NBA draft production since '87 | The Boneyard

NBA draft production since '87

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
661
Reaction Score
1,879
ESPN rates lottery and first round picks higher than second round picks.

http://Post original url/1svTMq6

1. duke
2.unc
3.kentucky
4 kansas
5. Arizona
6. ucla
7. uconn
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,353
Reaction Score
46,686
Didn't ESPN do this extensive list last year also weighing impact?

And they determined that UConn was 3rd after North Carolina and Georgetown.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
16,529
Reaction Score
32,074
I wonder, do recruits keep up with this stuff or just us adult fans?

I would think that a talented recruit can get to the NBA with any of the top 25 programs in the country. The advantage of course is if you leave better than you came in (i.e. NBA ready). I think that is what Ollie will be able to sell in a few years.
 

UconnU

If he blocks 100, he blocks 100
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,756
Reaction Score
31,490
Now factor in development... Most of those schools ahead of us are recruiting only top 30 kids. We're bringing in 3-4 star kids and getting them into the league. We didn't even have a high school all American on this last championship team those teams are bringing in atleast 1 AA each year.
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
14,657
Reaction Score
81,413
Didn't ESPN do this extensive list last year also weighing impact?

And they determined that UConn was 3rd after North Carolina and Georgetown.

Yes, see link below.

http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/tag/_/name/path-to-the-draft-2013

I think this analysis was better because it took into account what the players did in the NBA after they were drafted. In the SB Nation article in the original post Duke would get more credit for Cherokee Parks being a lottery pick than UConn would for Cliff Robinson having a solid 17 year career. Cliffy made a lot more money in the NBA than Parks did. Isn't that ultimately what recruits want rather than just getting drafted? UConn players in general have been more prepared for the NBA than Duke players even though Duke has had more players drafted.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
16,529
Reaction Score
32,074
Yes, see link below.

http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/tag/_/name/path-to-the-draft-2013

I think this analysis was better because it took into account what the players did in the NBA after they were drafted. In the SB Nation article in the original post Duke would get more credit for Cherokee Parks being a lottery pick than UConn would for Cliff Robinson having a solid 17 year career. Cliffy made a lot more money in the NBA than Parks did. Isn't that ultimately what recruits want rather than just getting drafted? UConn players in general have been more prepared for the NBA than Duke players even though Duke has had more players drafted.
What I find interesting in that link is that UConn will have the only HOF player amoung the top schools (except Georgetown with Ewing and Iverson). I don't see anyone from duke, uk or unc making the HOF.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,051
Reaction Score
19,075
Kitaman said:
What I find interesting in that link is that UConn will have the only HOF player amoung the top schools (except Georgetown with Ewing and Iverson). I don't see anyone from duke, uk or unc making the HOF.

Vince Carter has a good chance. Has big career numbers from longevity and was a dominant player at his peak.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,353
Reaction Score
46,686
Vince Carter has a good chance. Has big career numbers from longevity and was a dominant player at his peak.

Man, if Carter makes the HOF, I'll shake my head.

I'd take several non HOF ahead of him, like Buck Williams, maybe Jack Sikma, or Dikembe Mutombo, Detlef Schempf, Sidney Moncrief or Chris Webber. of those, definitely Williams and a ? on all the others including Carter.
 

Matrim55

Why is it so hard To make it in America
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Messages
6,051
Reaction Score
55,711

Mazhude

"Bark, Bark!"
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
806
Reaction Score
3,442
Vince Carter has a good chance. Has big career numbers from longevity and was a dominant player at his peak.
As the article notes: "Good as he was, Carter never led a team past the second round of the playoffs. Good as he was, in 2005 he blatantly tanked his way out of Toronto at the first hint of dissatisfaction, and then later, with the New Jersey Nets, openly admitted it. (Toronto fans rightfully revile Carter, which, seeing as he played a not-insignificant role in building that city's now-thriving basketball culture in the first place, is doubly sad.) Good as he was, Carter never played defense. Good as he was, Carter flopped and flailed like every bit of contact was a mortal wound, and zestily played up every minor injury. Good as he was -- and seriously, you guys, the dude was good -- Carter could have lurched toward this fall, in what will be his 15th NBA season, as a diminished but revered legend. Instead, he's practically a cautionary tale. Good as he was, he never seemed to care..."
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,051
Reaction Score
19,075
He's certainly no guarantee - but he's in the Alex English and Adrian Dantley mold of guys who put up big numbers in their careers without winning titles. Carter is 25th all time in scoring and was a 28 ppg guy at his peak. He may not get in, but when the voting comes around, he's going to have some numbers to help his case.

He was also the USA's leading scorer on a gold medal winning team in the Olympics in 2000.
 

Mazhude

"Bark, Bark!"
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
806
Reaction Score
3,442
I hear you. The dude put up some great numbers, and in later years, the stats can carry more weight than the grey beards recollection of every flop and foible... so it wouldn't surprise me if you are right.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,497
Reaction Score
14,642
Carter is definitely a HOF. Never really won nothing in the league but the guy was good enough. his first 10 years in the league he was about as good as anybody. I remember at one point there was an arguement on who would you take vince or kobe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
325
Guests online
2,510
Total visitors
2,835

Forum statistics

Threads
157,344
Messages
4,095,467
Members
9,985
Latest member
stanfordnyc


Top Bottom