An Impossible Challenge from the 2nd tier in Waco | Page 2 | The Boneyard

An Impossible Challenge from the 2nd tier in Waco

Status
Not open for further replies.

CocoHusky

1,000,001 BY points
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
17,208
Reaction Score
73,885
The game has changed dramatically since Lobo played same is true of Sales and Bascom. Yet I doubt any Uconn fan can argue with Sue Bird, Swin Cash, Asyia Jones (?), Tamika William, DT except for lacking in size (compared to Wolters, Lobo, Stef, Stewie, ) they were, as a team, exceptional and made the game of Women's Basketball look faster, more accurate, and yes thrilling than many of the Men's games then. But for pure heart warming thrill --watch Jefferson on the fly she just proves the different level of play.
That is an excellent point we are talking about selecting players that span ~25 years-during which time the game has change drastically.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
11,335
Reaction Score
25,045
s
Starters: Lorin Dixon, Sue Bird, DT, Maya Moore, Stewie
Sub: Moriah Jefferson, Tina Charles, Dolson
Sorry to argue----Lorin Dixon isn't one a coach would be subbing Jefferson IN for ---Dixon has a couple of good games as a Senior true. No argument with the other 4 --just replace Dixon with Jefferson and sub in Rene M
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
11,335
Reaction Score
25,045
That is an excellent point we are talking about selecting players that span ~25 years-during which time the game has change drastically.
Thank you --in my bumbling way I do stumble over some decent points--I know I'm not in the class of 90 percent or more of you that deal in stats and data.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
11,335
Reaction Score
25,045
Starting 5 are easy.
1 Bird
2 Taurasi
3 Moore
4 Stewart
5 Charles

After that it gets difficult.
I'd probably go with
G - Jefferson
F - Abrosimova (tough choice with KML. But Abrosimova gives you more height, and you have Bird, DT, Moore, Jefferson, Abrosimova as 3 pt threats)
F/P - Lobo
My all time favorite Uconn Husky is Sue Bird-- talented, aggressive, and a leader. I say this with the kindest of intentions--at equal times in their careers Jefferson is much faster, makes excellent decision (so did Sue), and does things with the Basketball Sue never thought of doing. Jefferson's --drive, hesitate, pull back then attack move is pure Mo Jefferson and effective. Sorry Sue I hope you let me to still love U. Jefferson would be my starter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Wally East

Posting via the Speed Force
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
1,467
Reaction Score
3,680
Would someone care to enumerate the ways the game has changed? Perhaps with specific examples?
 

UcMiami

How it is
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
14,101
Reaction Score
46,584
Yes the game has changed but Sveta was still an Olympian and WNBA star until quite recently, and Sales was playing in the WNBA with the 2002 class and is still unchallenged as the steals leader at Uconn. Shea would have fit right in as well if her knees had not disintegrated.
Wolters would have a hard time keeping up with the road-runners on this team, But so would Dolson for example, but as both a defensive presence and as a low post offensive threat - watch out. William's is easily the career leader in FG percentage but she averaged only 10.6 ppg for her career and never scored more than the 13.5 she averaged as a freshman. Wolters scored almost twice as many points in her career and is #2 in career shooting percentage - #2 in career blocks, and #7 in rebounds.

Lobo - probably a speed issue as well though not as pronounced as Wolters - but she could is the career leader in blocks, one of only two players in Uconn history to average over 10 rebounds a game, and is number 4 in scoring average for her career. Stewart by the way has a chance to set a new record for blocks, but will be no where near Lobo in average blocks per game. (nor likely Wolters either.)
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
297
Reaction Score
774
Bird, DT, Tina Charles, Maya, Stewie..............KML, Lobo, Tiffany Hayes
 

UcMiami

How it is
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
14,101
Reaction Score
46,584
Would someone care to enumerate the ways the game has changed? Perhaps with specific examples?
Speed and athleticism of both the players and the game as well. But in reality not that much - what has really changed is that there are more highly skilled highly athletic players than 20 years ago. Lobo would still be a Stewart like player but probably with less floor game because no one thought to teach someone that tall guard skills. Tina would make Kara look slow, but then she would make Dolson look slow too.
 

