- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 8,175
- Reaction Score
- 21,416
Ask me after the gold medal ceremony.
What are you talking about, my post said the only 3 players on Seattle who were playing well were Sue, Stewie ,and Jewell, so where did I say Sue should not be playing?I still disagree. You think Team USA runs better with Whalen at the helm?
Maybe I misunderstood.What are you talking about, my post said the only 3 players on Seattle who were playing well were Sue, Stewie ,and Jewell, so where did I say Sue should not be playing?
Parker has never been a difficult teammate. Please show me one quote of a teammate saying that.Frankly, arguing that any of these players aren't deserving of their spot on the team is mostly folly. This is a really (really, really) good team. It was assembled by people who know their basketball, certainly better than some or all of posters I've seen here. It's not only folly, but it is also rather insulting. This IS our team. That's a done deal.
I was disappointed that former WNBA star-turned-commentator Lisa Leslie chose to go off on the NBA channel about the Parker non-selection. Yes, we'd guess they are friends. So? Several of my friends weren't selected either. It's almost that silly for Leslie to chide USA basketball for not picking Parker, but failing to give a reason other than "I like her game."
Let's face it. The elephant sitting on the folding chair is that at times Parker can be a difficult teammate and a diva. She IS a supreme talent. But on this team, attitude matters.
Any person can never have too many diamonds, Gold bricks, votes, ---an Olympic Coach can never have too many former Uconn players. The long long long answer--but true. However after watching CamBage (sp?) dominate, I am pleased Griner is on the USA team too.The long answer. Absolutely no. When the ex-Husky's predominate on the floor the ball moves side to side, post entry to perimeter. When not the ball stagnates.
]\Parker has never been a difficult teammate. Please show me one quote of a teammate saying that.
I disagree and yes, I do watch. Everyone doesn't agree that she's the best TODAY. That's an inaccurate statement. Her turnovers are lower, because due to her age and slower speed, she's keeping things very basic. She's still a very smart player and she knows not to take the same risks she did previously in her younger years. She doesn't break the defense down with her penetration any more and her defense just isn't there. This equates to the opponents out scoring them, thus having only 9 wins at this point of the season. With 2 Olympians on their team, if they are as good as advertised here, they'd have more wins.
The elephant described (Parker as difficult teammate and Diva) is more like a unicorn or urban legend=nonexistent!Frankly, arguing that any of these players aren't deserving of their spot on the team is mostly folly. This is a really (really, really) good team. It was assembled by people who know their basketball, certainly better than some or all of posters I've seen here. It's not only folly, but it is also rather insulting. This IS our team. That's a done deal.
I was disappointed that former WNBA star-turned-commentator Lisa Leslie chose to go off on the NBA channel about the Parker non-selection. Yes, we'd guess they are friends. So? Several of my friends weren't selected either. It's almost that silly for Leslie to chide USA basketball for not picking Parker, but failing to give a reason other than "I like her game."
Let's face it. The elephant sitting on the folding chair is that at times Parker can be a difficult teammate and a diva. She IS a supreme talent. But on this team, attitude matters.
I can certainly be somebody, and having done the research your Thesis-that "other schools dominated previous Olympic WBB teams" cannot be validated.I'm sure if anyone who took the time to look it up would find that other schools dominated previous Olympic WBB teams.
May I be the first to complain when the next Olympics has 4 or 5 as well even without Geno?I can certainly be somebody, and having done the research your Thesis-that "other schools dominated previous Olympic WBB teams" cannot be validated.
Over the last two Olympic UCONN has had 6 and 5 players on the US WBB Olympic roster. Only two schools UCONN 2004 & TN 2008 have had as many 3 former players on the same Olympic roster.
My question to Jim is: why is this an issue now? In 2012 there were more (6) former UCONN players on the Olympic team than this current team (5).
1976-None
1984-None
1988-None
1992 Theresa Edwards & Katrina McClain (Georgia)
1992 Vickie Orr & Carolyn Jones-Young (Auburn)
1996 Jennifer Azzi & Katy Steding (Stanford)
1996 Theresa Edwards & Katrina McClain (Georgia)
1996 Carla McGhee & Nikki McCray (TN)
2000 Chamique Holdsclaw & Nikki McCray (TN)
2004 Sue Bird, Diana Taurasi & Swim Cash (UCONN)
2004 TinaThompson & Lisa Leslie (USC)
2008 Simone Augustus & Sylvia Fowles (LSU)
2008 Kara Lawson, Tamika Catchings, & Candace Parker (TN)
2008 Sue Bird & Diana Taurasi (UCONN)
2012 Sue Bird, Diana Taurasi, Maya Moore, Asjha Jones, Swin Cash, Tina Charles (UCONN)
2012 Simone Augustus & Sylvia Fowles (LSU)
2012 Tamika Catchings, & Candace Parker (TN)
2016 Simone Augustus & Sylvia Fowles (LSU)
2016 Sue Bird, Diana Taurasi, Maya Moore, Tina Charles, Breanna Stewart (UCONN)
I can certainly be somebody, and having done the research your Thesis-that "other schools dominated previous Olympic WBB teams" cannot be validated.
