That's not the issue at all. The issue is that your need to know (and mine) must be (and will always be) secondary to Megan's privacy. Megan will decide what and when she wants to tell us. We do not get to ask!
Only a slight difference of opinion, Coco. We can ask, but in doing so aren't performing a positive function and have no right to an answer.
Asking for more facts without a need to know, e.g. a university fact-finding/remedial function, is bad form, IMO. It runs counter to one of the attractions of #MeToo -- that you can overcome your fear of being put under a microscope if you speak up.
Some very prominent participants have given details, others have kept it general. That's up to them. It's a big step either way. Asking them to go further because of one's curiosity can be counterproductive and even smack a bit of titillation.
I applaud all the #MeToo women, the vast majority of whom I take to be sincere. After all, it's not exactly great publicity for the self-seeking.
The timing may be tough in a particular instance (as it may be here) but the important thing is for those with a sincere grievance to participate -- i.e. to contribute toward the goal of putting improper behavior in its shameful and hopefully dwindling place.
