Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 59 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
4,856
Reaction Score
19,621
Anyone leaving a non-P5 conference is "not major".

It sounds to me more like Jeff Long was asked a question about realignment and gave an answer to indicate that nothing is happening.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,326
Reaction Score
46,518
McMurphy just doesn't get it. There will be a whole lotta shaking going on.
 
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
4,856
Reaction Score
19,621
McMurphy just doesn't get it. There will be a whole lotta shaking going on.
He's quoting Jeff Long who apparently made the statement on Sirius radio. At least that's the way I read it.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
4,909
Reaction Score
18,466
When a #1 vs #2 matchup gets a .8 and it's celebrated, that's how little women's bball pushes the television needle.

0.8 is actually a phenomenal rating.That rating buries the Men's Big East ratings on FOX. If WBB could pull ratings anywhere near that for other encounters, every media company would clamor for the Huskies to be on. The mere presence of UConn on the B1G or ACC schedule would create a lot of buzz and fill their empty arenas. (Those down south that watched the game couldn't believe the spirit and size of the Gampel crowd) . Don't think that the B1G isn't cognizant of how the Huskie's Men's and Women's BBall could help their network. Once UConn Football gets going and the AAU is a reality, the future shaking up of CR noted by several pundits will come to pass. Now its all about winning at football and getting back the buzz and support necessary for us to have some realistic traction with the decision makers.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,512
Reaction Score
13,311
The charm for you the spectator are the amateur athletes competing. The best have different motives and typically want to keep their options open. We see it every April. Holding them in college for three years runs counter to keeping their options open. In general, the Ryan Boatrights of the world either have a physical flaw, (e.g. not tall enough), flaw in their game (e.g. need to consistently demonstrate leadership qualities) or are outliers.

Just one man's (possibly jaded) opinion.
Isn't the one and done a recent rule we survived nicely without it for a long time.
The way it's gamed now is a joke.
The players who can make the jump from high school are a rare few.
The dozen or so freshman who get drafted in the first or second round aren't really going to hurt college basketball.
Do you really think playing minor league ball in South Dakota is going to lure that many away from college. If that's what they want I'm okay with it. The minor league baseball model ,where they sign thousands of kids annually to get to a handful who actually make is a cold reminder of that route. Most are left with memories of long bus rides and Sor arms.
Hasn't college baseball played a much larger role in recent years even with limited scholarship availability and a non revenue status.
College ball will actually get better as kids stay longer.
The one and done rule does nothing for college ball except cause them to babysit non-students for a year. It's a disservice to the studend athlete ,but it's exploitive of these kids with total disregard to them having any value other than a Basketball Skill.
That rule should go , a mandatory three year commitment , will actually induce more kids to stay four. Inforcing that rule could be difficult.
 

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,523
Reaction Score
19,507
Isn't the one and done a recent rule we survived nicely without it for a long time.
The way it's gamed now is a joke.
The players who can make the jump from high school are a rare few.
The dozen or so freshman who get drafted in the first or second round aren't really going to hurt college basketball.
Do you really think playing minor league ball in South Dakota is going to lure that many away from college. If that's what they want I'm okay with it. The minor league baseball model ,where they sign thousands of kids annually to get to a handful who actually make is a cold reminder of that route. Most are left with memories of long bus rides and Sor arms.
Hasn't college baseball played a much larger role in recent years even with limited scholarship availability and a non revenue status.
College ball will actually get better as kids stay longer.
The one and done rule does nothing for college ball except cause them to babysit non-students for a year. It's a disservice to the studend athlete ,but it's exploitive of these kids with total disregard to them having any value other than a Basketball Skill.
That rule should go , a mandatory three year commitment , will actually induce more kids to stay four. Inforcing that rule could be difficult.

The One and Done rule is not an NCAA rule. It's an NBA rule so that for-profit teams aren't bearing the brunt of developing 18 year old kids who don't recognize that they aren't ready to bang around with men in their physical prime. A second benefit for the NBA is that it actually saves it's teams' GMs from themselves. There is no longer that need to draft the next Kobe Bryant, when all they have to go on is a grainy video of spin moves against a folding chair.

I had a longer post all chambered, but I scrapped it. I just found the following, which is not a terrible compromise.


The 2 year commitment would at least make kids maintain NCAA eligibility into their 2nd year (UK would be duckked by the APR :cool:), but not restrict their options too badly.
 

