epark88
Throat's all better now, thanks for asking...
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,283
- Reaction Score
- 1,392
...then I believe new Big East may have a fighting chance.
Yes big markets are important and are a driving force behind realignment, but the very essence of college football still lies in the intense, bitter rivalries between schools and teams. With both of those in mind, the proposed additions could produce:
* TCU-SMU. The Iron Skillet, every year in the Metroplex. No it's not the RRR, but at least it would register locally to start, then nationally in a few years' time.
* USF-UCF. These schools truly despise each other, from the top down. The 'War on I-4' has a ton of potential to draw heat from the Tampa and Orlando markets.
* Temple-Nova. This one - for the Mayor's Cup - would be a couple of years down the line as Nova still needs to upgrade, but both teams in a BCS league together could possibly get folks in 'Philly talking about CFB regularly. They'd need to work at it, though.
* Cincy-UofL-Memphis. I know: ewww. But the Tigers have long-standing rivalries with both Cincy and UofL and would immediately garner local attention in those cities if they were brought in. But Memphis FB has fallen off so badly as of late, it would be a tough sell. So if it doesn't fly, then the Keg of Nails can continue and would do just fine.
* WVU-ECU. A rival for the 'Eers is a toughie. The obvious one - the 'Coal Bowl' with Marshall - is unfortunately a non-starter because the Herd's school is substandard for the Big East, even in the league's current state. The Pirates would provide a bit of juice here, but if they're a no-go then WVU can pick up where they left off with UofL.
And then there's...
* UConn-Rutgers. I despise Exit 9, and I'm sure their fans can't stand our Huskies - a natural rivalry if ever there were one. If it can't happen in the ACC then it might as well happen in an okay league with a few other nice rivalries, right?...
Yes big markets are important and are a driving force behind realignment, but the very essence of college football still lies in the intense, bitter rivalries between schools and teams. With both of those in mind, the proposed additions could produce:
* TCU-SMU. The Iron Skillet, every year in the Metroplex. No it's not the RRR, but at least it would register locally to start, then nationally in a few years' time.
* USF-UCF. These schools truly despise each other, from the top down. The 'War on I-4' has a ton of potential to draw heat from the Tampa and Orlando markets.
* Temple-Nova. This one - for the Mayor's Cup - would be a couple of years down the line as Nova still needs to upgrade, but both teams in a BCS league together could possibly get folks in 'Philly talking about CFB regularly. They'd need to work at it, though.
* Cincy-UofL-Memphis. I know: ewww. But the Tigers have long-standing rivalries with both Cincy and UofL and would immediately garner local attention in those cities if they were brought in. But Memphis FB has fallen off so badly as of late, it would be a tough sell. So if it doesn't fly, then the Keg of Nails can continue and would do just fine.
* WVU-ECU. A rival for the 'Eers is a toughie. The obvious one - the 'Coal Bowl' with Marshall - is unfortunately a non-starter because the Herd's school is substandard for the Big East, even in the league's current state. The Pirates would provide a bit of juice here, but if they're a no-go then WVU can pick up where they left off with UofL.
And then there's...
* UConn-Rutgers. I despise Exit 9, and I'm sure their fans can't stand our Huskies - a natural rivalry if ever there were one. If it can't happen in the ACC then it might as well happen in an okay league with a few other nice rivalries, right?...