Some HoopGurlz 2021 movement | The Boneyard

Some HoopGurlz 2021 movement

Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
3,629
Reaction Score
11,973
Saylor up to #10 in Blue Star.

Looking back after two or three years, which rating service is most accurate in identifying the stars? Huge discrepancy. Should they be averaged together to get a more accurate picture of who will excel?
 

CocoHusky

1,000,001 BY points
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
17,208
Reaction Score
73,885
Looking back after two or three years, which rating service is most accurate in identifying the stars? Huge discrepancy. Should they be averaged together to get a more accurate picture of who will excel?
The ratings are like BBQ sauces-regional, highly dependent on personal taste, based on unknown but traditional recipes. Asking which is the most accurate is like asking which is the best BBQ sauce. Blue Star has tracked best with UCONN successful players over the years and has been accused of having an east coast (regional) bias and is aligned with the Philly Belles AAU organization. All Star Girls Report tend to find the hidden gems and predicted stardom for Gabby Williams when hardly anyone else did at a time when Gabby was injured. Prospects Nation grew out of ESPN Hoopgurlz and those two tend to be in sync because these common rating principles. 1) They do not rate players unless they have seen them play live 2) The rating are based on a projection of the position the player is expected to play at the college level 3) Injured player tend to drop but not significantly. 4) HS level of competition is highly highly discounted instead they tend to rely heavily on AAU showcase tournaments and USA basketball trials.
Although Prospects Nation grew out of ESPN Hoopgurlz and have nearly the same rating philosophies you will occasionally find huge discrepancies in the ratings. The explanations for the discrepancies can usually be traced by to one of those items listed as 1-4 previously. A simple example might be one rating service has not seen the player live while the other has and was impressed. Another example is that one service might be projecting the player to be a post in college and the other might be projecting them to be stretch 4 type forward. Saylor is a good example of this because even Geno doesn't know yet what position Saylor is going to play when she gets to UCONN.
The rating should definitely be averaged and out of that average you get much more useful information. There are 3 posters that have done composite ratings. @meyers7 , @vowelguy and @WBBfolllwer.
The 2020 Composite ranking is some where in this thread.
One other thing regarding Hoopgurlz specifically, be leery of cross promotion (aka click bait) with ESPN. In addition to the ratings in Hoopgurlz ESPN also has a rankings of girls HS teams. When you read through rankings ESPN makes a point to hyper link the players and their rankings. In this sense Paige was a dream for ESPN because she was the #1 player on the number #1 HS team in the country. In addition to HS rankings ESPN also host a HS tournament at end of the season. The tournament features 4 of the best HS girls and boys team in the country and used to be called the ESPN Rise now called Dick's National Championship. Here there is heavy cross promotion too from ESPN and the teams that get invited are usually those with highly ranked ESPN player. Paige team was extended an invite this season but was not allowed to participate per Minnesota state rules.
 
Last edited:

oldude

bamboo lover
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
16,847
Reaction Score
149,116
While it may not be as pronounced as it once was, there has frequently appeared to be a distinct UConn bounce for HS players that Geno has signed through the years, particularly when final ratings come out at the end of a player’s senior season. But as we’ve seen, even the Geno Auriemma seal of approval is not a guarantee of success at the college level.

Of course with every player that bounces upward there is at least one player that falls. We’ve seen that with two of ND’s recruits on Hoopgurlz. SB was the #1 recruit for the longest time in the class of 2019 before falling to #6. In the class of 2020, Natajia Marshall plummeted all the way to 34. Some of Marshall’s decline is injury related, but having seen her play twice in her jr season at the Federation Cup with CTK, other than her size, I couldn’t figure out why she was rated so highly in the first place.
 
Last edited:

DefenseBB

Snark is always appreciated!
Joined
Nov 10, 2016
Messages
7,912
Reaction Score
28,739
Looking back after two or three years, which rating service is most accurate in identifying the stars? Huge discrepancy. Should they be averaged together to get a more accurate picture of who will excel?
Why do you say this and do you have any anecdotal evidence to support this statement or is it just a guess?
 

