- Joined
- Apr 16, 2014
- Messages
- 548
- Reaction Score
- 3,173
The team just experienced a huge jump in competition from Furman to playing Michigan, Syracuse and Gonzaga with 2 new players in the starting lineup. The wrinkles will be worked out.
This pretty much sums it up. We have seen how much disrespect the AAC has gotten on Selection Sunday so thats why these games early in the season like this are under the microscope a lot more than they were when we played in the BETrue, but the problem with our conference and schedule which has been said as nauseum is that we simply don't have the leeway or margin of error that P5 schools have to "iron out the wrinkles". This isn't the big east anymore, we don't have the liberty of playing sloppy the first 2 months of the season only to turn it on later. The Battle for Atlantis currently dropped this teams ceiling from a 2 seed to around a 4/5 seed in a matter of 24 hours. This is why people are worried.
Exactly too much over reaction on too bad games for us(especially the Gonzaga game. We can still gel but KO needs to shorten his bench and give JA more time at the point and have SE develop behind AB. I have lost hope for PN.While I agree this is not the start we wanted...we beat Maryland in 11 days and everything changes.
CincinnatiI too would love to grab a couple OOC wins so we don't have to be nail biting at the end of the year, but who is going to compete with us during the AAC Championship with SMU out? Tulsa?
Beating Maryland would be great, but if we win the AAC regular season and tournament we're going to get a good seed.
I agree with you there.What else was he going to say?
And as of now we don't either. Really only Maryland left. Gtown and Texas can end up being great teams but they've dropped the ball early and lost any potential respect from the committee.SMU had no good wins out of league last year.
SMU had no good wins out of league last year.
I think by March this team will be able to beat anyone on any given night.
The problem is the path to a championship as a 7 seed like in 2014 is so much harder than the path as a 3 or 4 seed, and to be a 3 or 4 seed we'd need a gaudy OOC record.
What games do you see pulling our resume up to "elite". You can't just look at UConn's season through binoculars and ignore the competition. The elite teams nationally all have top ranked conference opponents which will give them top ranked resumes when the selection committee sits down to make seeding. UConn on the other hand has their tough opponents early in the season(who still despite all our scheduling prowess is still weak overall when compared to other overall schedules) with little opportunity to make up for it throughout the season. After Maryland, I'd estimate that UConn has roughly 3, MAYBE 4 ranked games left on the schedule, with those likely being 10-20 range rather than top 10 teams you'd see in a P5 schedule.The idea that this team's "ceiling" has been established as a 5 seed at this point in the season is ridiculous. If they're sitting at 29-2 in March they're getting a 5 seed? C'mon, people, do better.