- Joined
- Apr 1, 2013
- Messages
- 6,941
- Reaction Score
- 17,423
The truth is sarals is correct. There are only five nationally relevant women's programs, year in and year out. Parity is still a pipe dream in the women's game. Nos. 1 through 5 almost never lose games to Nos. 6 through 25, and Top 25 teams almost never lose to anybody else. You can pick five teams before the start of any season and one of those five is going to win the national championship.
Who said anything about parity thread had nothing to do with parity.
The point si sarls seems ot care about Princeton.
I care about the perception of the AAC. So when some ESPN dude speaks of Pitt and CUse as if they are relevant it was at least important to me.
Yet as you and sarals say if only 5 teams matter then why should Princeton matter? Or is it -- to sarals and others --only their concerns matter?
Pitt and Cuse are not as good as USF. Belittling our conference to make these teams seem as if they would be - should be called out.