- Joined
- Jan 17, 2013
- Messages
- 2,803
- Reaction Score
- 9,549
See FSU football.How about putting the best teams and league champs in - that’s it - no other political BS criteria.
See FSU football.How about putting the best teams and league champs in - that’s it - no other political BS criteria.
Perfect stage to make the world see and offer the basketball gods the sacrifices they want. 6-the hard way!!!!!!!the P5 conferences seem to have it out for the BE & to squash UConn's chances but Hurley will use this as fuel to keep the guys focused, I believe. Only 3 bids in the second best conference in the nation is a travesty.
If only Temple remembered they already got paid for they efforts against UAB 10 days prior.don't forget the American Conference champ UAB!
Auburn hasn't played a team of UConn's quality. We're at a minimum a tier above whoever they played in those seven games.Auburn was perfect against Quads 2-4. Versus Quad 1? 3-7. They beat Quad 1s 30% of the time. It gets worse: against Quad 1a they are 1-6.
This means Auburn has beaten a team of UConn’s quality once in 7 tries this season.
A lot of worrying about a team that hasn’t proven they can win against UConn.
Why is it such a pain in the backside to get there? I have gone to concerts at Barclays taking the metro and subway and I'm probably not as familiar with NYC as you are.If this was any of all but a couple of our prior teams I would be a little angry with how this fell out but this year, with this year's team, it doesn't bother me at all. If anyone should be complaining about how things fell out with arguably the best second, third and fourth seed in the same bracket as the overall number, it should be the schools that are argualy the best second, third and fourth seeds as their paths have a massive road block (us).
The one thing that has angered me a bit about this is the location of the first two rounds. It's irritating as hell that where they are playing is geographically so close to where I live but also such a pain in the backside to get to.
That was primarily a joke, but the few times I've driven to Brooklyn (from late 1980's to early 1990's) the route (IIRC) was 95 to 287 to Saw Mill to Henry Hudson to West Side highway into Brooklyn.Why is it such a pain in the backside to get there? I have gone to concerts at Barclays taking the metro and subway and I'm probably not as familiar with NYC as you are.
THAT is one EXCELLENT summary of what took place! Kudos to you!The Committee was dealt a tough hand: Houston, Purdue, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arizona ALL lost. Only North Carolina got to its tournament finals. Creighton, Kentucky, and Duke lost before their finals too.
It was like that week when everybody in the top 10 lost to an unranked team. The losses went further into the Top 25. Pretty much only UConn and Duke won during that episode
Just as the weekly poll voters were getting pretty much forced to choose UConn then, the Committee similarly had to make UConn the overall #1 seed for the Tournament after this weekend's games
Unless UConn collapsed, the Committee had already been
shoehorned into placing UConn into Brooklyn, with a path to Boston. What a mess. This waa already going to be uncomfortable, somewhat like having Jeff Emmert congratulate the 2024 "hungry Huskies," as labeled by Shabazz Napier
The only way out of this mess would be to give them the 2nd best Big 12, Big 10, and SEC teams (as the 2-4 seeds), and spice it up further with last year's runner-up as the 5, and the team SDSU had beaten in the Final 4 game to get the Championship.
And then all the 1 seeds lost.
The computers knew what to do; the poor human beings were stuck in a very hard place. So what did they do? Nothing. They slapped Overall #1 on UConn, and left things as they were.
They kept the most dubious P4 teams (Michigan State, Virginia, Mississippi State, and TCU) in the field; decided not to choose between the half-dozen Mountain West peers (drawing the line at UNLV, which stalled at 19 wins, though one was against Creighton) by inviting them all in a demonstrated show of respect for a non-major conference that had developed a reputation for late night entertainment; and, in the interest of keeping things simple, correspondingly decided against choosing between SHU, PC, and Seton Hall by just saying No to all three.
Let's face, it wasn't the Committee's fault that two of the solid #1s, and every other contender for the fourth spot faltered. And UConn got its two-pack of friendly locations and the prestige of being the top seed for only the small cost of having to blatantly lie in assigning questionable numeric rankings to the other teams in the East Region to make the narrative 'fit.'
Remember, UConn will still be favored in all of the games. And its top potential foes will remain hubris, distraction, dissension, and injury. We as fans can make a difference by not contributing to the first three of these risk factors, by not accepting any invitations to organize & grow negative energy around them.
Last year's West region was top-heavy with highly-rated KenPom teams, and UConn emerged as the 4-seed.
