Do not look at the Big East's record | Page 5 | The Boneyard

Do not look at the Big East's record

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,844
Reaction Score
15,384
What UConn fans am I driving away? You are just a miserable turd and your shtick is beyond old, Fishy at least makes his misery posts funny. Happy Thanksgiving!
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,376
Reaction Score
68,269
What UConn fans am I driving away? You are just a miserable turd and your shtick is beyond old, Fishy at least makes his misery posts funny. Happy Thanksgiving!

Well you told me to go follow a Big East team - so I guess quite specifically it would be me.

I don't have a 'shtick' nor am I miserable that the Big East is a better league than the AAC. I actually can deal with that fact and don't need to pretend the opposite is true.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
7,302
Reaction Score
23,617
I actually can deal with that fact and don't need to pretend the opposite is true.

That's because you are better than the rest of us Mr Whaler, you are so smart and we are so dumb and childish.

Please tell us more facts that we can't handle on this Thanksgiving day. Please remind us why we should be unhappy.......

...and thank you for trying to help us see the dark.
 
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
2,442
Reaction Score
9,471
Who said they were meaningless?

I am saying that the RPI and SOS should have given them more credit, but the general consensus (which was wrong) was biased against the conference. Same with the AAC teams. Kentucky was around 20 RPI. Not 36-40.
There is so much information available now about the committee's selection and seeding process. Not sure why you think RPI is some main driver. It's one of many computer rankings they are given, and all those rankings are one small piece of the puzzle. It's also been stated many, many times by various committee members over many different years that they don't even look at what conference teams are in.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,486
Reaction Score
96,151
That's because you are better than the rest of us Mr Whaler, you are so smart and we are so dumb and childish.

Please tell us more facts that we can't handle on this Thanksgiving day. Please remind us why we should be unhappy..

...and thank you for trying to help us see the dark.

If anyone saw the Saturday Night Live Thanksgiving skit on "Debbie Downer" last night that's whaler11 on everything. Always a negative thought involved in his processing.

Having said that what the Big East has done thus far has been pretty impressive, actually really impressive. They've beaten many solid teams on the way and yesterday was icing on the cake with wins over UNC, Florida and Minny. No denying they are going to have a solid year because they are deep. Will the get a NC out of there - NO!
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
43,953
Reaction Score
32,129
I really miss days like yesterday, when the basketball schools would knock off 3 major conference teams and we would know that in addition to Louisville, Syracuse and Pitt, we would have great games against Georgetown, Villanova and whoever to look forward to in January and February. 2010-2011 was my favorite season not just because of UConn's March run, but because almost every conference game was a huge matchup going in. I absolutely loved that.

It feels like our schedule ends after the Stanford game this year. It just makes me sad to have almost no games to look forward to in the conference schedule, and that is not going to change as long as we are in this southern midmajor wasteland of a league..
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,029
Reaction Score
23,088
The Big East is a heck of a conference and I think people are starting to find out again that the Big East is not going away as easy as they once thought. The narrative may be that the Big East is dead and ESPN even formally declared it dead on its "Requiem for the Big East" documentary a year ago but now they must be really puzzled because they spent a lot of the broadcasting airtime today as they will do tomorrow (Okla-Butler, Gtown-Wisc) displaying Big East teams on their best. Basically giving airtime to a rival conference that is property of Fox Sports 1. The league looks as alive as ever before. They are killing the competition right now (including other top tier leagues) and its pretty darn fun to watch

The AAC as a league? not so much. Connecticut will be fine at the end of the day. Connecticut is Connecticut and I don't think it matter what conference it plays on to win championship but from an attendance/hype perspective is much better to belong to a great league than a crappy one. So far the AAC is not even in the top-10 RPI conference. I know its a bit too early to take the RPI too serious, but the signs are there and the AAC has to start winning some games quickly before the loses pile up
They've done well EARLY this year. Last year they had Nova who was overhyped and dispatched by us. I don't think you can say that the big east is going to be a powerhouse for years to come. The AAC starts from further behind except for us and as a league it's going to be all about the recruits and talent, and that's where it happens. Can new AAC teams get better players than St. John's and Marquette? I think they can.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
782
Reaction Score
756
when JC guides sled team to A-10, sign meesa up for seasons tickets

if this dont happen; southern wasteland conf will nuke UCONN across the board with an unprecedented revenue drop
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,376
Reaction Score
68,269
Please tell us more facts that we can't handle on this Thanksgiving day. Please remind us why we should be unhappy..

.

Maybe that's our problem Mets. You seem to think it should make someone unhappy - I don't care that the Big East is better beyond I like college basketball and the sport interests me.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
4,393
Reaction Score
12,751
Th Big East is gonna continue to be a good mid-major ... but that doesn't change the fact that it's still a mid-major.

