- Joined
- Apr 25, 2014
- Messages
- 5,292
- Reaction Score
- 19,788
Also, kind of glad he didn't go to Maryland since we play them next year.That is a damn good recruiting class they are bringing in, along with Lee & Lewis. Pitino saying he'll be holding another press conference next week or so to announce another player, too.
Gotta give props to Pitino. He's a heck of a recruiter and isn't all that bad at developing talent once they get there. There have been some players that turned out a lot better than their ranking would dictate. His teams were Kriptonite to us. I sort of miss playing them, but they more often had our number than we had theirs.
I agree about giving props to Pitino. Although he can be criticized for his arrogance and off court extracurriculars, he is a heck of a basketball coach. He recruits great athletes and uses them to play stifling defense. It seems like he is getting tremendous depth on his roster and has had few if any down years in some time.
I would take a proven grad transfer player over a 1 and done player any day.
Evans or Kromah over AD?
You'd pass on Stone for a grad transfer?
I believe that's an unknown. Miller may fit UConn's needs more than Stones who's to know right? You would think this would be simple as Stone is a supposed stud, but does Millers experience lend a hand to making AB better whereas maybe Stone's inexperience may not have? Who knows, I like the one we got.
Imagine the Huskies having a nice looking prospect freshman instead of Kromah because he took that spot? I mean just a kid who projects to be a real nice player in the long haul but only played 4-6 minutes. What we got from Kromah cannot be measured because very few freshman can play 2-3 positions on defense, clog passing lanes, read passes and guard key players. All while shooting in the high 3o's from 3. His experience was a key piece to a NC and I doubt there were many options better for that role. Again, somewhat of a crapshoot but if it's right, it can be better.
Kind of thing you convince yourself of when you can get Winslows Okafors and Townses.
Kind of thing you convince yourself of when you can get Winslows Okafors and Townses.
I wouldn't pass on Stone or any top ten recruit for that matter, but you're just as likely to draw a kid like Turner, or Alexander, or Oubre that don't really move the needle and leave after a year as you are to get a big time difference maker.
With the understanding that I might look like an idiot in eight months, I have no problem saying that I think Miller will be better for us than Stone would have, taking roster context, positional strengths, etc. into account.
If you read what champs and bruce wrote they stated exactly what you are stating about their preferable player. If you think they are rationalizing because he isn't coming to UConn so be it. I didn't get that at all from their statements.This is not a tough one. People who gets paid millions of dollars to coach and recruit players were chasing Stone to the end of the Earth.
Miller is a very good Ivy League player who's game might translate at a higher level for one season in his 5th year.
Do you really think Kevin Ollie would hesitate given a choice?
You guys can literally talk yourselves into anything.
If you read what champs and bruce wrote they stated exactly what you are stating about their preferable player. If you think they are rationalizing because he isn't coming to UConn so be it. I didn't get that at all from their statements.
There is no one in this thread who would take Miller over Stone if they were in the position to chose and that choice was available. However there is no guarantee that this choice would have a better outcome for UConn next season. We've seen over and over again where the preferable choice went elsewhere and plan D helped the team to a championship. Would plan A have accomplished the same result? No one knows.
champs and Bruce are making the assumption that Amidah will improve significantly from last season. That's an unknown. If he does than you have a decent if not very good 4 in Miller and a decent 5 with Amidah as opposed to a potentially incredible 5 in Stone and Amidah a back up 5 with potentially no decent 4. Is that the more likely formula for success with a freshman Adams, jr. Rodney and soph. DHam? Who knows? It isn't illogical to postulate that a postgrad player can make the transition to a new team easier than a freshman no matter how talented that player is. Nor is it illogical to postulate that having five players with skills on the floor is better than four even with one of the four being one of the best, if not the best, player in his class.
I would give anything to zoom to an over verse and observe the two universes being debated. That's the only way to determine which hypothesis is correct. To insist we know outcomes without having the opportunity to test our theories is the problem imo. I don't get the impression champs or Bruce are insisting their statements are incontrovertible.
I would take a proven grad transfer player over a 1 and done player any day.
Not being in a P5 conference doesn't hurt Memphis and UNLV's recruiting.I can't help but wonder what our 2015 class would look like if we were in one of the P5 confs. Not implying our hall for 2015 isn't good, but I'm sure KO and staff have had an uphill battle to get who they have so far and who they might add, not to mention how dominos may have had to fall our way to land Miller. Though maybe we were his top choice.
I wonder what recruits we might have landed if we were in a P5 now. Maybe Stone, Derrick Jones, or Briscoe are a few that come to mind. Maybe none of them would have chose UConn, but I can't help but wonder.
Gotta give props to Pitino. He's a heck of a recruiter and isn't all that bad at developing talent once they get there. There have been some players that turned out a lot better than their ranking would dictate. His teams were Kriptonite to us. I sort of miss playing them, but they more often had our number than we had theirs.