This year's team will play its games one-at-a-time, and the team is currently playing well. Prepare for a successful weekend in Brooklyn, and see where that leads.
Go UConn!
The Committee was dealt a tough hand: Houston, Purdue, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arizona ALL lost. Only North Carolina got to its tournament finals. Creighton, Kentucky, and Duke lost before their finals too.
It was like that week when everybody in the top 10 lost to an unranked team. The losses went further into the Top 25. Pretty much only UConn and Duke won during that episode
Just as the weekly poll voters were getting pretty much forced to choose UConn then, the Committee similarly had to make UConn the overall #1 seed for the Tournament after this weekend's games
Unless UConn collapsed, the Committee had already been
shoehorned into placing UConn into Brooklyn, with a path to Boston. What a mess. This waa already going to be uncomfortable, somewhat like having Jeff Emmert congratulate the 2024 "hungry Huskies," as labeled by Shabazz Napier
The only way out of this mess would be to give them the 2nd best Big 12, Big 10, and SEC teams (as the 2-4 seeds), and spice it up further with last year's runner-up as the 5, and the team SDSU had beaten in the Final 4 game to get the Championship.
And then all the 1 seeds lost.
The computers knew what to do; the poor human beings were stuck in a very hard place. So what did they do? Nothing. They slapped Overall #1 on UConn, and left things as they were.
They kept the most dubious P4 teams (Michigan State, Virginia, Mississippi State, and TCU) in the field; decided not to choose between the half-dozen Mountain West peers (drawing the line at UNLV, which stalled at 19 wins, though one was against Creighton) by inviting them all in a demonstrated show of respect for a non-major conference that had developed a reputation for late night entertainment; and, in the interest of keeping things simple, correspondingly decided against choosing between SHU, PC, and Seton Hall by just saying No to all three.
Let's face, it wasn't the Committee's fault that two of the solid #1s, and every other contender for the fourth spot faltered. And UConn got its two-pack of friendly locations and the prestige of being the top seed for only the small cost of having to blatantly lie in assigning questionable numeric rankings to the other teams in the East Region to make the narrative 'fit.'
Remember, UConn will still be favored in all of the games. And its top potential foes will remain hubris, distraction, dissension, and injury. We as fans can make a difference by not contributing to the first three of these risk factors, by not accepting any invitations to organize & grow negative energy around them.
Last year's West region was top-heavy with highly-rated KenPom teams, and UConn emerged as the 4-seed.
This year's team will play its games one-at-a-time, and the team is currently playing well. Prepare for a successful weekend in Brooklyn, and see where that leads.
Go UConn!
They could have just swapped Alabama and Auburn after Auburn won the SEC, and then things would have been reasonable.The Committee was dealt a tough hand: Houston, Purdue, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arizona ALL lost. Only North Carolina got to its tournament finals. Creighton, Kentucky, and Duke lost before their finals too.
It was like that week when everybody in the top 10 lost to an unranked team. The losses went further into the Top 25. Pretty much only UConn and Duke won during that episode
Just as the weekly poll voters were getting pretty much forced to choose UConn then, the Committee similarly had to make UConn the overall #1 seed for the Tournament after this weekend's games
Unless UConn collapsed, the Committee had already been
shoehorned into placing UConn into Brooklyn, with a path to Boston. What a mess. This waa already going to be uncomfortable, somewhat like having Jeff Emmert congratulate the 2024 "hungry Huskies," as labeled by Shabazz Napier
The only way out of this mess would be to give them the 2nd best Big 12, Big 10, and SEC teams (as the 2-4 seeds), and spice it up further with last year's runner-up as the 5, and the team SDSU had beaten in the Final 4 game to get the Championship.
And then all the 1 seeds lost.
The computers knew what to do; the poor human beings were stuck in a very hard place. So what did they do? Nothing. They slapped Overall #1 on UConn, and left things as they were.
They kept the most dubious P4 teams (Michigan State, Virginia, Mississippi State, and TCU) in the field; decided not to choose between the half-dozen Mountain West peers (drawing the line at UNLV, which stalled at 19 wins, though one was against Creighton) by inviting them all in a demonstrated show of respect for a non-major conference that had developed a reputation for late night entertainment; and, in the interest of keeping things simple, correspondingly decided against choosing between SHU, PC, and Seton Hall by just saying No to all three.
