I've always wondered why people think players would develop more/better if they stayed in college. In college, he has a limited amount of time in the gym, limited access to coaches, limited practice time with a team and most important, he's practicing against college players. If he goes pro, he's got about 100 times as many practices in a year. He's got unlimited access to coaches and training time. He doesn't have an obligation to be taking care of classes. And he gets to go against pro players. Why do you think kids like Oak played so much better after a few weeks of big man camp against the best and taught by the best? As a pro, that's not a two week camp - it's a 365 day camp.
If he has the potential, it will be brought out faster if he goes pro. He needs another year of college is ridiculous. Do I want to see him stay for another year? Hell yes, but that's only because I'm selfish fan. I am not for a second thinking what is best for the kid.
Nope, I think you are wrong. The reason is NBA teams rarely practice. This is why the NBDL was created and why young players who are not playing are better off in a developmental league. Although the problem there is the coaching stinks and the level of play is more free-for-all vs college.
You don't practice much in the NBA and if you don't play the only work you get is walk-thru's and shootarounds. Its reasonable to guess that players will practice, develop and be coached once basketball is their job and practice facilities and coaching resources are available, but 95% of the team's efforts are geared at winning games and guys who will develop in the long-term don't get attention. Coaches are not GM's and projects are not helpful to them. Maybe, maybe maybe with the right team and the right staff of assistants and vets to teach him AD would be 'coached' but that is the exception not the rule.
Celtics example/excerpt below - (granted this is magnified in shortened season and for older teams):
One of the issues the
Celtics had last year was finding time to practice. With a veteran core that the Celtics have, a lot off-days are just that - days off.
Not that any team can practice every day that there isn't a game, but the Celtics were far, far from that being the case.
OK, they barely practiced.
Doc Rivers said it numerous times last season: the team just hasn't had enough time to work on issues that need to be addressed.
So how the heck will they practice this season? Sure, it's only "two extra games per month" and that doesn't seem like much, but it will have a bigger affect in terms of getting in the gym for practice. Not only will the C's obviously not practice on those two days a month that there are games, but they're going to need more rest now most likely - and in months with less time for it.
Rivers expressed worry that practices would be few and far between, saying "yeah" when the question was raised.
"That again, we'll find that out with the scheduling.," he said. "I've done a lot of - not a lot but some research. I know in the last time this happened with the 50 game [season]
there were some coaches that didn't have a practice at all during that season and there were some that did it another way. So we'll figure it out."
Wait, is Rivers throwing out the idea that they may never practice?