DefenseBB

Snark is always appreciated!
Joined
Nov 10, 2016
Messages
7,912
Reaction Score
28,739
The ratings are like BBQ sauces-regional, highly dependent on personal taste, based on unknown but traditional recipes. Asking which is the most accurate is like asking which is the best BBQ sauce. Blue Star has tracked best with UCONN successful players over the years and has been accused of having an east coast (regional) bias and is aligned with the Philly Belles AAU organization. All Star Girls Report tend to find the hidden gems and predicted stardom for Gabby Williams when hardly anyone else did at a time when Gabby was injured. Prospects Nation grew out of ESPN Hoopgurlz and those two tend to be in sync because these common rating principles. 1) They do not rate players unless they have seen them play live 2) The rating are based on a projection of the position the player is expected to play at the college level 3) Injured player tend to drop but not significantly. 4) HS level of competition is highly highly discounted instead they tend to rely heavily on AAU showcase tournaments and USA basketball trials.
Although Prospects Nation grew out of ESPN Hoopgurlz and have nearly the same rating philosophies you will occasionally find huge discrepancies in the ratings. The explanations for the discrepancies can usually be traced by to one of those items listed as 1-4 previously....
The rating should definitely be averaged and out of that average you get much more useful information. There are 3 posters that have done composite ratings. @meyers7 , @vowelguy and @WBBfolllwer.
The 2020 Composite ranking is some where in this thread.
...so my analysis a couple of weeks ago is already forgotten...:oops:

 

CocoHusky

1,000,001 BY points
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
17,208
Reaction Score
73,885
Why do you say this and do you have any anecdotal evidence to support this statement or is it just a guess?
Diamond Johnson ( Rutgers) 2020: ESPN #5 and ProspectsNation #44
Kennedy Brown ( Oregon State) 2019: McDonalds' Game AA player, ranked 100 by ProspectsNation and 19th in ESPN.
Raven Farley. ( LSU) in 2017: McDonalds' Game AA player, Ranked 14 by ESPN and 100 + by ESPN.
Sidney Cooks Michigan State now at Mississippi state) in 2017: McDonalds' Game AA player, Ranked 5th by ESPN and 69 by ProspectsNation.
Happens every year!
 

CocoHusky

1,000,001 BY points
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
17,208
Reaction Score
73,885
...so my analysis a couple of weeks ago is already forgotten...:oops:

Never. BTW I glad I got a chance to reread this because I did not catch this the first time around.
In your original post you stated:
"Transfers have made the WBCA-Elena Delle Donne and Courtney Williams (Texas A&M to South Florida), so transfers beware!"
The Courtney Williams that played at A&M was not the same Courtney Williams that played at South Florida.
They were both terrific players just not the same player. Considering that EDD was only in Storrs for a few days in the summer I'm not sure that qualifies as a transfer. Transfers should definitely beware!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 28, 2018
Messages
3,730
Reaction Score
11,684
Diamond Johnson ( Rutgers) 2020: ESPN #5 and ProspectsNation #44
Kennedy Brown ( Oregon State) 2019: McDonalds' Game AA player, ranked 100 by ProspectsNation and 19th in ESPN.
Raven Farley. ( LSU) in 2017: McDonalds' Game AA player, Ranked 14 by ESPN and 100 + by ESPN.
Sidney Cooks Michigan State now at Mississippi state) in 2017: McDonalds' Game AA player, Ranked 5th by ESPN and 69 by ProspectsNation.
Happens every year!
Also Aubrey Griffin -- #90 ProspectsNation; #21 HoopGurlz
 

EricLA

Cronus
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
14,991
Reaction Score
81,540
While it may not be as pronounced as it once was, there has frequently appeared to be a distinct UConn bounce for HS players that Geno has signed through the years, particularly when final ratings come out at the end of a player’s senior season. But as we’ve seen, even the Geno Auriemma seal of approval is not a guarantee of success at the college level.

Of course with every player that bounces upward there is at least one player that falls. We’ve seen that with two of ND’s recruits on Hoopgurlz. SB was the #1 recruit for the longest time in the class of 2019 before falling to #6. In the class of 2020, Natajia Marshall plummeted all the way to 34. Some of Marshall’s decline is injury related, but having seen her play twice in her jr season at the Federation Cup with CTK, other than her size, I couldn’t figure out why she was rated so highly in the first place.
Question - is it a UCONN bounce, or is that just coincidence? UCONN has gotten several really good players over the past several years who were injured at various times during their early high school careers. Other players like Griffin, were way under the radar and it wasn't until she almost made the U-17 or U-18 USA teams that her ratings bumped up.

