reveal you have no clue about any of the inner working of UConn basketball. The idea that Glen Miller thought Calhoun would name him his successor is so far from reality it's laughable. You are putting all this dysfunction on Glen Miller and every other place besides Ollie. The idea that three of our future starters and our top recruit left because of Glen Miller is batstuff crazy and the relationship between KO and Calhoun soured because after KO won it all he had no use for Calhoun anymore.
 

UConnNick

from Vince Lombardi's home town
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
5,076
Reaction Score
14,074
How can you speculate all of these things if you do not know either party involved.

The same poster also claimed in one of his earlier posts that Ollie is "fighting to save his marriage and to repair his damaged relationship with Calhoun", all without the benefit of knowing Ollie personally. Lots of unsubstantiated suppositions here.

As far as the law is concerned, the marriage is over. Also, the relationship with Calhoun is over, and sadly for Ollie, his collegiate coaching career is likely over.
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2018
Messages
2,167
Reaction Score
6,847
Sorry but your last couple of posts reveal you have no clue about any of the inner working of UConn basketball. The idea that Glen Miller thought Calhoun would name him his successor is so far from reality it's laughable. You are putting all this dysfunction on Glen Miller and every other place besides Ollie. The idea that three of our future starters and our top recruit left because of Glen Miller is batstuff crazy and the relationship between KO and Calhoun soured because after KO won it all he had no use for Calhoun anymore.
Actually I think they did leave because of GM....GM getting fired.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,993
Reaction Score
5,935
What is the basis of the claim? Describe the complaint. Kevin Ollie seeks damages because....? Because the NCAA relied on evidence from a guy who may have said something else that they didn’t rely upon, which was untrue? That’s not a tort as far as I know. Oh and they relied upon other information that didn’t come from Miller at all. Most of which we know to be true. And Ollie’s damages, such as they are, come from being fired, which again was based on violations that did happen and which are corroborated by more than Miller.

It’s silly to even suggest that he could sue the NCAA for investigating things they are supposed to investigate and issuing findings as to who it thinks violated rules it wrote. Unless you or he thinks that the NCAA itself made all this up, and fabricated everything with the intent to cause harm to KO. Is that the claim?

Seems like Tark the Shark sued the NCAA for: "things" they are supposed to investigate and issuing findings as to who it thinks violated rules it wrote; and it turned out ok for him. The NCAA is run by a clown and to think for some reason he doesn't surround himself with clowns would be a mistake. At the 1st sign of someone coming at them with guns blazing and nothing to lose the NCAA will fold. Ollie isn't UConn who has already seen what happens when the powers that be in the NCAA have it "in" for you; sure would like to see Ollie disposing NCAA characters on all the "dialogue" they had with various people related to Ollie and UConn related to these potential infractions. When did UConn discuss potential violations with the NCAA vs. with Ollie, when did UConn 1st discuss firing Ollie for cause and what type of discussions were had with Ollie before the firing discussion.

A "nothing to lose" Ollie with a legal team that's willing to take it to the max is not a group I'd want to fight with if I were the NCAA or UConn.
 

UConnNick

from Vince Lombardi's home town
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
5,076
Reaction Score
14,074
Seems like Tark the Shark sued the NCAA for: "things" they are supposed to investigate and issuing findings as to who it thinks violated rules it wrote; and it turned out ok for him. The NCAA is run by a clown and to think for some reason he doesn't surround himself with clowns would be a mistake. At the 1st sign of someone coming at them with guns blazing and nothing to lose the NCAA will fold. Ollie isn't UConn who has already seen what happens when the powers that be in the NCAA have it "in" for you; sure would like to see Ollie disposing NCAA characters on all the "dialogue" they had with various people related to Ollie and UConn related to these potential infractions. When did UConn discuss potential violations with the NCAA vs. with Ollie, when did UConn 1st discuss firing Ollie for cause and what type of discussions were had with Ollie before the firing discussion.

A "nothing to lose" Ollie with a legal team that's willing to take it to the max is not a group I'd want to fight with if I were the NCAA or UConn.

LOL...so far Ollie's legal representation has been a total clown show. I seriously doubt that either UCONN or the NCAA are quaking in their boots at anything the Ollie legal team attempts to do. Their track record to this point is an embarrassingly epic fail on all fronts. They are going to lose at arbitration and in the courts, assuming they bother with any more of it after getting poured out at arbitration.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
345
Guests online
2,318
Total visitors
2,663

Forum statistics

Threads
157,473
Messages
4,104,106
Members
9,993
Latest member
Newbie32


Top Bottom