Over the last two Olympic UCONN has had 6 and 5 players on the US WBB Olympic roster. Only two schools UCONN 2004 & TN 2008 have had as many 3 former players on the same Olympic roster.
My question to Jim is: why is this an issue now? In 2012 there were more (6) former UCONN players on the Olympic team than this current team (5).
1976-None
1984-None
1988-None
1992 Theresa Edwards & Katrina McClain (Georgia)
1992 Vickie Orr & Carolyn Jones-Young (Auburn)
1996 Jennifer Azzi & Katy Steding (Stanford)
1996 Theresa Edwards & Katrina McClain (Georgia)
1996 Carla McGhee & Nikki McCray (TN)
2000 Chamique Holdsclaw & Nikki McCray (TN)
2004 Sue Bird, Diana Taurasi & Swim Cash (UCONN)
2004 TinaThompson & Lisa Leslie (USC)
2008 Simone Augustus & Sylvia Fowles (LSU)
2008 Kara Lawson, Tamika Catchings, & Candace Parker (TN)
2008 Sue Bird & Diana Taurasi (UCONN)
2012 Sue Bird, Diana Taurasi, Maya Moore, Asjha Jones, Swin Cash, Tina Charles (UCONN)
2012 Simone Augustus & Sylvia Fowles (LSU)
2012 Tamika Catchings, & Candace Parker (TN)
2016 Simone Augustus & Sylvia Fowles (LSU)
2016 Sue Bird, Diana Taurasi, Maya Moore, Tina Charles, Breanna Stewart (UCONN)
Exactly. the WNBA season really had zero to do with who was selected. They had "tryouts" where many players were invited, and after evaluating them, the committee decided on the current team. Based on the WNBA performances this season, it seems clear that players like Ogwumike, Loyd, Sims and McBride (and even Jefferson) are all making cases for serious consideration the next time they have tryouts to select the NC team for the WC's in 2018. But the 5 UCONN players on the team are pretty much not only the best at their positions in the US, but arguably the best at their positions in the word.
Well, maybe Stewie not so much right now, but she's #5 in the league in scoring, #2 in rebounding, and #15 in assists. She's certainly holding her own. Bottom line - theSTew team would have more of a flavor of other schools if there were other players who were ready to step up at this time. Thing is, the last 2 players on the team probably were Augustus and Catchings so even if you took out the "weakest links" and replaced them with Loyd and Sims, you still would have 5 UCONN players on the team...
The 1992 "dream" Olympic team excluded Isaiah Thomas and Shaquille O'Neil. While I agree with your point that CP should be on the team to say it has never happened before is not accurate.That didn't happen and in the history of the Oympics, no elite level player has been spurned in this manner.
You are very confused (as are some others in this thread) on what the Olympic team is and what it's supposed to do/be. It is not an all-star team. It really doesn't matter what a player does in the WNBA, the Olympics are not the WNBA. The international game is quite different than the WNBA. There have been numerous competitions (prior Olympics, WCs, U23's, U21's U19's, etc.) and camps to evaluate the players. (along with international play) WNBA stats don't really mean anything in this area.Winning the gold isn't the issue. The US could field 2 teams and claim Gold and Silver. They are truly that much better than the competition. The issue is making sure that those who represent the USA are the best talent. That didn't happen and in the history of the Oympics, no elite level player has been spurned in this manner. Candace didn't deserve that type of treatment. She, like Stewart, Maya, EDD, DT, and Catchings, should be shoe ins for as long as they can compete at a high level.
What I love (not like) about your explanation is that is completely based on basketball ability and team fit and not personality. The personality aspect, specifically that accusation Parker was a bad teammate and Diva is something else than many on this board seem to be confused about.You are very confused (as are some others in this thread) on what the Olympic team is and what it's supposed to do/be. It is not an all-star team. It really doesn't matter what a player does in the WNBA, the Olympics are not the WNBA. The international game is quite different than the WNBA. There have been numerous competitions (prior Olympics, WCs, U23's, U21's U19's, etc.) and camps to evaluate the players. (along with international play) WNBA stats don't really mean anything in this area.
