So was she speaking to other coaches (or their representatives) before she applied for her release?
Can't prove a negative, but no one has publicly alleged that she did. And she has indicated she hasn't:
I can't even contact schools, it's frustrating with how my situation is now as I'm about to leave for Spain, I would like to know what I'm going to before leaving. ( From Swish Appeal interview)
Based on certain of your posts in the other thread, one can't help wondering if this is just your way of suggesting we don't have enough facts to take up Leti's cause -- that maybe she's at fault in some way. However, be your question sincere or rhetorical, here's a summary of what's been reported.
One of Ms. Romero's complaints -- a big one -- is that she was never given any reason for the denial of her application. However, leaked info suggests the following:
KSU's relations with the fired coaching staff were tense, and one media account characterizes Leti as the unfortunate rope in a tug o' war between the parties.
Currie originally thought, among other nefarious things the departing coaches might be doing, that they might be tampering -- i.e. implying to other schools with whom they sought employment that they could bring Ms. Romero with them. This was the apparent basis for his original denial.
Then three things happened.
First, Ms. Romero unsuccessfully appealed to the committee. Second, the former coaches landed en masse at a school that wasn't even on Ms. Romero's previously submitted transfer approval list. And third, Currie finally got around to interviewing Ms. Romero herself on the subject he'd already ruled on.
Following which he evidently concluded his suspicion of tampering had been unfounded, as he wrote a letter to the committee suggesting, based on new evidence, that they reverse their decision upholding his original transfer denial. (KSU has sought unsuccessfully to suppress this "stolen" letter.)
The only school on Ms. Romero's list thus far to emerge in this saga is Middle TN State. They played it straight, asked to speak with her, received permission from KSU, then received an attempted retraction of that permission based on a claim of "clerical error." (I said this was a fiasco, did I not?)
MTSU then asked the NCAA, which reportedly said the permission couldn't be retracted -- as in a card laid is a card played, and the student athlete shouldn't be jerked around in that manner. Which is, in the overall context, putting it mildly.
And that's where it stands at the moment.
