- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 8,884
- Reaction Score
- 37,262
In November 2009, Ms. Reynolds and other members of the academic support program convened a meeting of the football coaches to discuss how the departure of Ms. Crowder would affect the players’ academic standing. The counselors and coaches were “painfully aware,” the report said, “that Crowder’s retirement would require the whole football program to adjust to a new reality of having to meet academic requirements with real academic work.”
Is there going to be any penalty?
Is there going to be any penalty?
I would be shocked if there is any penalty at all. The report definitely finds that the athletic department got the biggest benefit from these classes, but it also references that others could take the classes. I like that the greeks got wind and started filling the classes which worried the professor. The only reason for the NCAA to change their position that this was an "academic" scandal, and not an "athletic" scandal, is if the pressure is just too great to do something.Is there going to be any penalty?
There won't be any punishment for UNC athletics. They're college royalty.
Regardless, the school and its alumni should be ashamed. If you have to defend yourself by saying "our athletics program wasn't the problem here, it was our entire academic system!" then you're really in some .
I would be shocked if there is any penalty at all. The report definitely finds that the athletic department got the biggest benefit from these classes, but it also references that others could take the classes. I like that the greeks got wind and started filling the classes which worried the professor. The only reason for the NCAA to change their position that this was an "academic" scandal, and not an "athletic" scandal, is if the pressure is just too great to do something.
Is there going to be any penalty?
Whatever the NCAA does they will do it grudgingly because they don't really want to punish a blue blood.I think there's going to be a penalty. I don't think the academic/athletic distinction the NCAA originally tried to make is going to be tenable and I think the report is too damning for the NCAA to avoid some sort of sanction.
The details in the report are pretty incredible - emails from the academic counselor to the women's basketball team requesting specific grades, papers (which were the only requirement) consisting of intros and conclusions with only long quotations in between, a ton of plagiarism, the football team power point, the whole thing being run by a non-professor administrator who didn't do anything other than skim the beginnings and ends of papers and then hand out A's and B's, evidence of a significant impact of the grades from these courses on keeping basketball and football players above a 2.0....A lot of people tried to keep plausible deniability but the more you digest the report, the less that's credible.
There was very clearly a structured effort at UNC for over a decade to get struggling athletes into fake - not easy, fake - classes so that they could stay eligible. I think the NCAA is going to be forced to do something.
There is no wiggle room here.
If Memphis had to return their final four because of Derrick Rose, North Carolina has to give back the 2005 title.
What I find interesting, is that even though non-athletes could take the course, obviously athletes in trouble academically were steered towards these classes. Was this done by someone in the athletic department? If so, then the athletic department should be held accountable. I like how the article mentions how "after a year or two" Roy Williams didn't want his players taking these classes. What did he do about it? What was done to keep his players from taking those classes? So many unanswered questions.
While there may be reasons for penalties to be thrown UNC's way, I, like most here, think nothing will happen. If anything, Emmert will probably make sure UConn takes the rap.