- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 817
- Reaction Score
- 1,144
Thank you more fuel to our fire we played 1 bad game all year we have under rated star type players with good role players who play good D
The perception is that Michigan State is a team without any apparent weaknesses while UConn has a weak frontcourt. I'm not saying we have a dominant frontcourt but we are leaps and bounds stronger than we were in November. We are now holding our own on the boards and our overall defense is a lot better. Our biggest weakness is Brimah getting beat off the dribble from the perimeter but there is only so much damage a 5 can do driving to the rim. We have a big edge on the perimeter so it is close to being a wash.
If we played Michigan State 10 times they would have a major advantage but we are playing them 1 game in our backyard. I like our chances.
No one ever gives us a chance. We are an ELITE program but always considered the underdog. But that's what makes us, us. That's our pedigree. That's what keeps us fighting. And that's why I bleed blue and love being an alum and fan of this university. I'd have it no other way.
That's not true. MSU is a better team than UConn, I think they would win 7 or 8 out of 10 games, but maybe we play well and they don't.
If we go small I like a lineup of SN, RB, NG, DD and some rotation of LK, TS and even a spark of OC to see if he has any legs.
Thank you more fuel to our fire we played 1 bad game all year we have under rated star type players with good role players who play good D
Any time you have a player like your PG who can get his own shot and create for others, you've got a legitimate chance. The analysts just don't like the matchup, IMO -- UCONN likes to run and UCONN gives up offensive rebounds, both of which play into MSU's game.
We just need a strong game from the Giff with 10+ boards againI wouldn't necessarily say UCONN likes to run. They are happy to slow it down, as they did against ISU. That's the advantage of having two great point guards.
That said, giving up O rebounds is an issue that they'll somehow have to contend with against a very strong MSU interior.
Given Appling's wrist situation, I like UCONN's guards vs MSU's. MSU's size and strength is much better than UCONN's. I think MSU probably has more matchup advantages. It will be interesting to see how it turns out.
I wouldn't necessarily say UCONN likes to run. They are happy to slow it down, as they did against ISU. That's the advantage of having two great point guards.
That said, giving up O rebounds is an issue that they'll somehow have to contend with against a very strong MSU interior.
Given Appling's wrist situation, I like UCONN's guards vs MSU's. MSU's size and strength is much better than UCONN's. I think MSU probably has more matchup advantages. It will be interesting to see how it turns out.
Appling has sucked for weeks and is pretty much worthless, aside from still being a great defender. MSU was pretty much unbeatable with him playing at a high level, but that time has come and gone. I'd definitely give the edge to UCONN's guard play, though MSU has the advantage of having size on the perimeter, which may make it more difficult for your guards to get clean looks.
Sparty lifts bro.A school who's mascot is a guy who carries a fake sword and wears a skirt does not scare me,.
unless it is a hairdressing competition.
Villanova and Iowa State also had a size advantage on the perimeter and they aren't playing anymore.Appling has sucked for weeks and is pretty much worthless, aside from still being a great defender. MSU was pretty much unbeatable with him playing at a high level, but that time has come and gone. I'd definitely give the edge to UCONN's guard play, though MSU has the advantage of having size on the perimeter, which may make it more difficult for your guards to get clean looks.
Villanova and Iowa State also had a size advantage on the perimeter and they aren't playing anymore.
Isu got a lot more O boards. However, they missed a lot more shots.I wouldn't necessarily say UCONN likes to run. They are happy to slow it down, as they did against ISU. That's the advantage of having two great point guards.
That said, giving up O rebounds is an issue that they'll somehow have to contend with against a very strong MSU interior.
Given Appling's wrist situation, I like UCONN's guards vs MSU's. MSU's size and strength is much better than UCONN's. I think MSU probably has more matchup advantages. It will be interesting to see how it turns out.