Quite frankly, riding back on the train my friend told me just to enjoy the journey. You win and move on. I was complaining about no rim protection - why Amida wasn't in the game - and how his plus/minus must have been pretty good? Admittedly I don't know the number - does anyone?
and everyone else that walked through that door
I am sure they all love you back as well. Raining here is Atlanta but it feels sunny for some reason.
I even love AO this morning
What hurt us down the stretch is that there was a few minute period where we got caught up in the frenetic pace that they love. This scared me going in (I posted a few days back that I could see us having an eighteen point lead with eight minutes left and getting careless, watching it melt to a four point lead with three minutes left. My son asked me last night if I was psychic) and we did for a brief time fall into that trap.
Actually I disagree. We started taking the air out of the ball once we went up 17. So our offense started to get a bit stagnant with guys standing around as we ran clock. This carried over to our defense as seemed less active especially on the boards and with loose balls. ISU started playing with a sense of urgency and we were looking to hold on. It obviously was effective; survive and advance and all of that, but I have always hated (even w/ JC) how we close out games. People forget that we had a big lead over Clemson that we squandered when Tate hit the shot. I will never forget that and cannot tell you how p!ssed I was while watching it. Something similar happened in 1994 against Florida. Same thing against GTech in 04. I don't see that as similar as the melting of the lead started far too late in the game and all it could have done (which is what it did) was make the final score look a bit more respectable. I will agrree that we did call off the dogs quite early in that game and I was a bit bummed that we didn't beat them by 40 (which we could have). We were up 20 and got passive and let them make it interesting.