- Joined
- Aug 4, 2014
- Messages
- 1,412
- Reaction Score
- 6,516
appears to be on the improve. While the AAC is not in the same galaxy as the top conferences, and I would still kill to see UConn get the heck out and into a P5 where it rightfully belongs, the early results from some AAC schools are encouraging and might suggest the level of play is getting better. One can only hope.
For example:
- Houston is only 1-3, but barely lost 82-78 to #23 ranked George Washington.
- USF is 3-1, ranked #18, and only lost to #5Baylor @Baylor, 66-63.
- SMU is 1-2, but lost to #18 ranked ASU by only 7 pts., 64-57.
- Temple is 2-2, lost to an ok Florida team, 97-91 (which then beat #6 FSU, w/ Romero), then gave a good Rutgers team a game, losing in Piscataway, 61-51.
- Tulane, 3-2, lost 78-72 to highly ranked FSU (no Romero) in Tallahassee.
- Tulsa, 1-3, beat a rebuilding Arkansas, 74-67 (which went to 2nd round NCAA), lost to K-State by 8.
It was expected that USF would do very well, but it appears several AAC teams have their programs moving in the right direction. Losing will always stink, but for teams that have long struggled, I believe there are such things as 'moral victories'- competing well, though losing, is meaningful for them.
Last year, nobody could have imagined any AAC team not named UConn or USF competing with, let alone actually beating, even the lousiest SEC team. Or any ranked team, for that matter. And while I know it can be precarious using the transitive property to make one's argument, the improvement many AAC teams have made is undeniable. A long journey begins with a small step. Good for them.
For example:
- Houston is only 1-3, but barely lost 82-78 to #23 ranked George Washington.
- USF is 3-1, ranked #18, and only lost to #5Baylor @Baylor, 66-63.
- SMU is 1-2, but lost to #18 ranked ASU by only 7 pts., 64-57.
- Temple is 2-2, lost to an ok Florida team, 97-91 (which then beat #6 FSU, w/ Romero), then gave a good Rutgers team a game, losing in Piscataway, 61-51.
- Tulane, 3-2, lost 78-72 to highly ranked FSU (no Romero) in Tallahassee.
- Tulsa, 1-3, beat a rebuilding Arkansas, 74-67 (which went to 2nd round NCAA), lost to K-State by 8.
It was expected that USF would do very well, but it appears several AAC teams have their programs moving in the right direction. Losing will always stink, but for teams that have long struggled, I believe there are such things as 'moral victories'- competing well, though losing, is meaningful for them.
Last year, nobody could have imagined any AAC team not named UConn or USF competing with, let alone actually beating, even the lousiest SEC team. Or any ranked team, for that matter. And while I know it can be precarious using the transitive property to make one's argument, the improvement many AAC teams have made is undeniable. A long journey begins with a small step. Good for them.