Defensive Line | The Boneyard

Defensive Line

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
7,302
Reaction Score
23,617
Looking at the roster this may be the thinnest part of the team. I know we only need to fill three positions but we don't seem to have much depth here.

Anybody know who the expected starters are and who may surprise? My Guess is we line up with Pruitt, Campenni and Mcbryde with Myers, Fatukasi and Adeyemi as the primary backups, which isn't much of a guess since this pretty much accounts for everybody available (doubtful the true freshman will play).

Will the lack of depth here and lack of 3-4 experience force Diaco into a more traditional 4-3 line-up to take the pressure off of them? Adeyemi, Marinan and Lawley aren't really big enough to be 3-4 ends.

I'm a little surprised Ormsby isn't a defensive lineman as he seemed to have the frame to bulk up, but maybe that switch will take place in the future.

Is James Atkins a scholarship player or walk-on?
upload_2014-7-27_12-9-45.png
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,742
Reaction Score
7,524
Atkins is a scholly player from mass i believe.

I think Myers will start (not sure over who), but otherwise i agree with your lineup.

We are definitely thin at the positions, but i have to think we will see changes as time goes on.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2012
Messages
1,130
Reaction Score
2,067
I think we have 4 formidable guys that can play the 3-4 scheme well with Pruitt, McBryde, Campenni, and Myers. There is a lot of experience amongst them so I trust those guys to get it done. They will need some more depth as the season goes on. Hopefully Fatukasi can step up, he has the size Diaco wants for the 3-4. I wouldn't be surprised to see Rueben Frank or Cole Ormsby spell at the DE spots during passing downs when they don't need the girth to stop the run game. Still looking for Adeyemi to put it all together.
 
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
2,472
Reaction Score
4,896
I think we have 4 formidable guys that can play the 3-4 scheme well with Pruitt, McBryde, Campenni, and Myers. There is a lot of experience amongst them so I trust those guys to get it done. They will need some more depth as the season goes on. Hopefully Fatukasi can step up, he has the size Diaco wants for the 3-4. I wouldn't be surprised to see Rueben Frank or Cole Ormsby spell at the DE spots during passing downs when they don't need the girth to stop the run game. Still looking for Adeyemi to put it all together.
Yep, We have to be able to stop the run. Notre Dame fans tell us we are going to have to get used to hearing the saying, (about the defense) It bends but doesn't break.
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,376
Reaction Score
68,269
I agree that DLine is the most concerning position. Successful defenses need 5-6 guys to contribute.
 

SubbaBub

Your stupidity is ruining my country.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,093
Reaction Score
24,542
Is Kenton at 268 a typo? Other than that they look good from a size standpoint. In the 3-4 they need to clog the middle. It's at LB where we look awfully small.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2011
Messages
482
Reaction Score
1,130
Staying healthy is going to be VERY important on the DLine. Looking towards the future I hope they are considering looking at JUCO's this year for the class of 15.

The roster has been updated but I don't believe the weights have changed. Adeyemi was the same exact size last year. I assume he's added weight in the new lifting/diet program.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
4,606
Reaction Score
6,998
Staying healthy is going to be VERY important on the DLine. Looking towards the future I hope they are considering looking at JUCO's this year for the class of 15.

The roster has been updated but I don't believe the weights have changed. Adeyemi was the same exact size last year. I assume he's added weight in the new lifting/diet program.


In a way that statement contradicts itself. Dieting (losing weight), lifting presumably gaining weight. I think he could remain the same weight, but add muscle and strength in its place.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
35,132
Reaction Score
29,316
I agree that DLine is the most concerning position. Successful defenses need 5-6 guys to contribute.
I think the OLine is much thinner talent-wise. And numbers too. We have decent Dline guys, that if healthy, will be a plus for us. The rush will need to come from the linebackers.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
4,606
Reaction Score
6,998
I think the OLine is much thinner talent-wise. And numbers too. We have decent Dline guys, that if healthy, will be a plus for us. The rush will need to come from the linebackers.
Isn't that the point/strength of a 3-4 defense?
 
Last edited:

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,376
Reaction Score
68,269
I think the OLine is much thinner talent-wise. And numbers too. We have decent Dline guys, that if healthy, will be a plus for us. The rush will need to come from the linebackers.

It's a bit of a tossup. The OL has a bunch of questions but barring injuries if you land on a decent line you don't need to worry about depth.