The Olympic team is just that...a TEAM (not a collection of WNBA all-stars) that will win the Gold. That's it, nothing more. It is not supposed to be a representation of colleges or WNBA teams. Prior experience matters a lot (whether right or wrong here, and this is where an argument can be made) a whole lot. Hence Bird and Catchings and Augustus.
Personally I would have had Parker on MY team. I am willing to say though, that I might have been wrong in that. Watching this team, I'm not sure where she would fit. She's definitely not a 1/2/3 so she wouldn't replace Bird/DT/Whalen/Augustus/McCaughtry/Moore/Catchings. I would not take Parker over Fowles/Charles/Griner in the Post. Parker is not really a post, at least defensively. She's a 4, but not really a stretch 4. (Sure a point forward, but this team doesn't need that when you have Bird/DT/Whalen). And as stretch fours, EDD and Stewart have much better range. I really can't see where Parker would fit in on this team. I like Parker, I think she's a great player. But after watching what they want to do with this team, I don't really see where she would have fit in.
I think the committee might have gotten this one right, against my judgment.
Really good post. And I agree particularly with the segment that I highlighted. It is the balance of the team and especially the defensive strengths combined with offensive range that I think explains the selections. EDD is the 'wild card' to my mind who was not available for the last Olympic team and represents the position that Parker was competing for. The other player that I think falls into that category is Catchings and I think that is as much about loyalty as about playing capabilities. Catchings also remains one of the great defensive players, while her offense is secondary.You are very confused (as are some others in this thread) on what the Olympic team is and what it's supposed to do/be. It is not an all-star team. It really doesn't matter what a player does in the WNBA, the Olympics are not the WNBA. The international game is quite different than the WNBA. There have been numerous competitions (prior Olympics, WCs, U23's, U21's U19's, etc.) and camps to evaluate the players. (along with international play) WNBA stats don't really mean anything in this area.
The Olympic team is just that...a TEAM (not a collection of WNBA all-stars) that will win the Gold. That's it, nothing more. It is not supposed to be a representation of colleges or WNBA teams. Prior experience matters a lot (whether right or wrong here, and this is where an argument can be made) a whole lot. Hence Bird and Catchings and Augustus.
Personally I would have had Parker on MY team. I am willing to say though, that I might have been wrong in that. Watching this team, I'm not sure where she would fit. She's definitely not a 1/2/3 so she wouldn't replace Bird/DT/Whalen/Augustus/McCaughtry/Moore/Catchings. I would not take Parker over Fowles/Charles/Griner in the Post. Parker is not really a post, at least defensively. She's a 4, but not really a stretch 4. (Sure a point forward, but this team doesn't need that when you have Bird/DT/Whalen). And as stretch fours, EDD and Stewart have much better range. I really can't see where Parker would fit in on this team. I like Parker, I think she's a great player. But after watching what they want to do with this team, I don't really see where she would have fit in.
I think the committee might have gotten this one right, against my judgement.
Winning the gold isn't the issue.
in the history of the Oympics, no elite level player has been spurned in this manner.
I don't think it's personality. If it's anything NOT basketball ability, then it could be missing the WC's. They Committee really, really likes commitment to the program.What I love (not like) about your explanation is that is completely based on basketball ability and team fit and not personality. The personality aspect, specifically that accusation Parker was a bad teammate and Diva is something else than many on this board seem to be confused about.
Yea, it's seems pretty obvious, Catching is filling that 12 man slot (like AJ did last time). She's there for 1) leadership, 2) when they want to ratchet up the defense, and 3) because she's put so much into the program.The other player that I think falls into that category is Catchings and I think that is as much about loyalty as about playing capabilities. Catchings also remains one of the great defensive players, while her offense is secondary.
The USA team is not really concerned about offense - all the players on the team are capable of scoring 20 points a game if called upon to do so. The concern is more both their commitment to play defense, and their willingness to play on a team where taking 3 shots and scoring 2 points game after game does not bother them at all. (Or getting five minutes in blow out wins doesn't bother them either.)
http://gifsec.com/wp-content/uploads/GIF/2014/08/GIF-Excuse-me-WTF-OMG--Say-what-What-GIF.gif?gs=aYes. It would be best to have more universities represented. Stanford was a main stay in the final 4 and then Notre Dame has been in the final 4 for many years. These teams don't have that type of success without having a player that is worthy of being on the Olympic team. Yes, Candace Parker should also be on the team. The more universities that are represented, the better it is for the growth of the game. They should have dwindled the list down and then named the final team after surveying their play in the WNBA this season. By doing this, they could have easily seen who the best performers are right now. More youth should be on the team and unless a player is still a superstar performing at the same level they did in their early years, they shouldn't be given an automatic bid. It should be earned.