RockyMTblue2

Don't Look Up!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
21,964
Reaction Score
96,480
I'll double down on the Sue Bird, Diana Taurasi, Maya Moore, Breanna Stewart, Tina Charles starting five. My bench is different, though - Kerry Bascom, Nykesha Sales, and Moriah Jefferson. I love Rebecca to pieces but she's not athletic enough.

You are light a big - sorry Kerry, the purple haired big girl comes in .....
 

meyers7

You Talkin’ To Me?
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
23,239
Reaction Score
59,743
My all time favorite Uconn Husky is Sue Bird--beautiful, talented, aggressive, and a leader. I say this with the kindest of intentions--at equal times in their careers Jefferson is much faster, makes excellent decision (so did Sue), and does things with the Basketball Sue never thought of doing. Jefferson's --drive, hesitate, pull back then attack move is pure Mo Jefferson and effective. Sorry Sue I hope you let me to still love U. Jefferson would be my starter.
Not yet. Bird (even if you disregard her as the best PG in the world - i.e. her professional career), was a NPOY, 3 time NLC winner, 1st team AP AA. All things Jefferson has yet to accomplish.

I'd have Jefferson as my reserve G though, due to her speed (change up the team) and defense, along with her offense. (as opposed to Montgomery, Sales, Ralph, Hartley, Rizzotti)
 

CocoHusky

1,000,001 BY points
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
17,208
Reaction Score
73,885
Would someone care to enumerate the ways the game has changed? Perhaps with specific examples?

Here are just some of the ways/reason IMO that the game has changed.
USA Basketball-High level instructions and competition at the prep level creates a pipe line such that UCONN can use this as a measuring stick-as in name the last UCONN recruit to not be invited to their USA basketball age group tryout? OK name the last UCONN recruit not to make USA basketball age group team?
NCAA Rule changes although recent allow coaches to spend more time with players in the off season actually coaching and instructing as long as they are on campus taking classes almost doubling the amount of time a coach can spend instructing.
Game Rules Changes-1 hand check on the perimeter can’t displace cutters & 10 second backcourt changes the pace of the game favors quickness and the more skilled offensive players.
Size, Skill level, & Strength of Players has exponentially increased. 6”4 Rebecca Lobo attempted 150 3Pt shots for her career. Stevie shoots that many in a season. Poor A’ja Wilson gets slammed by me and others for not being able to shoot the 3 ball and at 6’5” wants to be a guard. Jen Rizzotti was fast for her time, but I’m not sure you are timing her and MoJeff with the same instrument. Weightlifting is pretty much standardize across all programs now to the point that the next conditioning maybe to condition like the Marines-Wait I forget they did that also!
Social media and technology-Name a recruit that does not have a highlight tape on YouTube. How many “I saw Geno at this gym looking at this kid” have we seen on twitter. The main effect of this is we get introduced to these kids at an earlier age and God forbid these kids doesn’t correct their weaknesses buy the time the get to UCONN because someone will point it out after every game.
What really brought it home for me was reading Nan’s post in which she said “I love Rebecca to pieces but she's not athletic enough.” I am thinking huh, I agree with her today but when I was watching Rebecca playing she looked pretty darn athletic to me. So I take the easy way out and say yes the game has definitely changed- that is a lot easier that saying I turned into an old fogie.
 

meyers7

You Talkin’ To Me?
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
23,239
Reaction Score
59,743
You took the best point guard of all time off the starting team.
Bird is still on my team just not starting-see why below.
But she's not starting. That's the point.

And you made Moore a PG.
No, on this team DT the two time Lieberman Winner and UCONN alltime assist leader is the PG and a better choice IMO than Bird who is only 4th on the assist list.
Any and every time DT and Bird have played together, Bird is the PG and DT plays the 2. But if you know better than the best coaches in the world, well have at it.

And you put Charles at the 3.
Not really but I understand your confusion.
I should have been listed my starters this way:
Starters:
PG:Taurasi
SG: Moore
SF:Stewart
PF: Charles
C: Wolters
Reserves:
SF/PF: Bascom
C/PF Lobo
PG/SG: Bird
Yes you should have. But I really wasn't confused, just wanted to point out how you had messed up. Still even at this you have Moore as a 2G. She's not a 2G, never has been. She played mostly the 4 in college, and now plays the 3. Stewart can play the 3, but is really a 4. Charles can play the 4 but is really a 5. DT while can be PG (really a combo), she is much better at the 2. Especially when you can have the best PG in the world at the 1, why would you put DT there????