I know it's a chicken/egg thing. UCONN generally looks for talented players. Some are under the radar. Once we get involved, they are scrutinized more closely. But is the bump because UCONN offered, or because they were always that good, but suddenly others are noticing it too?!!
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2018
Messages
551
Reaction Score
747
Question - is it a UCONN bounce, or is that just coincidence? UCONN has gotten several really good players over the past several years who were injured at various times during their early high school careers. Other players like Griffin, were way under the radar and it wasn't until she almost made the U-17 or U-18 USA teams that her ratings bumped up.

I know it's a chicken/egg thing. UCONN generally looks for talented players. Some are under the radar. Once we get involved, they are scrutinized more closely. But is the bump because UCONN offered, or because they were always that good, but suddenly others are noticing it too?!!

If any of the top 15 teams offer an under the radar kid, they always get a ton more attention. I bet you could offer a kid that wouldn't start juco and some teams would offer sight unseen just because of an offer from the big time universities.
 

oldude

bamboo lover
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
16,847
Reaction Score
149,116
Question - is it a UCONN bounce, or is that just coincidence? UCONN has gotten several really good players over the past several years who were injured at various times during their early high school careers. Other players like Griffin, were way under the radar and it wasn't until she almost made the U-17 or U-18 USA teams that her ratings bumped up.

I know it's a chicken/egg thing. UCONN generally looks for talented players. Some are under the radar. Once we get involved, they are scrutinized more closely. But is the bump because UCONN offered, or because they were always that good, but suddenly others are noticing it too?!!
Good question. I don’t really know. But for the record, I’ve always viewed it as an egg/chicken thing......;)
 

CamrnCrz1974

Good Guy for a Dookie
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
2,040
Reaction Score
11,898
Question - is it a UCONN bounce, or is that just coincidence?

One of the best things about ESPN/Hoopgurlz is that Dan Olson lists some of the events at which he has seen the individual players.

So it is possible that UConn's increased interest in a player or a verbal commitment to UConn coincides with a player's rise in the rankings because of the additional opportunities for viewing said player, through high school tournaments and state championships, AAU and traveling events, Team USA tryouts, etc.
 

MSGRET

MSG, US Army Retired
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
6,404
Reaction Score
35,632
Heck ESPN's HoopGurls doesn't even have Paige as an McDonalds AA. They need to get their act together if they want to put out information on Women's basketball.

  • GradePlayer InfoStatus
  • 98
    Paige Bueckers, PG

    • POS Rank PG #1
    • HT 5-11
    • HS Hopkins H.S. (MN)
    Signed
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
3,629
Reaction Score
11,973
Why do you say this and do you have any anecdotal evidence to support this statement or is it just a guess?

Take for example the very different ratings of UConn recruits on ESPN and Blue Star. Others have listed other examples here.
 

DefenseBB

Snark is always appreciated!
Joined
Nov 10, 2016
Messages
7,912
Reaction Score
28,739
Take for example the very different ratings of UConn recruits on ESPN and Blue Star. Others have listed other examples here.
Well, you mention "Stars" and when I look back at the HG top 10 Rankings, other than Gabby Williams who was #14, HG seems to have gotten it correct. Kia Nurse was #33 and has proven to be a great pro and while we loved her on our team, she was the 4th fiddle behind Stewie #1, Mo #2, Tuck #6, KML #1, KLS #1, Pheesa #6.

Just where is the outrage that you suggest? Who exactly did they "miss on"?
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
2,844
Reaction Score
9,060
If any of the top 15 teams offer an under the radar kid, they always get a ton more attention. I bet you could offer a kid that wouldn't start juco and some teams would offer sight unseen just because of an offer from the big time universities.
Funny how you put UConn in the same grouping as the next 14 ;)
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,631
Reaction Score
25,756
Relying on free public rankings is like buying stocks based on something you see or hear on a cable business show rather than hiring an advisor in a fiduciary relationship. You get what you pay for.
 

Online statistics

Members online
614
Guests online
4,824
Total visitors
5,438

Forum statistics

Threads
156,992
Messages
4,075,801
Members
9,965
Latest member
deltaop99


Top Bottom