Not having UConn, Syracuse, Louisville and Pitt in the same conference is a blow that will do damage for the foreseeable future. There really aren't any big draws left in the Big East.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
43,953
Reaction Score
32,129
Th Big East is gonna continue to be a good mid-major ... but that doesn't change the fact that it's still a mid-major.

Not having UConn, Syracuse, Louisville and Pitt in the same conference is a blow that will do damage for the foreseeable future. There really aren't any big draws left in the Big East.

The difference between midmajors and majors is network support and money. The big east has both and we have neither.
 

CTBasketball

Former Owner of the Pizza Thread
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
9,670
Reaction Score
31,233
I love the UConn fans who want to chase off other UConn fans. You guys are the best.

Because if you realize the Big East is a better basketball conference than the AAC, UConn doesn't need you.

Solid strategy.
Now Whaler you're usually a good poster, whether its on here or on the football board. But some of your football buddies do this to outsiders way too much.

But I agree with your Big East stance.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
4,393
Reaction Score
12,751
The difference between midmajors and majors is network support and money. The big east has both and we have neither.
For now. Seeing as how their ratings are even worse than the AAC's, you better believe they won't get such a sweet deal the next time around.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,486
Reaction Score
96,151
It's funny how ignorant we can be as fans sometimes. This is a basketball board and if it weren't for football, we'd be in the Big East. The problem is because of football being so awful we are in the AAC and will remain there for a long time unless our football brothers decide to leave the dream behind in which then we can go back to the Big East.

I mean can anyone here - as BASKETBALL fans - say they'd rather be in a conference with SMU, Houston, Tulsa, East Carolina, UCF, USF, Cincy, Tulane and Memphis. This instead of Villanova, GTown, PC, St Johns, Creighton, Butler, Xavier, Marquette and DePaul ??....Now remember adding us would make all of those teams look and recruit better.

We are where we are and have to live with it, but as a basketball fan of UConn I'd gladly take back that "mid-major" league or so you call it, in a nano second!
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,143
Reaction Score
45,560
The version of the AAC that we saw last year included Louisville and did not include ECU, Tulsa, and Tulane, so that obviously distorts the picture a bit. And really, if you're going to compare the two apples-to-apples, you have to eliminate UConn, too (again, this is in a different universe where UConn is choosing between leagues). Minus UConn and Louisville, it was a two bid league.

It might be still November, but the OOC schedule is already half over, so at this point we already have a pretty good idea of which conferences are strong and which aren't. The Big East is closer to #1 and the AAC is closer to #10, and looking at recruiting, I'm not so sure that's going to change anytime soon.

UConn team took on Villanova and beat them. A team like Memphis would have profited from the absence of UConn (3 losses) which is why you can't eliminate UConn from the comparison. Eliminate Louisville and the teams have better records as well. How much RPI is lost by eliminating 3 games against UConn? Memphis gains 3 in the win column by that simple move.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,143
Reaction Score
45,560
There is so much information available now about the committee's selection and seeding process. Not sure why you think RPI is some main driver. It's one of many computer rankings they are given, and all those rankings are one small piece of the puzzle. It's also been stated many, many times by various committee members over many different years that they don't even look at what conference teams are in.

Sigh.

I do not like RPI.

I'm not the one bringing it up.

The other posters are.

They are talking about a needed measurement to compare 300 teams.

Whatever measures the committee used, the teams from the AAC received poorer seeds than the RPI dictated, AND then (this is the most important factor) they outperformed their seeds. The BE did the reverse of that. They were given cushy seeds, and they FLOPPED.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,143
Reaction Score
45,560
The difference between midmajors and majors is network support and money. The big east has both and we have neither.

The big boys are making $25m a year+

The BE teams makes $1.9m more than most of the AAC (not UConn, because for 5 years or so UConn has exit fees and NCAA credits coming).

The difference between $25m+ and $2m is great. The difference between $3.9m and $2m is not.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,143
Reaction Score
45,560
It's funny how ignorant we can be as fans sometimes. This is a basketball board and if it weren't for football, we'd be in the Big East. The problem is because of football being so awful we are in the AAC and will remain there for a long time unless our football brothers decide to leave the dream behind in which then we can go back to the Big East.

I mean can anyone here - as BASKETBALL fans - say they'd rather be in a conference with SMU, Houston, Tulsa, East Carolina, UCF, USF, Cincy, Tulane and Memphis. This instead of Villanova, GTown, PC, St Johns, Creighton, Butler, Xavier, Marquette and DePaul ??....Now remember adding us would make all of those teams look and recruit better.

We are where we are and have to live with it, but as a basketball fan of UConn I'd gladly take back that "mid-major" league or so you call it, in a nano second!