And you put Wolters before Lobo.
Yes I did and here is why. Both players made my team but Wolters is the starter because if you look at the champion season '95 the numbers were comparable 17.1 points & 9.8 rebounds for Lobo and 17 and 8 for Wolters. What gets lost in Wolters' numbers is that she actually increased her numbers over '95 season for the next two season when hardly anyone was paying attention. Wolters never shot below 62% for a full season while Lobo only shot above 50% 1 time- 54% in '94.
Lobo was playing the 4 most of the time, while Wolters was playing solely the 5. Hence the disparity in shooting %. (Lobo attempted 171 3 pt shots. Wolter's none.)
Lobo avg 10.1 rpg, Wolters (as a 5) avg. 7.0. Lobo had more Assists, Steals and Blocks than Wolters. Lobo was a better FT shooter and took more attempts. While Wolters was very good and does I think sometimes get overlooked, Lobo was better (and for this exercise more versatile).

If you want to put Wolters before Lobo, that's up to you, but it wouldn't be based on the numbers.

AGAIN, the starting line up is simple. Writes itself.
Bird (best PG in the world)
DT (best 2G in the world)
Moore (best 3 in the world)
Stewart (one of the top 4's in the world)
Charles (one of the top 5's in the world)

After that, then yea there can be debate.
 

Wally East

Posting via the Speed Force
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
1,467
Reaction Score
3,680
Here are just some of the ways/reason IMO that the game has changed.

Thanks for the very thoughtful response :) It was interesting seeing all of those things together.

I do wonder about the idea of the skill level being higher now than in the past. Isn't that something that Geno has complained about with recent high school classes? That they all just play a lot of games but don't actually practice a lot?
 

UcMiami

How it is
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
14,101
Reaction Score
46,584
Thanks for the very thoughtful response :) It was interesting seeing all of those things together.

I do wonder about the idea of the skill level being higher now than in the past. Isn't that something that Geno has complained about with recent high school classes? That they all just play a lot of games but don't actually practice a lot?
Yes - the fundamentals are not being drilled into kids in practice and they aren't getting the same instruction outside of HS coaching during the HS season according to Geno and many other coaches.

On athleticism - the best gauge is probably the Olympics - every four years there are a number of new world records set for fastest and highest, longest, and strongest, and there are maybe half of those records that last 8 years and only a few 'freak' records that last 12 years or longer. But the changes, except for those 'freak records' are really minor incremental changes. What does change is the number of people who are able to match the eight or 12 year old former records.
So someone who was an outlier in terms of speed or leaping ability 12 years ago is now more 'average'. Add in increasing numbers of participants in women's basketball and improvements in especially shoes and the athleticism is 'better'.
Skill is a whole different issue - Sue Bird is still the career leader in 3pt FG percentage and single season - 13 & 15 year records. Lobo still leads in blocks and average rebounds per game - 21 year old records. Williams, Wolters, and Ralph make up the whole of the single year top ten on field goal percentage 13 - 21 yr old records. Sales in steals, DT in assists.
 

Wally East

Posting via the Speed Force
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
1,467
Reaction Score
3,680
Yes - the fundamentals are not being drilled into kids in practice and they aren't getting the same instruction outside of HS coaching during the HS season according to Geno and many other coaches.

On athleticism - the best gauge is probably the Olympics - every four years there are a number of new world records set for fastest and highest, longest, and strongest, and there are maybe half of those records that last 8 years and only a few 'freak' records that last 12 years or longer. But the changes, except for those 'freak records' are really minor incremental changes. What does change is the number of people who are able to match the eight or 12 year old former records.

Oh, definitely, definitely -- except most track and field records aren't new, they're old, especially women's records. :)
 

Kibitzer

Sky Soldier
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
5,676
Reaction Score
24,714
I agree with the OP -- it's impossible! BUT, I can't resist taking a tongue-in-cheek shot. So here goes.

My starting five:

Conlon, Battle, Faris, Rizzotti, Swanier.

Coming off the bench:

Diana, Maya, Stewie.

