I'm of two minds:
On the one hand, given that the Tennessee AD was reported to have a pretty limited budget, I think she ticks all the necessary boxes: former Summitt player, ties to the program, female, solid coaching experience.
On the other hand, I was not impressed with her on-court coaching versus Stanford in the Sweet Sixteen, and I was surprised how much it seemed like her husband was taking the lead in making in-game decisions. During the game, before I knew he was her husband, there were one or two times the camera panned to the Miz St. bench and I was thinking, "who's this guy, and why is he in charge?"
I am probably biased because I mostly follow the most experienced, most basketball-literate coaches (Geno, Tara, MM, Mulkey, Rueck, Walz, etc.), and it's an admittedly limited sample size, but I have not been impressed by her in the several interviews I've watched. Her comments all seem kind of superficial and not very revealing in terms of X's and O's. I also can't help but shake how weird it is that her husband is her assistant coach. Doesn't that create bad conflicts of interest? Wouldn't that inherently create odd dynamics among the assistant coaches and players? Can't she find someone in the whole wide world other than her husband to be her assistant?
I'll say this: I could be wrong, but I don't think either Huskies or Cardinal fans should be worried that UT is about to nudge their way back into the running for national championships. But hey, what do I know, I'm just a fan.