ConnHuskBask

Shut Em Down!
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
8,964
Reaction Score
32,839
Hate to be a message board hardo, but there's literally thousands of threads to have the same roundabout discussions we have every day on the Yard. Can we keep this to the key tweets?

Yes, I realize how absurd that sounds.
 
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
4,856
Reaction Score
19,621
Eric Pennekamp ‏@Epfourteen · 5h5 hours ago
@McMurphyESPN u post a little nugget about expan.for the 1st time in eons and have 0 follow up. No attempt to find a scoop on what he meant?

Brett McMurphyVerified account
‏@McMurphyESPN
@Epfourteen He’s probably just referring to C-USA and/or Sun Belt. Not a Power 5 league
 

pj

Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
8,617
Reaction Score
25,048
Looks like ESPN mgmt sent the word down. Kill the realignment speculation.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
4,122
Reaction Score
13,764
Greg Flugaur @flugempire · 24 hours ago
Big Ten Hockey will expand in the next few years and according to all public information it will not probably happen from inside B1G conf

Greg Flugaur @flugempire · 24 hours ago
Big Ten hockey on the BTN/Fox Sports has been beneficial to the network...reaping good ratings. Pie is growing. More content will be wanted

Greg Flugaur @flugempire · 24 hours ago
"@rwesthead: Interesting times in NCAA hockey. Penn State hockey program turned a profit this yr with $4.4M in revenue" Rutgers listening?
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,972
Reaction Score
208,814
Greg Flugaur @flugempire · 24 hours ago
Big Ten Hockey will expand in the next few years and according to all public information it will not probably happen from inside B1G conf

Greg Flugaur @flugempire · 24 hours ago
Big Ten hockey on the BTN/Fox Sports has been beneficial to the network...reaping good ratings. Pie is growing. More content will be wanted

Greg Flugaur @flugempire · 24 hours ago
"@rwesthead: Interesting times in NCAA hockey. Penn State hockey program turned a profit this yr with $4.4M in revenue" Rutgers listening?
Wrong thread. As much as I like Flugar, he is decidedly non-key.
 

MattMang23

Adding Nothing to the Conversation
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,150
Reaction Score
14,742
I still don't understand why you continually post on your enemies blog. We know you love FSU. We know FSU screwed UConn, but you persist.

But he didn't screw UConn. So what's the problem?
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
2,459
Reaction Score
4,612
But he didn't screw UConn. So what's the problem?
He is a supporter of their policies. He is always trying to rationalize their decisions. It just seems to me that he likes to rub salt in wounds. He is no different that BC posters here who try to justify their past actions.
 

dayooper

It's what I do. I drink and I know things.
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
1,667
Reaction Score
4,371
He is a supporter of their policies. He is always trying to rationalize their decisions. It just seems to me that he likes to rub salt in wounds. He is no different that BC posters here who try to justify their past actions.

Let it go, dude. The only thing you are accomplishing is making yourself look looney.

I think his perspective is a plus around here. It's very different from mine, but if we can't look at the other side as objectively as we can, we are useless. Billy presents his side with more respect than many of the ACC/ND slappies that have been banned here.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,326
Reaction Score
46,518
Let it go, dude. The only thing you are accomplishing is making yourself look looney.

I think his perspective is a plus around here. It's very different from mine, but if we can't look at the other side as objectively as we can, we are useless. Billy presents his side with more respect than many of the ACC/ND slappies that have been banned here.

Respectful? Ha. He's a troll. Proven on many occasions.

Banned? What? Who was banned?
 

pj

Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
8,617
Reaction Score
25,048
He may be imagining that btstimpy got banned because he stopped posting for a few months after Fishy repeatedly threatened him with banning. Our guests aren't aware that Fishy's threats are for show.

As for billybud, I like having him around. He may be a troll, but he's a droll troll.
 

dayooper

It's what I do. I drink and I know things.
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
1,667
Reaction Score
4,371
Respectful? Ha. He's a troll. Proven on many occasions.

Banned? What? Who was banned?

The ND tool Notre Dame Joe and his "BuG" crap.
 

Online statistics

Members online
735
Guests online
4,536
Total visitors
5,271

Forum statistics

Threads
157,022
Messages
4,077,412
Members
9,967
Latest member
UChuskman


Top Bottom