- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 4,191
- Reaction Score
- 10,696
We won none! And that's indesputable, but it was Delaney's call, and that of the members of the conference who put it to a vote. The question is, was uconn factored into the mix or the equation? If you guys were, then the choice would've been simple. Take uconn and Rutgers, and not take UMd, or take UMd and uconn and that's it. However, that wasn't the case. At the end of the day, it wasn't just baskrtball, and all other non revenue sports they were inspecting, they looked at the entire scope of things, being tv sets, potential, brand expansion, recruiting, demographics, and market. Some of which you have, but for some reason, and I don't know why, you guys came up short.
When we all found out the BT was adding, some of us all thought it would be fuND, and perhaps you, but from people in the know, you guys weren't factored into the equation at all. As Delaney once siad, he's looking at the next 100 years, and not a quick fix.
Hey Skippy, I don't duck*ing care! I simply pointed out that I thought the BiG made a mistake taking Rutgers over UCONN. You live on this board to constantly remind us that the BiG did in fact take Rutgers over UCONN. It's tired, it's old and I don't care why the BiG made the mistake that I think they made. It's a UCONN board, give it a rest.