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2014
Messages
9,874
Reaction Score
29,425
My all time favorite Uconn Husky is Sue Bird-- talented, aggressive, and a leader. I say this with the kindest of intentions--at equal times in their careers Jefferson is much faster, makes excellent decision (so did Sue), and does things with the Basketball Sue never thought of doing. Jefferson's --drive, hesitate, pull back then attack move is pure Mo Jefferson and effective. Sorry Sue I hope you let me to still love U. Jefferson would be my starter.
IMO, no way! I love Mo, but Sue was athletic, saw the whole court, ran the team on the court with authority, was a terrific shooter, terrific passer, had that ultra competitive "compulsive winner" aura, and was truly the leader on the floor - all this long before her junior year. Total PG package (and still is).

Moriah is hugely athletic and a great shooter. Definitely not as consistently "clutch" in big games/big moments. She may get there next year, but she ain't Sue Bird yet.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2015
Messages
9
Reaction Score
24
I agree with the OP -- it's impossible! BUT, I can't resist taking a tongue-in-cheek shot. So here goes.

My starting five:

Conlon, Battle, Faris, Rizzotti, Swanier.

Coming off the bench:

Diana, Maya, Stewie.

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
Actually a pretty good starting 5!! No one has put in Ann Strother as a back up either!
 

Gus Mahler

Popular Composer
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
4,849
Reaction Score
17,851
Speed and athleticism of both the players and the game as well. But in reality not that much - what has really changed is that there are more highly skilled highly athletic players than 20 years ago. Lobo would still be a Stewart like player but probably with less floor game because no one thought to teach someone that tall guard skills. Tina would make Kara look slow, but then she would make Dolson look slow too.

But would Dolson make Kara look slow?;)
 

blaqtech

Longtime Louisville Lover
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
238
Reaction Score
346
The game has changed dramatically since Lobo played same is true of Sales and Bascom. Yet I doubt any Uconn fan can argue with Sue Bird, Swin Cash, Asyia Jones (?), Tamika William, DT except for lacking in size (compared to Wolters, Lobo, Stef, Stewie, ) they were, as a team, exceptional and made the game of Women's Basketball look faster, more accurate, and yes thrilling than many of the Men's games then. But for pure heart warming thrill --watch Jefferson on the fly she just proves the different level of play.

Well here is the problem I have with this....." The game has changed"
So Cheryl Miller can't play in today's game?? I bet she could....
How about Swoopes or Cooper...??
Lisa Leslie??????
Dawn Staley???



My lineup:

1 Taurasi
2 Sales / Abrosimova
3 Moore
4 Cash
5 Charles

G - Jefferson
F - Abrosimova / Sales
F - Stewart
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
6,579
Reaction Score
16,214
Starters: Diana Taursi, Sue Bird, Maya Moore, Breanna Stewart, Tina Charles
subs: Nykesha Sales, Mo Jefferson, Rebecca Lobo


For all our disagreements regarding 2001 - this was my eight too. How about that, we can agree! :)
 

CocoHusky

1,000,001 BY points
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
17,208
Reaction Score
73,885
AGAIN, the starting line up is simple. Writes itself.
Bird (best PG in the world)
DT (best 2G in the world)
Moore (best 3 in the world)
Stewart (one of the top 4's in the world)
Charles (one of the top 5's in the world)

After that, then yea there can be debate.
The original poster requested opinions on all time UCONN great as starters and 3 reserves so in a sense it is all up for debate. You and I will have to agree to disagree. There is no such thing as an opinion that "writes itself".
 

CocoHusky

1,000,001 BY points
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
17,208
Reaction Score
73,885
Thanks for the very thoughtful response :) It was interesting seeing all of those things together.

I do wonder about the idea of the skill level being higher now than in the past. Isn't that something that Geno has complained about with recent high school classes? That they all just play a lot of games but don't actually practice a lot?
If I remember correctly Geno's complaint was more directed at AAU where the Kids played too many games and hardly ever practiced. High school BB might be an extension of that same complaint but my main complaint about HS BB remains lack of good coaches-Typically the coach is taking on the job as an additional duty at the HS and the lack of standardization NY, NJ and PA for example should all have a shot clock in place at all HS levels. Not playing with a shot clock puts your kids at a severe disadvantage when/if they get to college.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
98
Guests online
1,886
Total visitors
1,984

Forum statistics

Threads
156,871
Messages
4,068,464
Members
9,950
Latest member
Woody69


Top Bottom