You're leaving out the major factor. Getting the hell out of mid-majordom eventually. Because if you can't do that, the future is going to be grim no matter what mid-major conference you're in.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Messages
1,361
Reaction Score
2,630
As I stated above, the top half of the AAC was better than the top half of the NBE last year. The NBE was a better conference top to bottom (not wildly better) because the the bottom half of the NBE was substantially better than the bottom half of the AAC (which was bad). The NBE is currently 4th in RPI, even with last night's wins. They probably end up 4th. They ended up 4th last year. The AAC ended up 8th last year. The AAC will likely end up 8th this year. However, having ESPN force feed AAC games year in and year out will help many of its teams improve over time. Big wins will help the NBE, but if no one is watching, it may not make much of a difference. Very few people remember what you do two weeks into the season. We'll see how it all plays out. The bottom line is UConn is where it is because it's thinking long term. It's already proven that playing in one mid-major conference versus another isn't going to keep it from winning a national championship.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,782
Reaction Score
13,336
For now. Seeing as how their ratings are even worse than the AAC's, you better believe they won't get such a sweet deal the next time around.

Exactly.

The NBE walked into the upstart Fox Sports offices at the exact right time. It's not that Fox saw great ratings with the NBE, they needed something to fill up their prime airtime and threw huge bucks at the NBE.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Messages
1,361
Reaction Score
2,630
The big boys are making $25m a year+

The BE teams makes $1.9m more than most of the AAC (not UConn, because for 5 years or so UConn has exit fees and NCAA credits coming).

The difference between $25m+ and $2m is great. The difference between $3.9m and $2m is not.

Additionally, the AAC renegotiates their deal in 2019 while NBE is locked into their version of minimum wage until 2026. There is no big money edge in being in NBE. It's a fallacy.
 
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
2,442
Reaction Score
9,471
Sigh.

I do not like RPI.

I'm not the one bringing it up.

The other posters are.

They are talking about a needed measurement to compare 300 teams.

Whatever measures the committee used, the teams from the AAC received poorer seeds than the RPI dictated, AND then (this is the most important factor) they outperformed their seeds. The BE did the reverse of that. They were given cushy seeds, and they FLOPPED.
I don't know how your level of idiocy still surprises me at this point, but somehow it does. You state in your post that Kentucky should have been given more credit for their RPI and SOS. Then you state that you're not bringing up RPI, I guess because some other poster brought it up first, as if that's relevent. Just painful.
 

Stainmaster

Occasionally Constructive
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
22,005
Reaction Score
41,503
It's funny how ignorant we can be as fans sometimes. This is a basketball board and if it weren't for football, we'd be in the Big East. The problem is because of football being so awful we are in the AAC and will remain there for a long time unless our football brothers decide to leave the dream behind in which then we can go back to the Big East.

I mean can anyone here - as BASKETBALL fans - say they'd rather be in a conference with SMU, Houston, Tulsa, East Carolina, UCF, USF, Cincy, Tulane and Memphis. This instead of Villanova, GTown, PC, St Johns, Creighton, Butler, Xavier, Marquette and DePaul ??....Now remember adding us would make all of those teams look and recruit better.

We are where we are and have to live with it, but as a basketball fan of UConn I'd gladly take back that "mid-major" league or so you call it, in a nano second!

So you're cool with being stuck in the Big East when the P5 reduces the rest of college athletics to a smoldering crater? I'd much rather take the risk with football. It's literally our only shot at survival.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
43,953
Reaction Score
32,129
So you're cool with being stuck in the Big East when the P5 reduces the rest of college athletics to a smoldering crater? I'd much rather take the risk with football. It's literally our only shot at survival.

I like the Big East's chances of being on the right side of history a lot better than I like the AAC's. With the exception of Cleveland and Pittsburgh, they have a school within 50 miles of every major city between Boston, Chicago and DC, and in most cases they are the only team in that market. Almost every program has been to a Final Four in the modern era, and most of them draw well. If the P5 tries to kill the Big East, they could kill the sport of college basketball. The AAC could go away tomorrow and no one would miss it.
 

Stainmaster

Occasionally Constructive
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
22,005
Reaction Score
41,503
I like the Big East's chances of being on the right side of history a lot better than I like the AAC's. With the exception of Cleveland and Pittsburgh, they have a school within 50 miles of every major city between Boston, Chicago and DC, and in most cases they are the only team in that market. Almost every program has been to a Final Four in the modern era, and most of them draw well. If the P5 tries to kill the Big East, they could kill the sport of college basketball. The AAC could go away tomorrow and no one would miss it.

The AAC is not a long-term option. It is a stepping stone to P5. UCONN is not getting an invite there to the P5 if their football is in the MAC, independent, or FCS. If this bothers you, tough cookies. You'll be thankful after the Big East is actually dead (which I'm not looking forward to, I'll miss the league plenty).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
564
Guests online
3,470
Total visitors
4,034

Forum statistics

Threads
155,765
Messages
4,030,816
Members
9,863
Latest member
leepaul


Top Bottom