I don't see how the DL ends up being a plus relative to competition - but I also can't see how the OL ends up a net positive either.

It's an odd UConn team that has it's relative strengths at positions other than the front 7 on defense.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
4,606
Reaction Score
6,998
It's a bit of a tossup. The OL has a bunch of questions but barring injuries if you land on a decent line you don't need to worry about depth.

I don't see how the DL ends up being a plus relative to competition - but I also can't see how the OL ends up a net positive either.

It's an odd UConn team that has it's relative strengths at positions other than the front 7 on defense.

First the first time in a number of years that I can think of the defense isn't the solid known commodity coming into the season.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,788
Reaction Score
10,064
uconnfan68 said:
I think the OLine is much thinner talent-wise. And numbers too. We have decent Dline guys, that if healthy, will be a plus for us. The rush will need to come from the linebackers.

Our offensive line without question is our weakest spot. At this point no one on that unit has proven to be even average. Next would be linebackers.

I am comfortable with the d line rotation if it will basically be a 3-4. Would like to see 5 contribute, but I think Campenni, Myers, Pruitt, and McBride can be solid.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
3,922
Reaction Score
7,773
Pruitt, Campenni, and McBryde should be starters, with Myers and Fatukasi rotating in. Move Pruitt inside and Ormsby or Frank move in for a 4 man line.
 

Uconnalliance

Please cancel the program all hope is lost
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
2,385
Reaction Score
2,930
Hope all these boys are ready to go Aug 29th ,read recently BYU has 2 1000 yd rushers between QB and RB.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
26,914
Reaction Score
65,039
Is Kenton at 268 a typo? Other than that they look good from a size standpoint. In the 3-4 they need to clog the middle. It's at LB where we look awfully small.

That's not small for a DE which I believe he is slated to play.

BTW, I talked to Kenton's dad at the spring game and he said that his son had gone over 300 pounds last year and the new S&C coach had gotten him down go to 290.

So who knows?
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
8,668
Reaction Score
15,329
Good news on Kenton. We need him at the 290 range to play up front in the 3-4
 

SubbaBub

Your stupidity is ruining my country.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,093
Reaction Score
24,542
Palatine said:
That's not small for a DE which I believe he is slated to play.

BTW, I talked to Kenton's dad at the spring game and he said that his son had gone over 300 pounds last year and the new S&C coach had gotten him down go to 290.

So who knows?

A 4-3 DE maybe, I'm not up on my 3-4 schemes, but I was under the impression that in the preferred scheme the DE's were beefier and the NT something just shy of a mountain range. It could be he'd play the weak side end.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
26,914
Reaction Score
65,039
A 4-3 DE maybe, I'm not up on my 3-4 schemes, but I was under the impression that in the preferred scheme the DE's were beefier and the NT something just shy of a mountain range. It could be he'd play the weak side end.
The NY Jets play a 3-4 and the DE's they have in camp are 272, 248, 289, 280, 265. That's an NFL team which you would expect to be larger than a college team.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2011
Messages
482
Reaction Score
1,130
In a way that statement contradicts itself. Dieting (losing weight), lifting presumably gaining weight. I think he could remain the same weight, but add muscle and strength in its place.

You do know that diet doesn't equal weight loss correct? Diet = what you eat. It could be a diet for weight loss, weight gain, healthy, unhealthy, strength, energy, etc.

Diaco talked about adding weight to the linemen when he arrived. So I think it's a safe assumption that the kid would be on a weight/strength gaining diet.
 
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
225
Reaction Score
424
Our offensive line without question is our weakest spot. At this point no one on that unit has proven to be even average. Next would be linebackers.

I am comfortable with the d line rotation if it will basically be a 3-4. Would like to see 5 contribute, but I think Campenni, Myers, Pruitt, and McBride can be solid.
agree with everything you said. Julian Myers Pru and McBride have the potential to hold us down on the d-line. Our depth at linebacker should help out as well. I'd be more worried about the o-line and protecting whoever starts at qb. o-line has been our biggest problem of late but with Foley back coaching the position, there is hope. George set things back a bit to say the least. I know Foley was moved back to the line when pauly was canned but now with a full offseason of coaching the position again and implementing his blocking schemes, we should see a slight improvement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
332
Guests online
2,820
Total visitors
3,152

Forum statistics

Threads
155,757
Messages
4,030,500
Members
9,864
Latest member
leepaul


Top Bottom