Let's face, it wasn't the Committee's fault that two of the solid #1s, and every other contender for the fourth spot faltered. And UConn got its two-pack of friendly locations and the prestige of being the top seed for only the small cost of having to blatantly lie in assigning questionable numeric rankings to the other teams in the East Region to make the narrative 'fit.'
Remember, UConn will still be favored in all of the games. And its top potential foes will remain hubris, distraction, dissension, and injury. We as fans can make a difference by not contributing to the first three of these risk factors, by not accepting any invitations to organize & grow negative energy around them.
Last year's West region was top-heavy with highly-rated KenPom teams, and UConn emerged as the 4-seed.
This year's team will play its games one-at-a-time, and the team is currently playing well. Prepare for a successful weekend in Brooklyn, and see where that leads.
Go UConn!
Most people are just highlighting the inferior work of selection committee. It is not just UConn fans but most bracketologists and announcers as well.The complaining on here is painful. Everyone said UConn had a cake walk last year to the Championship. The committee was 100% going to stick it to UConn this year. How did none of you see this coming?
Also, who cares? You have to play good teams at some point and you should be up for the challenge. It’s not like you have to beat every single team.
You think all these teams are happy seeing UConn in the bracket. Stop complaining. You should enjoy the competition, not running from it.
Shameful how scared some of you sound.
That's an interesting route that I can fully picture & see how it works, but had never really occurred to me as a driving option from northeast of the city.That was primarily a joke, but the few times I've driven to Brooklyn (from late 1980's to early 1990's) the route (IIRC) was 95 to 287 to Saw Mill to Henry Hudson to West Side highway into Brooklyn.
I had a number of friends from Westchester many decades ago, one of whom lived for a number of years in Brooklyn (barely over the bridge) who knew most of the better ways to get around by car from Westchester throughout the boroughs (well, all but Staten Island). From around 1988 through around 1994 this was the best route lower Fairfield County (things may have changed), which included attending his wedding a litttle more than thirty years ago.That's an interesting route that I can fully picture & see how it works, but had never really occurred to me as a driving option from northeast of the city.
You got me to check out what GMaps app recommended, and it provided I-95 to Whitestone Bridge, Whitestone Expressway (678) to BQE (278) into Tillary St (downtown Bklyn) to Flatbush Ave, which is pretty much what I would have thought. But that wasn't offered to make you wrong in any way. Instead, I appreciate your awakening me to going wide-west and through the Battery tunnel.
It could absolutely make sense sometimes, very much akin to when I've chosen to get crosstown eastward to depart Manhattan from a day in Hudson River/west side environs by way of the streets/avenues/roads/bridges that drop me into the Bruckner/I-95 corridor.
And that sparks recollection of my learning from Yankee fan friends that I could shoot up the Major Deegan to get to Westchester to Fairfield County.
It's fascinating that the infrequency of visits by people focused on an arena event can yield unexpected routes that didn't readily occurr to me when I lived within NYC/LI and used the various roads for all kinds of purposes.
Thank you.
No, this means Auburn has never beaten a team of UConn's quality, and only beaten teams a step down from UConn once in seven tries. Your final sentence only rings truer.This means Auburn has beaten a team of UConn’s quality once in 7 tries this season.
A lot of worrying about a team that hasn’t proven they can win against UConn.
I still choose Hutch to Cross County to Saw Mill to HHudson to West Side as my preferred route in from CT. Just never extended it in Brooklyn.I had a number of friends from Westchester many decades ago, one of whom lived for a number of years in Brooklyn (barely over the bridge) who knew most of the better ways to get around by car from Westchester throughout the boroughs (well, all but Staten Island). From around 1988 through around 1994 this was the best route lower Fairfield County (things may have changed), which included attending his wedding a litttle more than thirty years ago.
I think you had it right the first time............
I considered thatI think you had it right the first time............
Read it again dude. Quad 1A. That’s UConnNo, this means Auburn has never beaten a team of UConn's quality, and only beaten teams a step down from UConn once in seven tries. Your final sentence only rings truer.
Proposed:
Auburn's ceiling is UConn's C+ game, they usually reach it and beat mediocre to pretty good teams.
If UConn played at C+ level and below all season, they would probably have a record similar to Auburn's. .
UConn rarely plays its C+ level game - maybe 10% of the time (Creighton, Seton Hall,?).
Given a 10% chance UConn is playing badly enough to lose to Auburn; and maybe an 80% chance that Auburn plays well enough to take advantage of that, so I put Auburn's chances at 8% - but wait - they still need to get past Mr. Wolf